‘I need readers to trust that this can happen’: relational realism in Catherine Bush’s and Doreen Vanderstoop’s climate crisis novels

Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.3828/bjcs.2024.3
Petra Fachinger
{"title":"‘I need readers to trust that this\n can\n happen’: relational realism in Catherine Bush’s and Doreen Vanderstoop’s climate crisis novels","authors":"Petra Fachinger","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.2024.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article demonstrates how, challenged by Amitav Ghosh’s claim that realist fiction is ill-suited to deal with the climate crisis, and inspired by Indigenous relational thinking, Catherine Bush and Doreen Vanderstoop turn to ‘relational realism’ in their recent novels. I argue that they use realist narrative strategies creatively to represent climate catastrophes as a symptom of the carbon economy. But rather than portraying a world that is radically different,\n Blaze Island\n and\n Watershed\n are concerned with everyday reality, are set in clearly identifiable Canadian geographies, and focus on the eco-anxieties of ordinary characters. In addition to discussing intergenerational climate justice and emphasising the need for Indigenous leadership in combating global warming, the two novels enter into conversation with Shakespeare’s\n The Tempest\n and early twentieth-century prairie realist novels respectively to tease out their ecological undercurrents and implications. In so doing, they foreground the interplay of realist narrative strategies and relational thinking to emphasise the creative potential of the novel in addressing climate change and the need for communities to come together to save the planet.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/bjcs.2024.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article demonstrates how, challenged by Amitav Ghosh’s claim that realist fiction is ill-suited to deal with the climate crisis, and inspired by Indigenous relational thinking, Catherine Bush and Doreen Vanderstoop turn to ‘relational realism’ in their recent novels. I argue that they use realist narrative strategies creatively to represent climate catastrophes as a symptom of the carbon economy. But rather than portraying a world that is radically different, Blaze Island and Watershed are concerned with everyday reality, are set in clearly identifiable Canadian geographies, and focus on the eco-anxieties of ordinary characters. In addition to discussing intergenerational climate justice and emphasising the need for Indigenous leadership in combating global warming, the two novels enter into conversation with Shakespeare’s The Tempest and early twentieth-century prairie realist novels respectively to tease out their ecological undercurrents and implications. In so doing, they foreground the interplay of realist narrative strategies and relational thinking to emphasise the creative potential of the novel in addressing climate change and the need for communities to come together to save the planet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
我需要读者相信这一切会发生":凯瑟琳-布什和多琳-范德斯托普的气候危机小说中的关系现实主义
阿米塔夫-高什(Amitav Ghosh)认为现实主义小说不适合应对气候危机,凯瑟琳-布什(Catherine Bush)和多琳-范德斯托普(Doreen Vanderstoop)受到这一说法的挑战,并受到土著关系思想的启发,在她们最近的小说中转向 "关系现实主义"。我认为,她们创造性地使用了现实主义叙事策略,将气候灾难表现为碳经济的症状。但《烈焰岛》和《分水岭》并没有描绘一个截然不同的世界,而是关注日常现实,以清晰可辨的加拿大地理环境为背景,关注普通人物的生态焦虑。除了讨论代际气候正义和强调原住民在应对全球变暖方面发挥领导作用的必要性之外,这两部小说还分别与莎士比亚的《暴风雨》和二十世纪早期的草原现实主义小说进行对话,以揭示其生态暗流和影响。在这样做的过程中,他们强调了现实主义叙事策略和关系思维的相互作用,强调了小说在应对气候变化方面的创造潜力,以及社区团结起来拯救地球的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1