Parametric and Nonparametric Approaches of Reid Vapor Pressure Prediction for Gasoline Containing Oxygenates: A Comparative Analysis Using Partial Least Squares, Nonlinear, and LOWESS Regression Modelling Strategies with Physical Properties

IF 0.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Modelling and Simulation in Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1155/2024/8442457
H. Issa
{"title":"Parametric and Nonparametric Approaches of Reid Vapor Pressure Prediction for Gasoline Containing Oxygenates: A Comparative Analysis Using Partial Least Squares, Nonlinear, and LOWESS Regression Modelling Strategies with Physical Properties","authors":"H. Issa","doi":"10.1155/2024/8442457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides insights into the challenges involved in predicting the Reid vapor pressure (RVP) of gasoline-oxygenate blends (GOB), which is an important indicator of fuel quality and compliance with environmental and performance standards. Given the enormous variety of gasoline compositions and ratios available, there is a significant demand for a fast, straightforward, and cost-effective technique to predict RVP without relying on costly instruments or complicated spectral measurements that involve numerous input variables. A comparative performance analysis has been performed for different regression modelling strategies for predicting RVP in GOB, which is valuable for researchers and practitioners in the petroleum industry for saving time and money. Parametric and nonparametric approaches were compared using partial least squares regression (PLSR), nonlinear regression (NLR), and nonparametric regression (NPR) models. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) approach was applied to the NPR model. The gasoline’s physical characteristics (distillation curves and density) formed the basis for the analysis of these models’ performances. Acceptable error metrics have been reached for root mean square error of calibration and prediction (RMSEC and RMSEP) values, for the PLSR, NLR, and NPR models, which are 4.790, 6.235, 4.739, 6.149, 3.968, and 6.029, respectively, which are close for those reported in literature. The NPR model eliminates parametric constraints and allows for a different kind of data structure to emerge. The established models here demonstrate a sound ability to overcome barriers by omitting the use of inconvenient spectral measurements to save expense and simplify data calibration, making them a promising approach for RVP detection of GOB. This finding aids in the development of more accurate RVP prediction models and contributes to the optimization of fuel formulations.","PeriodicalId":45541,"journal":{"name":"Modelling and Simulation in Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modelling and Simulation in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8442457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides insights into the challenges involved in predicting the Reid vapor pressure (RVP) of gasoline-oxygenate blends (GOB), which is an important indicator of fuel quality and compliance with environmental and performance standards. Given the enormous variety of gasoline compositions and ratios available, there is a significant demand for a fast, straightforward, and cost-effective technique to predict RVP without relying on costly instruments or complicated spectral measurements that involve numerous input variables. A comparative performance analysis has been performed for different regression modelling strategies for predicting RVP in GOB, which is valuable for researchers and practitioners in the petroleum industry for saving time and money. Parametric and nonparametric approaches were compared using partial least squares regression (PLSR), nonlinear regression (NLR), and nonparametric regression (NPR) models. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) approach was applied to the NPR model. The gasoline’s physical characteristics (distillation curves and density) formed the basis for the analysis of these models’ performances. Acceptable error metrics have been reached for root mean square error of calibration and prediction (RMSEC and RMSEP) values, for the PLSR, NLR, and NPR models, which are 4.790, 6.235, 4.739, 6.149, 3.968, and 6.029, respectively, which are close for those reported in literature. The NPR model eliminates parametric constraints and allows for a different kind of data structure to emerge. The established models here demonstrate a sound ability to overcome barriers by omitting the use of inconvenient spectral measurements to save expense and simplify data calibration, making them a promising approach for RVP detection of GOB. This finding aids in the development of more accurate RVP prediction models and contributes to the optimization of fuel formulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含氧汽油里德蒸气压预测的参数和非参数方法:使用偏最小二乘法、非线性和 LOWESS 回归建模策略与物理特性的比较分析
本研究深入探讨了预测汽油-氧混合燃料(GOB)里德蒸气压(RVP)所面临的挑战,RVP 是衡量燃料质量以及是否符合环境和性能标准的重要指标。鉴于现有的汽油成分和比例种类繁多,因此非常需要一种快速、直接、经济高效的技术来预测里德蒸气压,而无需依赖昂贵的仪器或涉及大量输入变量的复杂光谱测量。我们对不同的回归建模策略进行了性能比较分析,以预测石油气中的 RVP,这对石油行业的研究人员和从业人员节省时间和金钱非常有价值。使用偏最小二乘回归 (PLSR)、非线性回归 (NLR) 和非参数回归 (NPR) 模型对参数和非参数方法进行了比较。NPR 模型采用了局部加权散点图平滑法(LOWESS)。汽油的物理特性(馏程曲线和密度)是分析这些模型性能的基础。PLSR、NLR 和 NPR 模型的标定和预测均方根误差(RMSEC 和 RMSEP)值达到了可接受的误差指标,分别为 4.790、6.235、4.739、6.149、3.968 和 6.029,与文献报道的误差指标接近。NPR 模型消除了参数限制,允许出现一种不同的数据结构。这里建立的模型通过省略使用不方便的光谱测量来节省开支和简化数据校准,从而显示出克服障碍的良好能力,使其成为一种很有前途的 GOB RVP 检测方法。这一发现有助于开发更准确的 RVP 预测模型,并有助于优化燃料配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
42
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Modelling and Simulation in Engineering aims at providing a forum for the discussion of formalisms, methodologies and simulation tools that are intended to support the new, broader interpretation of Engineering. Competitive pressures of Global Economy have had a profound effect on the manufacturing in Europe, Japan and the USA with much of the production being outsourced. In this context the traditional interpretation of engineering profession linked to the actual manufacturing needs to be broadened to include the integration of outsourced components and the consideration of logistic, economical and human factors in the design of engineering products and services.
期刊最新文献
Finite Element Modelling and Simulation of Tunnel Gates of Dam Structures in ABAQUS Using Reduced-Integrated 8-Node Hexahedral Solid-Shell Element Modeling and Simulation of the Effect of Airbag Thickness on the Performance of Extended Handle Pneumatic Floor Jack Assessment of Fractional and Integer Order Models of Induction Motor Using MATLAB/Simulink State of the Art of Modelling and Design Approaches for Ejectors in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Predictive Modeling of Environmental Impact on Drone Datalink Communication System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1