Acute type a aortic dissection: when not to operate, a review

Thais Faggion Vinholo, Jake Awtry, Robert Semco, Paige Newell, Ashraf Sabe
{"title":"Acute type a aortic dissection: when not to operate, a review","authors":"Thais Faggion Vinholo, Jake Awtry, Robert Semco, Paige Newell, Ashraf Sabe","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2023.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with a nonoperative mortality rate of up to 1% per hour and an operative mortality rate as high as 24%. Therefore, evaluation of comorbidities and patient presentation characteristics prompts a pause for risk stratification before proceeding to the operating room, as emergent surgery may not always be the optimal approach. This comprehensive review explores key considerations in ATAAD management, emphasizing the need for nuanced decision making, by considering medical management and delayed surgery as an alternative management approach for high-risk populations such as the frail or patients who have a history of cardiac surgery. Beyond the immediate threat of aortic rupture, organ malperfusion stands out as the most feared complication of ATAAD, also elevating perioperative risk significantly. In such cases, careful assessment of patient’s hemodynamic status is paramount. For stable patients, a thorough preoperative strategy and multidisciplinary discussions are encouraged. Notably, the advent of endovascular techniques provides viable lower-risk alternatives to the traditional open approach. The consequences of ATAAD surgical intervention extend beyond the immediate procedural concerns, with a substantial impact on the patient’s overall function. Prioritizing patient-centered care becomes imperative in aligning management with individual goals of care. This review seeks to provide insights into these considerations by offering a stepwise approach to patient-centered decision-making in ATAAD management.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"46 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with a nonoperative mortality rate of up to 1% per hour and an operative mortality rate as high as 24%. Therefore, evaluation of comorbidities and patient presentation characteristics prompts a pause for risk stratification before proceeding to the operating room, as emergent surgery may not always be the optimal approach. This comprehensive review explores key considerations in ATAAD management, emphasizing the need for nuanced decision making, by considering medical management and delayed surgery as an alternative management approach for high-risk populations such as the frail or patients who have a history of cardiac surgery. Beyond the immediate threat of aortic rupture, organ malperfusion stands out as the most feared complication of ATAAD, also elevating perioperative risk significantly. In such cases, careful assessment of patient’s hemodynamic status is paramount. For stable patients, a thorough preoperative strategy and multidisciplinary discussions are encouraged. Notably, the advent of endovascular techniques provides viable lower-risk alternatives to the traditional open approach. The consequences of ATAAD surgical intervention extend beyond the immediate procedural concerns, with a substantial impact on the patient’s overall function. Prioritizing patient-centered care becomes imperative in aligning management with individual goals of care. This review seeks to provide insights into these considerations by offering a stepwise approach to patient-centered decision-making in ATAAD management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性 a 型主动脉夹层:何时不动手术,综述
急性 A 型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)是一种外科急症,非手术死亡率高达每小时 1%,手术死亡率高达 24%。因此,在进入手术室之前,对合并症和患者表现特征的评估需要暂停,以进行风险分层,因为急诊手术并不总是最佳方法。这篇综合性综述探讨了 ATAAD 管理中的主要注意事项,强调需要做出细致入微的决策,考虑将药物治疗和延迟手术作为高危人群(如体弱者或有心脏手术史的患者)的替代管理方法。除了主动脉破裂的直接威胁外,器官灌注不良是 ATAAD 最令人担忧的并发症,也会大大增加围手术期的风险。在这种情况下,仔细评估患者的血流动力学状态至关重要。对于病情稳定的患者,应制定周密的术前策略并进行多学科讨论。值得注意的是,血管内技术的出现为传统的开放式手术提供了可行的低风险替代方案。ATAAD 手术干预的后果不仅仅是眼前的手术问题,还会对患者的整体功能产生重大影响。以患者为中心的优先护理成为根据个人护理目标进行管理的当务之急。本综述旨在通过在 ATAAD 管理中提供以患者为中心的逐步决策方法,深入探讨这些考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine Association of inflammation, oxidative stress, and deteriorated cognitive functions in patients after cardiac surgery Role of inflammation in the progression of diabetic kidney disease Multivessel disease in patient with acute myocardial infarction: current treatment strategies and future perspectives Editorial review: guidance for future atrial fibrillation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1