Aerosol Therapy With Inhalers During Mechanical Ventilation

Robyn Haas, Jennie Horton
{"title":"Aerosol Therapy With Inhalers During Mechanical Ventilation","authors":"Robyn Haas, Jennie Horton","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nMechanical ventilation helps individuals breathe when they cannot do so on their own. During mechanical ventilation, aerosol therapy is used to deliver medication to the lungs of the person who is using the ventilator. \nHigh doses of aerosol therapy administered via metered dose inhaler for adults and older adults who are mechanically ventilated is common clinical practice. However, the reasoning behind this practice, and whether it has clinical benefits compared to no doses and standard doses, is unclear. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nTo inform decisions about high doses of aerosol therapy delivered with metered dose inhalers in adults and older adults receiving mechanical ventilation, we sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the clinical effectiveness of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy versus no aerosol therapy. We also sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the clinical effectiveness of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy versus standard doses. \nA research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2004, and January 25, 2024. The search was limited to English-language documents. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included study, and narratively summarized the findings. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nWe found 1 retrospective chart review that compared the clinical effectiveness of 2 different doses of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy. The findings from this study suggest that, compared to lower doses, higher doses of salbutamol are associated with more days alive and free of acute lung injury and more days alive and free of indicators of acute respiratory distress and respiratory failure. \nWe did not find any studies that compared the clinical effectiveness of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy to no aerosol therapy for adults and older adults receiving mechanical ventilation that met inclusion criteria for our review. \n \nWhat Does It Mean? \n \nThe available evidence with methodological limitations suggests that high doses of aerosol therapy with salbutamol may be associated with better clinical respiratory outcomes when compared to low doses in patients with acute lung injury who are mechanically ventilated. To inform future clinical practice, decision-makers may want to consider the potential risks and benefits and environmental implications of aerosol therapy, as well as implementation factors (e.g., resource needs, risk of contamination). \nAdditional clinical studies would help provide a better understanding of the optimal dosage and clinical effectiveness of aerosol therapy for patients who are mechanically ventilated. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What Is the Issue? Mechanical ventilation helps individuals breathe when they cannot do so on their own. During mechanical ventilation, aerosol therapy is used to deliver medication to the lungs of the person who is using the ventilator. High doses of aerosol therapy administered via metered dose inhaler for adults and older adults who are mechanically ventilated is common clinical practice. However, the reasoning behind this practice, and whether it has clinical benefits compared to no doses and standard doses, is unclear. What Did We Do? To inform decisions about high doses of aerosol therapy delivered with metered dose inhalers in adults and older adults receiving mechanical ventilation, we sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the clinical effectiveness of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy versus no aerosol therapy. We also sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the clinical effectiveness of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy versus standard doses. A research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2004, and January 25, 2024. The search was limited to English-language documents. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included study, and narratively summarized the findings. What Did We Find? We found 1 retrospective chart review that compared the clinical effectiveness of 2 different doses of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy. The findings from this study suggest that, compared to lower doses, higher doses of salbutamol are associated with more days alive and free of acute lung injury and more days alive and free of indicators of acute respiratory distress and respiratory failure. We did not find any studies that compared the clinical effectiveness of inhaled high doses of aerosol therapy to no aerosol therapy for adults and older adults receiving mechanical ventilation that met inclusion criteria for our review. What Does It Mean? The available evidence with methodological limitations suggests that high doses of aerosol therapy with salbutamol may be associated with better clinical respiratory outcomes when compared to low doses in patients with acute lung injury who are mechanically ventilated. To inform future clinical practice, decision-makers may want to consider the potential risks and benefits and environmental implications of aerosol therapy, as well as implementation factors (e.g., resource needs, risk of contamination). Additional clinical studies would help provide a better understanding of the optimal dosage and clinical effectiveness of aerosol therapy for patients who are mechanically ventilated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气时使用吸入器进行气溶胶治疗
问题出在哪里? 机械通气可以在患者无法自主呼吸时帮助他们呼吸。在机械通气期间,气雾疗法用于向使用呼吸机的患者的肺部输送药物。通过计量吸入器为接受机械通气的成年人和老年人提供大剂量的气溶胶治疗是临床上常见的做法。然而,这种做法背后的原因以及与无剂量和标准剂量相比是否具有临床益处尚不清楚。 我们做了什么? 为了给成人和接受机械通气的老年人使用定量吸入器进行大剂量气雾剂治疗的决策提供依据,我们试图找出并总结比较吸入大剂量气雾剂治疗与无气雾剂治疗临床疗效的文献。我们还试图找出并总结比较吸入大剂量气雾剂治疗与标准剂量治疗临床效果的文献。研究信息专家对 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 25 日期间发表的同行评审文献和灰色文献进行了文献检索。检索仅限于英文文献。一位审稿人根据预先设定的标准筛选纳入文章,对纳入的研究进行批判性评估,并对研究结果进行叙述性总结。 我们发现了什么? 我们发现了一篇回顾性图表综述,该综述比较了两种不同剂量的吸入式大剂量气雾疗法的临床效果。这项研究的结果表明,与低剂量相比,高剂量沙丁胺醇与更多的存活天数和无急性肺损伤相关,与更多的存活天数和无急性呼吸窘迫和呼吸衰竭指标相关。对于接受机械通气的成人和老年人,我们没有找到任何符合纳入标准的研究,来比较吸入大剂量气雾剂治疗和不使用气雾剂治疗的临床效果。 这意味着什么? 受方法学限制的现有证据表明,对于接受机械通气的急性肺损伤患者,与小剂量沙丁胺醇相比,大剂量沙丁胺醇气雾剂治疗可能具有更好的临床呼吸效果。为指导未来的临床实践,决策者可能需要考虑气雾疗法的潜在风险和益处、对环境的影响以及实施因素(如资源需求、污染风险)。更多的临床研究将有助于更好地了解气雾疗法对机械通气患者的最佳剂量和临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relugolix (Orgovyx) Nabilone for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus in Canada 2023 Abstracts of the Canadian Association for Population Therapeutics The Development of a Model Validation Tool to Assist in the Conduct of Economic Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1