Opioid-Sparing Effects of IV Acetaminophen for Patients Undergoing Surgery

Camille Santos, C. Lachance, Sharon Bailey
{"title":"Opioid-Sparing Effects of IV Acetaminophen for Patients Undergoing Surgery","authors":"Camille Santos, C. Lachance, Sharon Bailey","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nOpioids are often used to help manage postoperative pain. However, their consumption can cause side effects, in addition to the risk of developing dependence with long-term use. \nAcetaminophen is an alternative analgesic that may provide opioid-sparing benefits for patients undergoing surgery (e.g., the need for patients to use opioids later), but there is a lack of synthesized evidence to confirm. Acetaminophen is available in different formulations, such as IV, oral, and rectal. However, there is uncertainty around the benefits of using 1 formulation over another perioperatively. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nTo inform decisions about IV acetaminophen, we sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the effectiveness of IV acetaminophen to alternative analgesics (i.e., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), alternative formulations (i.e., oral or rectal acetaminophen), or placebo for reducing opioid consumption in patients undergoing surgery. \nA research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019, and January 9, 2024. The search was limited to English-language documents. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria. To investigate the true effect of IV acetaminophen, we excluded studies with any intraoperative opioid use. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nFor adult patients undergoing elective hip surgery, there may be no significant differences in cumulative opioid use between postoperative IV and oral acetaminophen (1 randomized controlled trial). \nFor patients undergoing elective cesarian delivery, postoperative IV acetaminophen may result in a decrease in total morphine consumption after surgery compared to placebo (1 randomized controlled trial). \nFor adult patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery, there may be no significant differences in total morphine consumption for patients receiving intraoperative IV acetaminophen compared to placebo (1 systematic review with 1 relevant RCT). \nWe did not find any studies comparing the opioid-sparing effects of IV acetaminophen to NSAIDs that met our criteria for this review. \n \nWhat Does It Mean? \n \nLimited evidence from this review suggests that the opioid-sparing effect of IV acetaminophen may vary across types of surgery when compared to placebo. Additionally, IV acetaminophen may not offer additional opioid-sparing benefits compared to oral administration. However, we require more comprehensive research with rigorous methodological approaches to understand this topic better. \nRelative to opioids, IV acetaminophen has a preferable side effect profile, including a low risk of dependence; therefore, decision-makers may wish to consider using this formulation in the surgical or postsurgical setting. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What Is the Issue? Opioids are often used to help manage postoperative pain. However, their consumption can cause side effects, in addition to the risk of developing dependence with long-term use. Acetaminophen is an alternative analgesic that may provide opioid-sparing benefits for patients undergoing surgery (e.g., the need for patients to use opioids later), but there is a lack of synthesized evidence to confirm. Acetaminophen is available in different formulations, such as IV, oral, and rectal. However, there is uncertainty around the benefits of using 1 formulation over another perioperatively. What Did We Do? To inform decisions about IV acetaminophen, we sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the effectiveness of IV acetaminophen to alternative analgesics (i.e., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), alternative formulations (i.e., oral or rectal acetaminophen), or placebo for reducing opioid consumption in patients undergoing surgery. A research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019, and January 9, 2024. The search was limited to English-language documents. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria. To investigate the true effect of IV acetaminophen, we excluded studies with any intraoperative opioid use. What Did We Find? For adult patients undergoing elective hip surgery, there may be no significant differences in cumulative opioid use between postoperative IV and oral acetaminophen (1 randomized controlled trial). For patients undergoing elective cesarian delivery, postoperative IV acetaminophen may result in a decrease in total morphine consumption after surgery compared to placebo (1 randomized controlled trial). For adult patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery, there may be no significant differences in total morphine consumption for patients receiving intraoperative IV acetaminophen compared to placebo (1 systematic review with 1 relevant RCT). We did not find any studies comparing the opioid-sparing effects of IV acetaminophen to NSAIDs that met our criteria for this review. What Does It Mean? Limited evidence from this review suggests that the opioid-sparing effect of IV acetaminophen may vary across types of surgery when compared to placebo. Additionally, IV acetaminophen may not offer additional opioid-sparing benefits compared to oral administration. However, we require more comprehensive research with rigorous methodological approaches to understand this topic better. Relative to opioids, IV acetaminophen has a preferable side effect profile, including a low risk of dependence; therefore, decision-makers may wish to consider using this formulation in the surgical or postsurgical setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚对手术患者的阿片类药物保护作用
问题出在哪里? 阿片类药物通常用于帮助控制术后疼痛。然而,服用阿片类药物可能会产生副作用,长期使用还有可能产生依赖性。对乙酰氨基酚是一种替代性镇痛药,可为接受手术的患者提供阿片类药物的优势(例如,患者以后不再需要使用阿片类药物),但目前还缺乏综合证据来证实这一点。对乙酰氨基酚有不同的剂型,如静脉注射、口服和直肠。然而,围手术期使用一种制剂比使用另一种制剂的益处尚不确定。 我们做了什么? 为了给关于静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚的决策提供信息,我们试图找出并总结文献,比较静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与替代镇痛药(即非甾体类抗炎药 [NSAIDs])、替代制剂(即口服或直肠注射对乙酰氨基酚)或安慰剂在减少手术患者阿片类药物用量方面的有效性。一位研究信息专家对2019年1月1日至2024年1月9日期间发表的同行评审文献和灰色文献进行了文献检索。检索仅限于英文文献。一位审稿人根据预先设定的标准筛选纳入文章。为了调查静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚的真实效果,我们排除了术中使用任何阿片类药物的研究。 我们发现了什么? 对于接受择期髋关节手术的成年患者,术后静脉滴注和口服对乙酰氨基酚在阿片类药物的累积用量上可能没有显著差异(1 项随机对照试验)。对于接受择期剖宫产手术的患者,与安慰剂相比,术后静脉滴注对乙酰氨基酚可能会减少术后吗啡的总用量(1 项随机对照试验)。对于接受腰椎间盘手术的成年患者,与安慰剂相比,术中静脉滴注对乙酰氨基酚的患者在吗啡总消耗量方面可能没有显著差异(1 篇系统综述和 1 篇相关的随机对照试验)。我们没有发现任何符合本综述标准的研究对静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚和非甾体抗炎药的阿片类药物节省效果进行比较。 这意味着什么? 本综述中的有限证据表明,与安慰剂相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚对阿片类药物的节省作用可能因手术类型而异。此外,与口服药物相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚可能不会提供更多的阿片类药物节省优势。然而,我们需要更全面的研究和严格的方法来更好地理解这一课题。与阿片类药物相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚具有更好的副作用,包括较低的依赖性风险;因此,决策者不妨考虑在手术或术后环境中使用这种制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relugolix (Orgovyx) Nabilone for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus in Canada 2023 Abstracts of the Canadian Association for Population Therapeutics The Development of a Model Validation Tool to Assist in the Conduct of Economic Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1