Dogmatism among University Students and its Relationship with Some Variables

A. Aalsubhien
{"title":"Dogmatism among University Students and its Relationship with Some Variables","authors":"A. Aalsubhien","doi":"10.29117/jes.2023.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the level of dogmatism among students at King Saud University and Majmaah University. It also aimed to identify the dogmatism level related to gender, academic level, grade point average (GPA), specialization, and participation in student activities. The sample of the study consisted of 499 male and female students from the two universities in the academic year 2020/2021. The descriptive method was used in the study. The data were collected through a dogmatism scale of 30 items by Al-Rakibat and Al-Ja'afrah (2019), after verifying its validity and reliability and modifying it to suit the Saudi setting. The findings revealed that there was more than moderate level of dogmatism among students in the two universities; there were statistically significant differences in dogmatism in favor of King Saud University students, where the t value reached 5.39 at the significance level P = 0.05. With regard to gender, there were significant differences in favor of male students, where the t value reached 4.06 at the significance level P = 0.05. As for the academic specialization, there were significant differences in favor of scientific specialization, where the F value reached 9.2 at the significance level P = 0.05. The study also indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in dogmatism attributed to the academic level. As for the GPA, there were statistically significant differences in favor of the lowest GPA (less than 3.4), where the F value reached 8.17 at the significance level P = 0.05. Finally, there were no significant differences related to participation in student activities. From these results, a number of related recommendations and suggestions, including preparing counseling programs to reduce the level of dogmatism among students, were presented.","PeriodicalId":53076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29117/jes.2023.0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the level of dogmatism among students at King Saud University and Majmaah University. It also aimed to identify the dogmatism level related to gender, academic level, grade point average (GPA), specialization, and participation in student activities. The sample of the study consisted of 499 male and female students from the two universities in the academic year 2020/2021. The descriptive method was used in the study. The data were collected through a dogmatism scale of 30 items by Al-Rakibat and Al-Ja'afrah (2019), after verifying its validity and reliability and modifying it to suit the Saudi setting. The findings revealed that there was more than moderate level of dogmatism among students in the two universities; there were statistically significant differences in dogmatism in favor of King Saud University students, where the t value reached 5.39 at the significance level P = 0.05. With regard to gender, there were significant differences in favor of male students, where the t value reached 4.06 at the significance level P = 0.05. As for the academic specialization, there were significant differences in favor of scientific specialization, where the F value reached 9.2 at the significance level P = 0.05. The study also indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in dogmatism attributed to the academic level. As for the GPA, there were statistically significant differences in favor of the lowest GPA (less than 3.4), where the F value reached 8.17 at the significance level P = 0.05. Finally, there were no significant differences related to participation in student activities. From these results, a number of related recommendations and suggestions, including preparing counseling programs to reduce the level of dogmatism among students, were presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生中的教条主义及其与一些变量的关系
本研究调查了沙特国王大学(King Saud University)和马吉马大学(Majmaah University)学生的教条主义程度。研究还旨在确定教条主义水平与性别、学术水平、平均学分绩点(GPA)、专业和学生活动参与情况的关系。研究样本包括两所大学 2020/2021 学年的 499 名男女学生。研究采用了描述性方法。数据是通过 Al-Rakibat 和 Al-Ja'afrah(2019 年)编制的教条主义量表收集的,该量表由 30 个项目组成,在验证了其有效性和可靠性并根据沙特环境进行修改后得出。研究结果表明,两所大学学生的教条主义程度超过中等水平;在统计学上,沙特国王大学学生的教条主义差异显著,t 值达到 5.39,显著性水平为 P = 0.05。在性别方面,男生的差异较大,t 值为 4.06,显著性水平为 P = 0.05。在学科专业方面,差异显著的是理科专业,F 值达到 9.2,显著性水平为 P = 0.05。研究还表明,学术水平对教条主义的影响在统计学上没有显著差异。在 GPA 方面,GPA 最低(低于 3.4)的学生在统计学上存在显著差异,F 值达到 8.17,显著性水平为 P = 0.05。最后,在参加学生活动方面没有明显差异。根据这些结果,提出了一些相关的建议和意见,包括准备咨询方案以降低学生的教条主义程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Psychological Security among a Sample of Families of Coronavirus Victims in the Gaza Strip Back matter in English The Effectiveness of a Counseling Program in Developing Social Skills and Reducing the Level of Withdrawal Behavior among Handicapped Persons in Al- Shafallah Center صفحة الغلاف (العربي) Level of Pedagogical Content Knowledge among Female New Science Teachers in light of Several Variables: A longitudinal Survey Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1