Optimizing Crop Yield Estimation through Geospatial Technology: A Comparative Analysis of a Semi-Physical Model, Crop Simulation, and Machine Learning Algorithms

M. Gumma, Ramavenkata Mahesh Nukala, P. Panjala, P. Bellam, Snigdha Gajjala, S. K. Dubey, Vinay Kumar Sehgal, Ismail Mohammed, K. C. Deevi
{"title":"Optimizing Crop Yield Estimation through Geospatial Technology: A Comparative Analysis of a Semi-Physical Model, Crop Simulation, and Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"M. Gumma, Ramavenkata Mahesh Nukala, P. Panjala, P. Bellam, Snigdha Gajjala, S. K. Dubey, Vinay Kumar Sehgal, Ismail Mohammed, K. C. Deevi","doi":"10.3390/agriengineering6010045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study underscores the critical importance of accurate crop yield information for national food security and export considerations, with a specific focus on wheat yield estimation at the Gram Panchayat (GP) level in Bareilly district, Uttar Pradesh, using technologies such as machine learning algorithms (ML), the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) crop model and semi-physical models (SPMs). The research integrates Sentinel-2 time-series data and ground data to generate comprehensive crop type maps. These maps offer insights into spatial variations in crop extent, growth stages and the leaf area index (LAI), serving as essential components for precise yield assessment. The classification of crops employed spectral matching techniques (SMTs) on Sentinel-2 time-series data, complemented by field surveys and ground data on crop management. The strategic identification of crop-cutting experiment (CCE) locations, based on a combination of crop type maps, soil data and weather parameters, further enhanced the precision of the study. A systematic comparison of three major crop yield estimation models revealed distinctive gaps in each approach. Machine learning models exhibit effectiveness in homogenous areas with similar cultivars, while the accuracy of a semi-physical model depends upon the resolution of the utilized data. The DSSAT model is effective in predicting yields at specific locations but faces difficulties when trying to extend these predictions to cover a larger study area. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers by providing near-real-time, high-resolution crop yield estimates at the local level, facilitating informed decision making in attaining food security.","PeriodicalId":7846,"journal":{"name":"AgriEngineering","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6010045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study underscores the critical importance of accurate crop yield information for national food security and export considerations, with a specific focus on wheat yield estimation at the Gram Panchayat (GP) level in Bareilly district, Uttar Pradesh, using technologies such as machine learning algorithms (ML), the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) crop model and semi-physical models (SPMs). The research integrates Sentinel-2 time-series data and ground data to generate comprehensive crop type maps. These maps offer insights into spatial variations in crop extent, growth stages and the leaf area index (LAI), serving as essential components for precise yield assessment. The classification of crops employed spectral matching techniques (SMTs) on Sentinel-2 time-series data, complemented by field surveys and ground data on crop management. The strategic identification of crop-cutting experiment (CCE) locations, based on a combination of crop type maps, soil data and weather parameters, further enhanced the precision of the study. A systematic comparison of three major crop yield estimation models revealed distinctive gaps in each approach. Machine learning models exhibit effectiveness in homogenous areas with similar cultivars, while the accuracy of a semi-physical model depends upon the resolution of the utilized data. The DSSAT model is effective in predicting yields at specific locations but faces difficulties when trying to extend these predictions to cover a larger study area. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers by providing near-real-time, high-resolution crop yield estimates at the local level, facilitating informed decision making in attaining food security.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过地理空间技术优化作物产量估算:半物理模型、作物模拟和机器学习算法的比较分析
这项研究强调了准确的作物产量信息对于国家粮食安全和出口考虑的极端重要性,特别关注北方邦巴雷利县(GP)一级的小麦产量估算,采用的技术包括机器学习算法(ML)、农业技术转让决策支持系统(DSSAT)作物模型和半物理模型(SPM)。这项研究整合了哨兵-2 时间序列数据和地面数据,以生成全面的作物类型图。这些地图有助于深入了解作物范围、生长阶段和叶面积指数(LAI)的空间变化,是精确产量评估的重要组成部分。作物分类采用了哨兵-2 时间序列数据的光谱匹配技术(SMT),并辅以有关作物管理的实地调查和地面数据。根据作物类型图、土壤数据和天气参数,战略性地确定了作物切种试验(CCE)地点,进一步提高了研究的精确度。对三种主要作物产量估算模型进行系统比较后发现,每种方法都存在明显差距。机器学习模型在栽培品种相似的同质地区表现出有效性,而半物理模型的准确性则取决于所利用数据的分辨率。DSSAT 模型能有效预测特定地点的产量,但在试图将这些预测扩展到更大的研究区域时却面临困难。这项研究通过在地方一级提供近实时、高分辨率的作物产量估算,为决策者提供了宝贵的见解,有助于在实现粮食安全方面做出明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Integrated Engineering Method for Improving Air Quality of Cage-Free Hen Housing Optimizing Deep Learning Algorithms for Effective Chicken Tracking through Image Processing Integrating Actuator Fault-Tolerant Control and Deep-Learning-Based NDVI Estimation for Precision Agriculture with a Hexacopter UAV Usability Testing of Novel IoT-Infused Digital Services on Farm Equipment Reveals Farmer’s Requirements towards Future Human–Machine Interface Design Guidelines Chemical Control of Coffee Berry Borer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle under Different Operating Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1