The role of timely rheumatoid arthritis treatment effectiveness control

Larisa M. Musaeva, Yulia A. Prokofeva, I. Menshikova, Aishat E. Rasulova
{"title":"The role of timely rheumatoid arthritis treatment effectiveness control","authors":"Larisa M. Musaeva, Yulia A. Prokofeva, I. Menshikova, Aishat E. Rasulova","doi":"10.26442/20751753.2023.11.202606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Regular assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity is a key factor in therapy effectiveness improving. \nAim. To prove that timely RA treatment control recommended by modern guidelines improves outcomes and reduce disability in real clinical practice. \nMaterials and methods. Fourty patients with RA hospitalized at the University Clinical Hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were included into a retrospective single-center study and divided into 2 groups. In the first group, RA activity was monitored after 3, 6, and 12 months, with therapy adjusted if necessary. In the second group, monitoring of RA activity was carried out after 12 months. The patients underwent clinical, laboratory and instrumental examinations (Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC), common blood test with differential white blood cell count, ESR, biochemical blood test, CRP, RF, ACCP, hands, feet and chest X-ray, ECG). RA activity was assessed using DAS28, CDAI, SDAI indices in both groups. \nResults. RA activity control after 12 months in patients of the first group regularly observed by a rheumatologist was better than in patients of the second group, who visited rheumatologist again only in 12 months. DAS28 decreased significantly, from 4.71±0.80 to 3.08±0.70 in the group with regular monitoring during the observation period. Remission or low activity was achieved by 75% of patients (5% remission and 70% low activity). Less dynamics was registered in patients of the second group: the initial DAS28 was 4.50±0.74, DAS28 after 12 months was 4.36±0.64, which corresponds to moderate activity. Low activity was achieved in 15% of patients, remission was not achieved in any patient. \nConclusion. Strict adherence to the recommended terms for disease activity monitoring is necessary for successful RA treatment in real clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":10550,"journal":{"name":"Consilium Medicum","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consilium Medicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.11.202606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Regular assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity is a key factor in therapy effectiveness improving. Aim. To prove that timely RA treatment control recommended by modern guidelines improves outcomes and reduce disability in real clinical practice. Materials and methods. Fourty patients with RA hospitalized at the University Clinical Hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were included into a retrospective single-center study and divided into 2 groups. In the first group, RA activity was monitored after 3, 6, and 12 months, with therapy adjusted if necessary. In the second group, monitoring of RA activity was carried out after 12 months. The patients underwent clinical, laboratory and instrumental examinations (Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC), common blood test with differential white blood cell count, ESR, biochemical blood test, CRP, RF, ACCP, hands, feet and chest X-ray, ECG). RA activity was assessed using DAS28, CDAI, SDAI indices in both groups. Results. RA activity control after 12 months in patients of the first group regularly observed by a rheumatologist was better than in patients of the second group, who visited rheumatologist again only in 12 months. DAS28 decreased significantly, from 4.71±0.80 to 3.08±0.70 in the group with regular monitoring during the observation period. Remission or low activity was achieved by 75% of patients (5% remission and 70% low activity). Less dynamics was registered in patients of the second group: the initial DAS28 was 4.50±0.74, DAS28 after 12 months was 4.36±0.64, which corresponds to moderate activity. Low activity was achieved in 15% of patients, remission was not achieved in any patient. Conclusion. Strict adherence to the recommended terms for disease activity monitoring is necessary for successful RA treatment in real clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
及时控制类风湿关节炎治疗效果的作用
背景。定期评估类风湿关节炎(RA)的活动是提高治疗效果的关键因素。目的证明在实际临床实践中,现代指南所建议的及时控制 RA 治疗可提高疗效并减少残疾。材料和方法。将 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间在大学临床医院住院的 40 例 RA 患者纳入回顾性单中心研究,并将其分为 2 组。第一组在 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月后监测 RA 活动,必要时调整治疗方案。第二组在 12 个月后监测 RA 活动。患者接受了临床、实验室和仪器检查(关节触痛计数(TJC)和关节肿胀计数(SJC)、普通血液检查和白细胞计数差值、血沉、生化血液检查、CRP、RF、ACCP、手部、足部和胸部 X 光检查、心电图)。使用 DAS28、CDAI 和 SDAI 指数评估两组患者的 RA 活动性。结果显示12个月后,第一组定期接受风湿免疫科医生观察的患者的RA活动控制情况优于第二组患者,后者在12个月后才再次接受风湿免疫科医生的观察。在观察期间接受定期监测的组别中,DAS28 从(4.71±0.80)明显降低到(3.08±0.70)。75%的患者达到了缓解或低活动度(5%缓解,70%低活动度)。第二组患者的动态变化较小:最初的 DAS28 为 4.50±0.74,12 个月后的 DAS28 为 4.36±0.64,相当于中度活动。15%的患者达到低度活动,没有任何患者达到缓解。结论在实际临床实践中,严格遵守推荐的疾病活动监测条件是成功治疗RA的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Possibilities of noninvasive diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases associated with atherosclerosis Clinical case of mechanical and non-mechanical rhabdomyolysis complicated by acute kidney injury. Case report Hyperuricemia and acute decompensation of heart failure: is there a causative link? A review Extralobar pulmonary sequestration in an adult male with a heart defect. Case report Atherosclerosis and inflammation: Current therapeutic strategies. A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1