Oncologic Drug Repository Programs in the United States: A Review and Comparison

Natalie K Heater, S. Kircher, Christine Weldon, J. Trosman, Al Benson
{"title":"Oncologic Drug Repository Programs in the United States: A Review and Comparison","authors":"Natalie K Heater, S. Kircher, Christine Weldon, J. Trosman, Al Benson","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As cancer affects forty percent of all Americans during their lifetime, the financial burden of cancer care represents a significant contribution towards the overall cost of healthcare in the United States. Cancer drug repository programs offer a unique solution for patients who have limited financial ability to access medications while reducing medical waste. We reviewed all state legislation in the United States regarding cancer drug repository programs. Five states have OACD-specific drug repository programs, while 28 states have generalized drug repository programs. Iowa’s state-wide, mail-order OACD repository program is the preeminent example of an effective and efficient program which should be replicated across the country. Many states have passed legislation allowing for drug repository programs but have struggled to translate such legislation into active programs due to lack of funding and management. We offer recommendations across policy, manufacturing, institutional, healthcare professional and patient domains in order provide optimal patient care.","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As cancer affects forty percent of all Americans during their lifetime, the financial burden of cancer care represents a significant contribution towards the overall cost of healthcare in the United States. Cancer drug repository programs offer a unique solution for patients who have limited financial ability to access medications while reducing medical waste. We reviewed all state legislation in the United States regarding cancer drug repository programs. Five states have OACD-specific drug repository programs, while 28 states have generalized drug repository programs. Iowa’s state-wide, mail-order OACD repository program is the preeminent example of an effective and efficient program which should be replicated across the country. Many states have passed legislation allowing for drug repository programs but have struggled to translate such legislation into active programs due to lack of funding and management. We offer recommendations across policy, manufacturing, institutional, healthcare professional and patient domains in order provide optimal patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的肿瘤药物储存库计划:回顾与比较
百分之四十的美国人一生中都会受到癌症的影响,因此癌症治疗的经济负担在美国医疗保健的总成本中占了很大比重。癌症药物储存库计划为经济能力有限的患者提供了一个独特的解决方案,既能减少医疗浪费,又能获得药物。我们审查了美国各州有关抗癌药物储存库计划的立法。其中 5 个州制定了专门针对 OACD 的药品储存库计划,28 个州制定了通用的药品储存库计划。爱荷华州的全州邮购 OACD 药品存放计划是有效和高效计划的杰出范例,应在全国范围内推广。许多州已通过立法允许实施药品储存库计划,但由于缺乏资金和管理,很难将此类立法转化为积极的计划。我们将从政策、生产、机构、医疗保健专业人员和患者等方面提出建议,以提供最佳的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States. Examining the use of telehealth to initiate buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1