Effect of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hypochlorite on the apical sealing ability of endodontic sealers

Israel Bangel Carlotto, Natália Franco Brum, Guilherme Pauletto, Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, C. A. Bier
{"title":"Effect of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hypochlorite on the apical sealing ability of endodontic sealers","authors":"Israel Bangel Carlotto, Natália Franco Brum, Guilherme Pauletto, Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, C. A. Bier","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8672700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to compare the influence of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and calcium hypochlorite [Ca(OCl)2 ] on the apical sealing capacity of AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) and Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) endodontic sealers. Methods: Sixty permanent human lower incisors were randomly allocated (http://www.randomized.org), according to the irrigant used, into three groups (n=20): 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl/Control); 2.5% NaOCl; and 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 . The root canal was prepared with rotary files under 10 mL of the solution corresponding to the experimental group. Each group was subdivided into two (n=10) according to the sealer used for filling: AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) or Bio-C Sealer (Angelus). Then, all samples were immersed in black India ink for one week. After the storage period, the roots were then grooved longitudinally and split, and the ink penetration was measured from the apical part to the coronal part of the root canal into which the ink penetrated using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests. Results: There was no statistical difference in ink penetration between the different endodontic sealers tested for the same irrigating solution (p > 0.05). However, when the Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) was used, the group treated with 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 was associated with lower values of apical leakage, compared to 2.5% NaOCl (p < 0.05). For the AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Maillefer), there was no difference between the irrigants (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Associating Ca(OCl)2 irrigant with Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) seems to be a good option to reduce apical leakage.","PeriodicalId":34984,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"34 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8672700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the influence of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and calcium hypochlorite [Ca(OCl)2 ] on the apical sealing capacity of AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) and Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) endodontic sealers. Methods: Sixty permanent human lower incisors were randomly allocated (http://www.randomized.org), according to the irrigant used, into three groups (n=20): 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl/Control); 2.5% NaOCl; and 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 . The root canal was prepared with rotary files under 10 mL of the solution corresponding to the experimental group. Each group was subdivided into two (n=10) according to the sealer used for filling: AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) or Bio-C Sealer (Angelus). Then, all samples were immersed in black India ink for one week. After the storage period, the roots were then grooved longitudinally and split, and the ink penetration was measured from the apical part to the coronal part of the root canal into which the ink penetrated using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests. Results: There was no statistical difference in ink penetration between the different endodontic sealers tested for the same irrigating solution (p > 0.05). However, when the Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) was used, the group treated with 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 was associated with lower values of apical leakage, compared to 2.5% NaOCl (p < 0.05). For the AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Maillefer), there was no difference between the irrigants (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Associating Ca(OCl)2 irrigant with Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) seems to be a good option to reduce apical leakage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
次氯酸钠和次氯酸钙对牙髓密封剂根尖封闭能力的影响
目的:本研究旨在比较次氯酸钠 (NaOCl) 和次氯酸钙 [Ca(OCl)2 ] 对 AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer) 和 Bio-C Sealer (Angelus) 根管封闭剂根尖封闭能力的影响。方法:将 60 颗人类永久下切牙随机分配 (http://www.randomized.org),根据所使用的冲洗剂分为三组 (n=20):0.9% 氯化钠 (NaCl/对照组);2.5% NaOCl;和 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 。用旋转锉在 10 毫升实验组对应的溶液下预备根管。根据充填时使用的封闭剂,每组又分为两组(n=10):AH Plus(Dentsply Maillefer)或 Bio-C Sealer(Angelus)。然后,将所有样品浸泡在黑色印度墨水中一周。保存期结束后,将牙根纵向开槽并劈开,使用体视显微镜测量墨水渗入根管的根尖部至冠状部。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验。结果:在相同的冲洗液下,不同的根管封闭剂在墨水渗透性方面没有统计学差异(P > 0.05)。然而,当使用 Bio-C 封闭剂(Angelus)时,与 2.5% NaOCl 相比,使用 2.5% Ca(OCl)2 处理的组的根尖渗漏值更低(p < 0.05)。对于 AH Plus 封闭剂(Dentsply Maillefer),两种冲洗剂之间没有差异(p > 0.05)。结论:将 Ca(OCl)2 冲洗剂与 Bio-C 封闭剂(Angelus)结合使用似乎是减少根尖渗漏的一个不错选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences is an international non-profit journal, which publishes full-Length papers, original research reports, literature reviews, special reports, clinical cases, current topics and short communications, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles concerning the use of propolis in dentistry ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles effect on setting time, microhardness, and compressive strength of calcium-enriched-mixture cement Effect of music therapy on pain and anxiety during third molar surgery Differences in dental care for pregnant women in the public sector after the creation of Previne Brasil Polypoid non-neural granular cell tumor of the oral cavity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1