Reasoned Economic Innovations for General Equilibrium Competition

Revaz Lordkipanidze
{"title":"Reasoned Economic Innovations for General Equilibrium Competition","authors":"Revaz Lordkipanidze","doi":"10.11648/j.innov.20240501.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When some win, others lose, and this is a natural competitive process in an equilibrium economy. With objective competition of general equilibrium, maximum efficiency and optimal use and redistribution of resources are achieved. But some hidden external and internal monopolies interfere with such equilibrium in the microeconomic markets sectors, including entire regions and industries. Accordingly, equilibrium competition is disrupted, which requires adequate unexpected innovative protective mechanisms of the state and the international community. If government economic departments or corporate management watch all criminal activity of hidden monopolies with their hands folded in pockets, a temporary disruption of effective equilibrium competition could lead to protracted stagnation and “thrombotic shocks” in local and international markets. For an example of applying the above in practice, when predatory monopolies import agricultural products at artificially low dumping prices, which ruins even very successful local businessmen, it is necessary to establish import-substituting free zones with a reasonably calculated minimum tax to stimulate exports. In objects to recommend innovative economic (fiscal-managerial) mechanisms for maintaining effective equilibrium competition, in the article, using the methods of grouping and summarizing statistical data, a preliminary assessment of countries in need of international and government support was carried out and results were obtained to improve the proportions in the core of market competition and for ease the burden of reasoned free zonal taxation.\n","PeriodicalId":501598,"journal":{"name":"Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20240501.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When some win, others lose, and this is a natural competitive process in an equilibrium economy. With objective competition of general equilibrium, maximum efficiency and optimal use and redistribution of resources are achieved. But some hidden external and internal monopolies interfere with such equilibrium in the microeconomic markets sectors, including entire regions and industries. Accordingly, equilibrium competition is disrupted, which requires adequate unexpected innovative protective mechanisms of the state and the international community. If government economic departments or corporate management watch all criminal activity of hidden monopolies with their hands folded in pockets, a temporary disruption of effective equilibrium competition could lead to protracted stagnation and “thrombotic shocks” in local and international markets. For an example of applying the above in practice, when predatory monopolies import agricultural products at artificially low dumping prices, which ruins even very successful local businessmen, it is necessary to establish import-substituting free zones with a reasonably calculated minimum tax to stimulate exports. In objects to recommend innovative economic (fiscal-managerial) mechanisms for maintaining effective equilibrium competition, in the article, using the methods of grouping and summarizing statistical data, a preliminary assessment of countries in need of international and government support was carried out and results were obtained to improve the proportions in the core of market competition and for ease the burden of reasoned free zonal taxation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般均衡竞争的理性经济创新
有人赢,就有人输,这是均衡经济中的自然竞争过程。在一般均衡的客观竞争下,可以实现效率最大化、资源的最佳利用和再分配。但在微观经济市场部门,包括整个地区和行业,一些隐性的外部和内部垄断干扰了这种均衡。因此,均衡竞争被打破,这就需要国家和国际社会有足够的意想不到的创新保护机制。如果政府经济部门或企业管理层袖手旁观所有隐性垄断的犯罪活动,那么有效的均衡竞争的暂时中断就可能导致本地和国际市场的长期停滞和 "血栓性冲击"。在实践中应用上述观点的一个例子是,当掠夺性垄断企业以人为的低价倾销进口农产品,甚至毁掉了当地非常成功的商人时,有必要建立进口替代自由区,并合理计算最低税率,以刺激出口。为了建议创新的经济(财政-管理)机制,以维持有效的均衡竞争,文章利用统计数据分组和汇总的方法,对需要国际和政府支持的国家进行了初步评估,并得出了改善市场竞争核心比例和减轻合理的自由区税收负担的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organisational creativity on product innovation performance of SMEs: exploring mechanisms and boundary conditions The impact of financial feedback on the innovative activity of companies: the moderating role of corporate governance quality Response of Durum Wheat to Deficit Irrigation Tracing the evolutionary leaps and boundaries of digital platforms: a case study of Facebook Radically concrete or incrementally abstract? The contingent role of abstract and concrete framing in pitching novel ideas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1