Doxography and Eschatology in Clement of Alexandria

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1163/15700720-bja10088
Charlotte Kirsch-Klingelhöffer
{"title":"Doxography and Eschatology in Clement of Alexandria","authors":"Charlotte Kirsch-Klingelhöffer","doi":"10.1163/15700720-bja10088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn strom. V.9.1 and strom. V.14.103–106, Clement of Alexandria presents opinions (doxai) of Greek philosophers regarding ‘eschatology’. By making use of so-called doxographies (i.e. the collection of philosophical opinions on a particular topic), Clement employs a popular method in contemporary philosophical debate. In this article, I will show how Clement reinterprets philosophers’ opinions and modifies them to construct a philosophical proof for (Christian) eschatology. It allows him to make controversial topics such as ‘final judgement’ and ‘resurrection’ more plausible to his philosophically educated readers, as according to him, these ideas have already been discussed and confirmed by several well-known philosophers (Heraclitus, Empedocles, Plato and the Stoics).","PeriodicalId":44928,"journal":{"name":"VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700720-bja10088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In strom. V.9.1 and strom. V.14.103–106, Clement of Alexandria presents opinions (doxai) of Greek philosophers regarding ‘eschatology’. By making use of so-called doxographies (i.e. the collection of philosophical opinions on a particular topic), Clement employs a popular method in contemporary philosophical debate. In this article, I will show how Clement reinterprets philosophers’ opinions and modifies them to construct a philosophical proof for (Christian) eschatology. It allows him to make controversial topics such as ‘final judgement’ and ‘resurrection’ more plausible to his philosophically educated readers, as according to him, these ideas have already been discussed and confirmed by several well-known philosophers (Heraclitus, Empedocles, Plato and the Stoics).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚历山大的克莱门特中的颂词和末世论
在 strom.V.9.1 和 strom.V.14.103-106 中,亚历山大的克莱门特介绍了希腊哲学家关于 "末世论 "的观点(doxai)。通过使用所谓的 doxographies(即收集关于特定主题的哲学观点),克莱门特采用了当代哲学辩论中一种流行的方法。在本文中,我将展示克莱门特如何重新诠释哲学家们的观点并加以修改,从而为(基督教)末世论构建一个哲学证明。这使他能够让受过哲学教育的读者对 "最终审判 "和 "复活 "等有争议的话题更加信服,因为根据他的说法,这些观点已经被几位著名的哲学家(赫拉克利特、恩培多克勒、柏拉图和斯多葛派)讨论过并得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Vigiliae Christianae contains articles and short notes of an historical, cultural, linguistic or philological nature on early Christian literature written after the New Testament, as well as on Christian epigraphy and archaeology. Church and dogmatic history are dealt with as they relate to social history; Byzantine and medieval literature are treated as far as they exhibit continuity with the early Christian period. ● Leading journal in its field. ● Extensive book review section giving a critical analysis of other titles related to the field.
期刊最新文献
Elementary Errors: Philosophers, Idolaters, and τὰ στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου in Paul and Clement of Alexandria Justin Martyr’s Problem with Platonism: Heresy and Anthropology in Dialogue 4 and the Syntagma Doxography and Eschatology in Clement of Alexandria “Just as You Quenched the Fiery Furnace of Nebuchadnezzar, Also Quench Every Fever.” The Three Holy Children in Coptic Magic Mani and Augustine. Collected Essays on Mani, Manichaeism and Augustine, written by Johannes van Oort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1