Prevalence, regional distribution, and determinants of infertility in Uganda between 2006 and 2016: analysis of three Demographic and Health Surveys

D. Zaake, D. Amongin, L. Beňová, S. Kiwanuka, C. Nalwadda, Mary Nakafeero, Sara Riese, Anthony Kayiira, A. Asefa
{"title":"Prevalence, regional distribution, and determinants of infertility in Uganda between 2006 and 2016: analysis of three Demographic and Health Surveys","authors":"D. Zaake, D. Amongin, L. Beňová, S. Kiwanuka, C. Nalwadda, Mary Nakafeero, Sara Riese, Anthony Kayiira, A. Asefa","doi":"10.29392/001c.94212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low- and middle-income countries, particularly in the African region in-country distribution and determinants of infertility are understudied. In this study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence, regional distribution, and determinants of infertility in Uganda to inform programming. We estimated the prevalence of primary and secondary infertility among women aged 20-49 years using data from the three rounds of the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2006, 2011, and 2016, and compared the differences across geographic regions. We pooled data sets for all three years and conducted logistic regression to identify factors associated with infertility. We included 16,537 women aged 20-49 years for analysis of primary infertility and 12,628 for secondary infertility. The overall prevalence of infertility (pooled across the three surveys was 6.4%. The prevalence of primary infertility was 1.4% (95% Confidence interval, CI=1.0-1.8), 0.7% (95% CI=0.5-1.0) and 0.8% (95% CI=0.6-1.0) in 2006, 2011 and 2016, respectively. The prevalence of secondary infertility was 7.4% (95% CI=6.5-8.4), 6.9% (95% CI=5.9-8.0) and 7.1% (95% CI=6.4-7.9) in 2006, 2011, and 2016 respectively. The prevalence of primary infertility was similar across regions. Secondary infertility was highest in the Central (7.9%, 95% CI= 6.1-10.3, in 2016) and Northern regions (7.4%, 95% CI=6.1-8.9, in 2016). In all survey years, women with higher education had lower odds of secondary infertility compared to women with no education (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=0.54, 95% CI=0.35-0.83; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that the prevalence of primary infertility is similar across regions, whereas secondary infertility varies by region, with higher prevalence in Central and Northern regions. More research is required to understand the drivers behind the variation of secondary infertility across regions to inform policy and decision making.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.94212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low- and middle-income countries, particularly in the African region in-country distribution and determinants of infertility are understudied. In this study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence, regional distribution, and determinants of infertility in Uganda to inform programming. We estimated the prevalence of primary and secondary infertility among women aged 20-49 years using data from the three rounds of the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2006, 2011, and 2016, and compared the differences across geographic regions. We pooled data sets for all three years and conducted logistic regression to identify factors associated with infertility. We included 16,537 women aged 20-49 years for analysis of primary infertility and 12,628 for secondary infertility. The overall prevalence of infertility (pooled across the three surveys was 6.4%. The prevalence of primary infertility was 1.4% (95% Confidence interval, CI=1.0-1.8), 0.7% (95% CI=0.5-1.0) and 0.8% (95% CI=0.6-1.0) in 2006, 2011 and 2016, respectively. The prevalence of secondary infertility was 7.4% (95% CI=6.5-8.4), 6.9% (95% CI=5.9-8.0) and 7.1% (95% CI=6.4-7.9) in 2006, 2011, and 2016 respectively. The prevalence of primary infertility was similar across regions. Secondary infertility was highest in the Central (7.9%, 95% CI= 6.1-10.3, in 2016) and Northern regions (7.4%, 95% CI=6.1-8.9, in 2016). In all survey years, women with higher education had lower odds of secondary infertility compared to women with no education (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=0.54, 95% CI=0.35-0.83; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that the prevalence of primary infertility is similar across regions, whereas secondary infertility varies by region, with higher prevalence in Central and Northern regions. More research is required to understand the drivers behind the variation of secondary infertility across regions to inform policy and decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2006 年至 2016 年乌干达不孕症的发病率、地区分布和决定因素:对三次人口与健康调查的分析
中低收入国家,尤其是非洲地区的中低收入国家,对不孕症的国内分布和决定因素研究不足。在这项研究中,我们旨在估算乌干达不孕症的患病率、地区分布和决定因素,为制定计划提供参考。我们利用 2006 年、2011 年和 2016 年三轮乌干达人口与健康调查的数据估算了 20-49 岁女性中原发性和继发性不孕症的患病率,并比较了不同地理区域的差异。我们汇总了所有三个年份的数据集,并进行了逻辑回归,以确定与不孕症相关的因素。我们纳入了 16,537 名 20-49 岁女性进行原发性不孕症分析,纳入了 12,628 名女性进行继发性不孕症分析。不孕症的总体发病率(三次调查的总和)为 6.4%。2006年、2011年和2016年的原发性不孕症患病率分别为1.4%(95% 置信区间,CI=1.0-1.8)、0.7%(95% CI=0.5-1.0)和0.8%(95% CI=0.6-1.0)。2006年、2011年和2016年,继发性不孕症的患病率分别为7.4%(95% CI=6.5-8.4)、6.9%(95% CI=5.9-8.0)和7.1%(95% CI=6.4-7.9)。各地区的原发性不孕症发病率相似。继发性不孕在中部地区(7.9%,95% CI=6.1-10.3,2016 年)和北部地区(7.4%,95% CI=6.1-8.9,2016 年)最高。在所有调查年份中,与未受过教育的女性相比,受过高等教育的女性患继发性不孕症的几率较低(调整后的几率比,aOR=0.54,95% CI=0.35-0.83;P <0.001)。我们的研究结果表明,各地区的原发性不孕症发病率相似,而继发性不孕症则因地区而异,中部和北部地区的发病率较高。需要开展更多的研究,以了解继发性不孕症在不同地区出现差异背后的驱动因素,从而为政策制定和决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Nigeria’s surgical plan: leveraging media engagement for cleft lip and palate to drive advocacy for access to surgical healthcare Digital health interventions in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol Developing conceptual framework and methodological considerations in community-supported chronic disease management Using spirometry for screening and diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in primary health care: findings from a community health project in rural India Maternal health in cities: analysis of institutional maternal mortality and health system bottlenecks in Kampala City Uganda, 2016-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1