Online peer-group mentoring: An innovative mentoring program within an Australian professional association

David Turner, Julie Elliott, Jill Thomas, Susan Garner, Martina Donkers
{"title":"Online peer-group mentoring: An innovative mentoring program within an Australian professional association","authors":"David Turner, Julie Elliott, Jill Thomas, Susan Garner, Martina Donkers","doi":"10.1177/1035719x241237326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes an online peer-group mentoring program to support career-long professional development, professional identity development, and stronger experiential peer-to-peer learning. It was developed in response to ongoing interest among members of the Australian Evaluation Society (AES), a professional association that aims to improve the theory, practice, and use of evaluation. It is intended to complement the technical training that can be provided through workshops or professional training and conventional one-on-one mentoring that members may access in other ways. Now in its third year, the program refined its focus and major objectives from promoting technical skills and knowledge to a broader focus on building professional networks, reducing professional isolation, and enhancing professional confidence. Two distinct approaches emerged from the first two years of the program, with each approach appealing to different participants. Some groups focused broadly on career development and professional network building, while others focused on topics of particular interest to participants. The peer-group approach is relevant to other professional associations in which practitioners tend to work alone or in small groups. Evaluation findings can inform other such associations about designing and implementing online group mentoring programs for their members.","PeriodicalId":508734,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x241237326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes an online peer-group mentoring program to support career-long professional development, professional identity development, and stronger experiential peer-to-peer learning. It was developed in response to ongoing interest among members of the Australian Evaluation Society (AES), a professional association that aims to improve the theory, practice, and use of evaluation. It is intended to complement the technical training that can be provided through workshops or professional training and conventional one-on-one mentoring that members may access in other ways. Now in its third year, the program refined its focus and major objectives from promoting technical skills and knowledge to a broader focus on building professional networks, reducing professional isolation, and enhancing professional confidence. Two distinct approaches emerged from the first two years of the program, with each approach appealing to different participants. Some groups focused broadly on career development and professional network building, while others focused on topics of particular interest to participants. The peer-group approach is relevant to other professional associations in which practitioners tend to work alone or in small groups. Evaluation findings can inform other such associations about designing and implementing online group mentoring programs for their members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线同侪小组指导:澳大利亚专业协会的创新指导计划
本文介绍了一项在线同侪小组指导计划,旨在支持职业生涯中的专业发展、专业身份发展以及更强的同侪经验学习。澳大利亚评估协会(AES)是一个旨在改进评估理论、实践和应用的专业协会。该计划旨在补充通过研讨会或专业培训提供的技术培训,以及会员可以通过其他方式获得的传统一对一指导。如今,该计划已进入第三个年头,其工作重点和主要目标也从提高技术技能和知识,调整为更广泛地关注建立专业网络、减少专业孤立和增强专业自信。在该计划的前两年中,出现了两种截然不同的方法,每种方法都对不同的参与者具有吸引力。一些小组广泛关注职业发展和专业网络建设,而另一些小组则关注参与者特别感兴趣的主题。同侪小组的方法与其他专业协会也有相关性,因为在这些协会中,从业人员往往是单独或以小组的形式开展工作。评估结果可以为其他此类协会设计和实施针对其成员的在线小组指导计划提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluator perspective: A conversation with the managing director of the Australian Centre for Evaluation (ACE) – Eleanor Williams How many interviews or focus groups are enough? The institutionalisation of evaluation in Asia-Pacific Evaluator perspective: A conversation with Australian Evaluation Society fellow – John Guenther ‘Fanning the flame’: Aboriginal girls, women, and their communities define success for the Shooting Stars empowerment program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1