Affordability of Paediatric Oral Anti-Infective Medicines in a Selected District, Sri Lanka

Malith Kumarasinghe, M. Weerasinghe
{"title":"Affordability of Paediatric Oral Anti-Infective Medicines in a Selected District, Sri Lanka","authors":"Malith Kumarasinghe, M. Weerasinghe","doi":"10.3390/pharma3010011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in the Ratnapura district, Sri Lanka, we assessed the affordability of oral pediatric anti-infective medicines (OPAIMs). Using a modified WHO/HAI medicinal price methodology, we examined the availability, median price ratios (MPRs), mean percentage difference, and affordability of the standard treatment of the originator brand (OB) and lowest-priced generic (LPG) OPAIMs in 30 private and 2 state-owned pharmacies. The study revealed disparities in availability, with only 50% of private pharmacies offering all 11 medicinal drugs in their generic form. The MPRs of OPAIMs for OB and LPG varied, with three drugs exceeding the financially acceptable MPR of 2 (albendazole, amoxicillin, and erythromycin). The standard treatment with LPGs costs between 0.17 and 0.85 and between 0.06 and 0.28 days’ wages for the lowest daily salary of the private sector and unskilled public employees, respectively. We identified erythromycin and albendazole as having less than 50% availability in their generic form in private pharmacies. To address these findings, we recommend frequent pricing revisions based on exchange rates and associated costs, coupled with the establishment of a transparent scientific criterion to subsidize essential medicines deemed “unaffordable.” Failure to implement such measures amidst economic crises may adversely impact financial access to essential medications.","PeriodicalId":74431,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma3010011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in the Ratnapura district, Sri Lanka, we assessed the affordability of oral pediatric anti-infective medicines (OPAIMs). Using a modified WHO/HAI medicinal price methodology, we examined the availability, median price ratios (MPRs), mean percentage difference, and affordability of the standard treatment of the originator brand (OB) and lowest-priced generic (LPG) OPAIMs in 30 private and 2 state-owned pharmacies. The study revealed disparities in availability, with only 50% of private pharmacies offering all 11 medicinal drugs in their generic form. The MPRs of OPAIMs for OB and LPG varied, with three drugs exceeding the financially acceptable MPR of 2 (albendazole, amoxicillin, and erythromycin). The standard treatment with LPGs costs between 0.17 and 0.85 and between 0.06 and 0.28 days’ wages for the lowest daily salary of the private sector and unskilled public employees, respectively. We identified erythromycin and albendazole as having less than 50% availability in their generic form in private pharmacies. To address these findings, we recommend frequent pricing revisions based on exchange rates and associated costs, coupled with the establishment of a transparent scientific criterion to subsidize essential medicines deemed “unaffordable.” Failure to implement such measures amidst economic crises may adversely impact financial access to essential medications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡部分地区儿童口服抗感染药物的可负担性
在斯里兰卡 Ratnapura 地区进行的这项横断面描述性研究中,我们评估了儿科口服抗感染药物(OPAIMs)的可负担性。我们采用修改后的世卫组织/海卫组织药价方法,考察了 30 家私营药店和 2 家国有药店中原研品牌 (OB) 和最低价非专利药 (LPG) OPAIMs 标准疗法的可用性、中位数价格比 (MPR)、平均百分比差和可负担性。研究显示,在供应方面存在差异,只有 50%的私营药房提供全部 11 种非专利药品。OB 和 LPG 的 OPAIM 的 MPR 各不相同,有三种药物(阿苯达唑、阿莫西林和红霉素)的 MPR 超过了经济上可接受的 2。使用液化石油气进行标准治疗的费用分别为 0.17 至 0.85 天的工资和 0.06 至 0.28 天的工资(以私营部门和非熟练公职人员的最低日薪计算)。我们发现,红霉素和阿苯达唑的非专利药在私营药店的供应量不足 50%。针对这些发现,我们建议根据汇率和相关成本频繁调整定价,同时制定透明科学的标准,对被视为 "负担不起 "的基本药物进行补贴。如果在经济危机中不执行这些措施,可能会对基本药物的经济获取产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors and Polypharmacology Using a National Registry Approach A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Effectiveness of Tigecycline in the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea Association of Receipt of Opioid Prescription for Acute Post-Delivery Pain Management with Buprenorphine Discontinuation among Postpartum People with Opioid Use Disorder Pioneering Arterial Hypertension Phenotyping on Nationally Aggregated Electronic Health Records Affordability of Paediatric Oral Anti-Infective Medicines in a Selected District, Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1