Azov sea fishes stock assessment by swept area method through bootstrap

M. M. Piatinskii, V. N. Belousov, S. N. Kulba
{"title":"Azov sea fishes stock assessment by swept area method through bootstrap","authors":"M. M. Piatinskii, V. N. Belousov, S. N. Kulba","doi":"10.36038/0234-2774-2024-25-1-143-152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently driven changes in habitat conditions in the Azov Sea make classic applications of swept area method inconsistent. Swept area stock assessment method modification for stock estimation of aquatic biological resources through nonparametric bootstrap is presented. New approach is tested against classic calculated results of swept area method for next fish species: Azov anchovy, tulka, turbot and Black-Azov sea shad according to data collected during 2022. Results comparison of classic and modified through bootstrap stock assessment methods leads no significant deviations in mean value estimation. Maximum difference between mean estimates of stock size was 3,75%. Confidential intervals width difference between reviewed methods, in general, was not significant. Most valuable difference in confidential intervals was detected in BCa approach against classic method with quantile approach (due to methodological features of BCa in bias correction procedure). The new stock assessment approach for swept area method though bootstrap permit to calculate statistically valid estimates, their confidential intervals and perform input data validation. The absence of significant differences in the results by the classical and proposed methods indicates the further applicable possibility of classic method even in normality violation in source samples. The normality requirements in methodology of classic approach, probably, is redundant.","PeriodicalId":129863,"journal":{"name":"Problems of fisheries","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36038/0234-2774-2024-25-1-143-152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently driven changes in habitat conditions in the Azov Sea make classic applications of swept area method inconsistent. Swept area stock assessment method modification for stock estimation of aquatic biological resources through nonparametric bootstrap is presented. New approach is tested against classic calculated results of swept area method for next fish species: Azov anchovy, tulka, turbot and Black-Azov sea shad according to data collected during 2022. Results comparison of classic and modified through bootstrap stock assessment methods leads no significant deviations in mean value estimation. Maximum difference between mean estimates of stock size was 3,75%. Confidential intervals width difference between reviewed methods, in general, was not significant. Most valuable difference in confidential intervals was detected in BCa approach against classic method with quantile approach (due to methodological features of BCa in bias correction procedure). The new stock assessment approach for swept area method though bootstrap permit to calculate statistically valid estimates, their confidential intervals and perform input data validation. The absence of significant differences in the results by the classical and proposed methods indicates the further applicable possibility of classic method even in normality violation in source samples. The normality requirements in methodology of classic approach, probably, is redundant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚速海鱼类种群评估--通过引导法的扫区法
亚速海栖息地条件最近发生的变化使得扫面积方法的经典应用变得不一致。本文介绍了通过非参数自举法对水生生物资源种群评估方法进行修改的情况。针对以下鱼类物种,新方法与传统的扫面积法计算结果进行了对比测试:根据 2022 年收集的数据,对亚速鯷、多宝鱼、大菱鲆和黑-亚速海鲱进行了测试。经典方法与通过自举法修改的种群评估方法的结果比较显示,平均值估算没有显著偏差。种群规模平均估算值之间的最大差异为 3.75%。总体而言,两种方法的保密区间宽度差异不大。保密区间的最大差异出现在 BCa 方法与经典方法和量化方法之间(由于 BCa 方法在偏差校正程序方面的特点)。新的种群评估方法采用自举法(bootstrap),可以计算出统计有效的估计值及其保密区间, 并对输入数据进行验证。传统方法和拟议方法的结果没有明显差异,这表明即使在源样本违反正态性的情况下, 传统方法也有进一步适用的可能性。经典方法对正态性的要求可能是多余的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges in collecting age composition data from commercial catches of the Barents sea bottom fishes Patterns of variability of species composition of catches from the russian fishing vessels in the south-eastern Pacific ocean for 2015–2022 State regulation of fisheries Russian and mechanisms for its implementation Differentiation populations of the saffron cod Eleginus gracilis (Gadidae) of the cape Terpeniya, south-east and north-west of Sakhalin island using biological tags At the grand Newfoundland bank and Flemish cap bank
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1