Baseline Total Brain Volume predicts for changes in quality of life and overall survival after cranial radiotherapy in older patients with a Glioblastoma (GBM). Results from the prospective BRITER study

C. Lorimer, S. Mills, A. Chalmers, I. Coombes, G. Thompson, J. Glendenning, M. Radon, C. Jones, J. Brock, A. Williamson
{"title":"Baseline Total Brain Volume predicts for changes in quality of life and overall survival after cranial radiotherapy in older patients with a Glioblastoma (GBM). Results from the prospective BRITER study","authors":"C. Lorimer, S. Mills, A. Chalmers, I. Coombes, G. Thompson, J. Glendenning, M. Radon, C. Jones, J. Brock, A. Williamson","doi":"10.1093/nop/npae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Short-course partial brain radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy for older patients with GBM extends survival but there is no validated evidence for prediction of individual risk of acute radiotherapy related side effects.\n \n \n \n This prospective multicentre observational trial recruited patients with newly diagnosed GBM aged ≥ 65 planned for cranial radiotherapy. Baseline MRI scans were analysed for markers of brain resilience including relative total brain volume (ratio of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume to total intracranial volume (TIV)) and their relationship to change in quality of life (QoL).\n \n \n \n 126 patients enrolled: mean age 72 years (range 65-83). 77% had debulking surgery. 79% received radiotherapy with concurrent TMZ, 21% received palliative radiotherapy alone. Median OS was 10.7 months. After accounting for age, sex, treatment and baseline MoCA score, there was a relationship between baseline CSF:TIV and change in QoL score at 8 weeks post treatment. For each unit point of increase in CSF:TIV, there was a corresponding decrease in QoL score of 1.72 (95% CI -3.24 to -0.19 p=0.027). 35 participants were too unwell to complete questionnaires or had died by the 8 week follow up visit. In this subgroup, post hoc logistic regression showed baseline CSF:TIV was related to risk of non-attendance (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.80, p=0.042). Cox regression models showed baseline CSF:TIV was associated with worsened OS (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.66, p<0.001).\n \n \n \n This study provides evidence to support the use of an imaging biomarker to help assess the risk:benefit ratio for radiotherapy.\n","PeriodicalId":506567,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-Oncology Practice","volume":"151 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short-course partial brain radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy for older patients with GBM extends survival but there is no validated evidence for prediction of individual risk of acute radiotherapy related side effects. This prospective multicentre observational trial recruited patients with newly diagnosed GBM aged ≥ 65 planned for cranial radiotherapy. Baseline MRI scans were analysed for markers of brain resilience including relative total brain volume (ratio of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume to total intracranial volume (TIV)) and their relationship to change in quality of life (QoL). 126 patients enrolled: mean age 72 years (range 65-83). 77% had debulking surgery. 79% received radiotherapy with concurrent TMZ, 21% received palliative radiotherapy alone. Median OS was 10.7 months. After accounting for age, sex, treatment and baseline MoCA score, there was a relationship between baseline CSF:TIV and change in QoL score at 8 weeks post treatment. For each unit point of increase in CSF:TIV, there was a corresponding decrease in QoL score of 1.72 (95% CI -3.24 to -0.19 p=0.027). 35 participants were too unwell to complete questionnaires or had died by the 8 week follow up visit. In this subgroup, post hoc logistic regression showed baseline CSF:TIV was related to risk of non-attendance (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.80, p=0.042). Cox regression models showed baseline CSF:TIV was associated with worsened OS (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.66, p<0.001). This study provides evidence to support the use of an imaging biomarker to help assess the risk:benefit ratio for radiotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基线脑总量可预测老年胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者接受颅脑放疗后生活质量和总生存期的变化。前瞻性 BRITER 研究结果
对老年 GBM 患者进行短程部分脑放疗 +/- 化疗可延长生存期,但目前尚无有效证据预测急性放疗相关副作用的个体风险。 这项前瞻性多中心观察性试验招募了年龄≥65岁、计划接受头颅放疗的新诊断GBM患者。基线磁共振成像扫描分析了脑恢复能力的标志物,包括相对总脑容量(脑脊液(CSF)容量与颅内总容量(TIV)之比)及其与生活质量(QoL)变化的关系。 126名患者入选:平均年龄72岁(65-83岁)。77%的患者接受了切除手术。79%的患者同时接受了TMZ放疗,21%的患者仅接受了姑息性放疗。中位生存期为10.7个月。在考虑年龄、性别、治疗和基线MoCA评分后,基线CSF:TIV与治疗后8周的QoL评分变化之间存在关系。CSF:TIV 每增加一个单位点,QoL 得分相应减少 1.72(95% CI -3.24 至 -0.19 p=0.027)。有 35 名参与者因身体不适无法完成问卷调查,或在 8 周随访时死亡。在这一亚组中,事后逻辑回归显示基线 CSF:TIV 与未就诊风险有关(OR 1.35,95% CI 1.01 至 1.80,p=0.042)。Cox回归模型显示,基线CSF:TIV与OS恶化有关(HR 1.41,95% CI 1.19至1.66,p<0.001)。 这项研究为使用成像生物标志物帮助评估放疗的风险与获益比提供了证据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights from GoFundMe Posts: Analyzing GoFundMe Financial Aid Requests from Brain Tumor Patients in Ontario, Canada Simulation-Based Caregiving Skills Training for Family Members of High-Grade Glioma Patients Inequalities in access to neuro-oncology supportive care and rehabilitation: a survey of healthcare professionals’ perspectives Clinician Perspectives on Integrating Neuro-oncology and Palliative Care for Patients with High-Grade Glioma Burnout and career satisfaction in young neuro-oncology investigators: results of the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) young investigator survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1