Autologous fat grafting and adipose-derived stem cells therapy for acute burns and burn-related scar: A systematic review

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_189_23
Fanny Evasari Lesmanawati, Carolus Aldo Windura, I. Saputro, Lynda Hariani
{"title":"Autologous fat grafting and adipose-derived stem cells therapy for acute burns and burn-related scar: A systematic review","authors":"Fanny Evasari Lesmanawati, Carolus Aldo Windura, I. Saputro, Lynda Hariani","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_189_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The objective of this study was to analyze all available research on the application of autologous fat grafting (AFG) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) to present evidence-based recommendations, particularly in the clinical treatment of acute burns and burn-related scars.\n \n \n \n We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, COCHRANE, and EMBASE, as well as a manual search of previous reviews’ reference lists up. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I, where appropriate.\n \n \n \n Six eligible studies were selected (2 randomized clinical trials [RCT], 1 retrospective cohort, and 3 experimental studies) with subjects ranging from 3 to 100. Only one study evaluated the use of AFG for acute burns. Improvements in wound healing, vascularization, scar characteristics, and tissue architecture were generally observed in some studies, supported by molecular markers, while one study reported nonsignificant results. Subjective patient satisfaction was reported to have improved. Functional outcomes improvement in the treated regions was minimal. However, study heterogeneity arose mainly from treatment protocols. Cautious results interpretation due to potential bias, especially in selection and confounding domains, and limited clinical trials are important to note. More studies are needed to evaluate.\n \n \n \n AFG and ADSC hold potential as valuable treatment options for burn-related scars, supported by a body of evidence, but further well-designed RCT are needed. The efficacy of acute burn settings is yet to be further evaluated since evidence is limited.\n","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_189_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to analyze all available research on the application of autologous fat grafting (AFG) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) to present evidence-based recommendations, particularly in the clinical treatment of acute burns and burn-related scars. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, COCHRANE, and EMBASE, as well as a manual search of previous reviews’ reference lists up. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I, where appropriate. Six eligible studies were selected (2 randomized clinical trials [RCT], 1 retrospective cohort, and 3 experimental studies) with subjects ranging from 3 to 100. Only one study evaluated the use of AFG for acute burns. Improvements in wound healing, vascularization, scar characteristics, and tissue architecture were generally observed in some studies, supported by molecular markers, while one study reported nonsignificant results. Subjective patient satisfaction was reported to have improved. Functional outcomes improvement in the treated regions was minimal. However, study heterogeneity arose mainly from treatment protocols. Cautious results interpretation due to potential bias, especially in selection and confounding domains, and limited clinical trials are important to note. More studies are needed to evaluate. AFG and ADSC hold potential as valuable treatment options for burn-related scars, supported by a body of evidence, but further well-designed RCT are needed. The efficacy of acute burn settings is yet to be further evaluated since evidence is limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗急性烧伤和烧伤相关瘢痕的自体脂肪移植和脂肪源性干细胞疗法:系统综述
摘要 本研究旨在分析有关自体脂肪移植(AFG)和脂肪源性干细胞(ADSC)应用的所有现有研究,以提出循证建议,尤其是在急性烧伤和烧伤相关疤痕的临床治疗中。 我们对PubMed、COCHRANE和EMBASE进行了系统检索,并对以往综述的参考文献列表进行了人工检索。我们酌情使用 RoB 2.0 和 ROBINS-I 评估了偏倚风险 (RoB)。 共筛选出 6 项符合条件的研究(2 项随机临床试验 [RCT]、1 项回顾性队列研究和 3 项实验研究),受试者从 3 人到 100 人不等。只有一项研究评估了 AFG 在急性烧伤中的应用。一些研究普遍观察到伤口愈合、血管生成、疤痕特征和组织结构有所改善,并得到分子标记物的支持,而一项研究报告的结果并不显著。据报道,患者的主观满意度有所提高。治疗区域的功能结果改善甚微。不过,研究的异质性主要来自治疗方案。需要注意的是,由于潜在的偏倚(尤其是在选择和混杂因素方面)以及有限的临床试验,对结果的解释必须谨慎。需要更多的研究来进行评估。 AFG和ADSC有可能成为治疗烧伤相关疤痕的重要选择,这一点已得到大量证据的支持,但仍需进一步开展设计良好的临床试验。由于证据有限,急性烧伤环境的疗效还有待进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy in the management of endophthalmitis after following the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: A systematic review and meta-analysis Exploring medical humanities from heterogeneous focus groups: A thematic analysis C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12-C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 signaling axis in cancer and the development of chemotherapeutic molecules. Do urinary tract infections affect the rate of periprosthetic joint infections in patients who underwent arthroplasty surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of muscle health impairment and atherosclerosis with major osteoporotic fracture risk in Taiwanese Vegetarians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1