An Analysis of Questions from Teachers' Online Groups: Turning the Lens Back to Teacher Education

Daniel Friedrich, James Shanahan
{"title":"An Analysis of Questions from Teachers' Online Groups: Turning the Lens Back to Teacher Education","authors":"Daniel Friedrich, James Shanahan","doi":"10.1177/01614681241238882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the first months of the COVID pandemic, teachers were forced to move to online instruction without the appropriate resources. They resorted to social media to gather expertise and ideas. This study is grounded in an analysis of the questions posed by K–12 teachers on popular Facebook groups. The authors argue that a close analysis of what K–12 educators are asking and wondering about in online teacher groups at a moment in which much of what they know and trust has been disrupted can be generative as a novel feedback loop to engage in conversations about some common practices in teacher education. Specifically, they ask: How can an analysis of questions posed by educators on public Facebook groups in the early pandemic enter into a productive conversation with teacher education programs beyond the specificities of that context? The study performs a thematic analysis based on categories that were inductively coded from 752 questions posed between March and June 2020 by educators in the three most popular public Facebook groups dedicated exclusively to K–12 teaching during the pandemic. The goal is to consider the underlying assumptions and ideas embedded in the questions being asked in these groups, and to place them within the context of the authors’ political understandings of the role of teacher education. Four themes emerged from the analysis: an expanding notion of community, tensions in the understandings of “context,” new positionings of expertise, and a questioning of what counts as legitimate schooling. The themes led to a need for teacher education programs to always consider their students’ professional identities as collectively constructed and to find ways to disrupt universal models of the mind. The authors also invite programs to rethink the location of expertise by taking into account the practices that young teachers are already engaged in when seeking professional knowledge. This opening could potentially lead to perhaps the hardest thing to do within teacher education programs: to provide the conditions to reimagine schooling.","PeriodicalId":22248,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241238882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the first months of the COVID pandemic, teachers were forced to move to online instruction without the appropriate resources. They resorted to social media to gather expertise and ideas. This study is grounded in an analysis of the questions posed by K–12 teachers on popular Facebook groups. The authors argue that a close analysis of what K–12 educators are asking and wondering about in online teacher groups at a moment in which much of what they know and trust has been disrupted can be generative as a novel feedback loop to engage in conversations about some common practices in teacher education. Specifically, they ask: How can an analysis of questions posed by educators on public Facebook groups in the early pandemic enter into a productive conversation with teacher education programs beyond the specificities of that context? The study performs a thematic analysis based on categories that were inductively coded from 752 questions posed between March and June 2020 by educators in the three most popular public Facebook groups dedicated exclusively to K–12 teaching during the pandemic. The goal is to consider the underlying assumptions and ideas embedded in the questions being asked in these groups, and to place them within the context of the authors’ political understandings of the role of teacher education. Four themes emerged from the analysis: an expanding notion of community, tensions in the understandings of “context,” new positionings of expertise, and a questioning of what counts as legitimate schooling. The themes led to a need for teacher education programs to always consider their students’ professional identities as collectively constructed and to find ways to disrupt universal models of the mind. The authors also invite programs to rethink the location of expertise by taking into account the practices that young teachers are already engaged in when seeking professional knowledge. This opening could potentially lead to perhaps the hardest thing to do within teacher education programs: to provide the conditions to reimagine schooling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师在线小组问题分析:将视角转回教师教育
在 COVID 大流行的头几个月,教师们在没有适当资源的情况下被迫转向在线教学。他们借助社交媒体收集专业知识和想法。本研究基于对 K-12 教师在 Facebook 热门群组中提出的问题的分析。作者认为,在 K-12 教育工作者所了解和信任的许多东西都被打乱的时候,对他们在在线教师群组中提出的问题和疑惑进行仔细分析,可以作为一种新颖的反馈循环,对教师教育中的一些常见做法进行对话。具体而言,他们提出了以下问题:在大流行病早期,如何通过分析教育工作者在 Facebook 公共群组中提出的问题,与教师教育项目开展富有成效的对话?本研究根据教育工作者在 2020 年 3 月至 6 月期间在三个最受欢迎的专门讨论大流行期间 K-12 教学的 Facebook 公共群组中提出的 752 个问题进行归纳编码,并根据这些类别进行主题分析。其目的是考虑这些群组所提问题中蕴含的基本假设和观点,并将其置于作者对师范教育角色的政治理解的背景下。分析中出现了四个主题:不断扩展的社区概念、对 "背景 "理解的紧张关系、对专业知识的新定位以及对合法学校教育的质疑。这些主题促使师范教育项目必须始终将学生的专业身份视为集体建构的身份,并想方设法打破普遍的思维模式。作者还请师范教育项目考虑到青年教师在寻求专业知识时已经参与的实践,重新思考专业知识的定位。这种开放性可能会带来教师教育项目中最难做的事情:提供重新想象学校教育的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pride Flags in Public Schools: Evolving Legal Issues to Consider “It’s Going to Go Beyond These Walls”: Toward a More Expansive Vision of Civic Learning Taking Seriously Campus Debates Surrounding Invited Speakers: Open-Mindedness and the Ethics of Inquiry in Higher Education From a Spark, a Mighty Flame: How Germinal Networks Support Teachers of Color to Promote Change in Activist Organizations and Beyond Avenues for Engagement? Testing the Democratic Nature of Library Book Challenge Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1