Perinephric Hematoma Size can be a Strong Prognostic Factor of Need of Surgical Intervention in High Grade Renal Trauma

El-Ouardi Khalid, Mouslim Othmane, Lakmichi Mohamed Amine, Dahami Zakaria, Moudouni Mohamed Said, Sarf Ismail
{"title":"Perinephric Hematoma Size can be a Strong Prognostic Factor of Need of Surgical Intervention in High Grade Renal Trauma","authors":"El-Ouardi Khalid, Mouslim Othmane, Lakmichi Mohamed Amine, Dahami Zakaria, Moudouni Mohamed Said, Sarf Ismail","doi":"10.36347/sasjm.2024.v10i03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: For the majority of renal injuries, non-operative management is the standard of care with nephrectomy reserved for those with severe trauma. The aim of our study is to assess the characteristics of perinephric hematoma and other prognostic factors of surgical intervention for high grade renal trauma independent of AAST OIS. Materials and Methods: A total of 119 patients with high grade renal trauma from January 2005 to September 2021 were identified for analysis. Hospital records and diagnostic imaging were reviewed to identify the need for surgical intervention, including total and partial nephrectomy. Factors examined include patient age, gender, ISS (Injury severity score), AAST-OIS, laceration location, length and number, perinephric hematoma characteristics, intravascular contrast extravasation and devitalised segment status. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were performed as appropriate. Results: Mean patient age was 31, 39 and mean ISS was 22, 80. A total of 24 surgical intervention were required (20%) including partial and total nephrectomy. On univariate analysis, hypotension on admission, hematoma diameter, degree of devitalised fragment superior of 25% and AAST OIS grade were associated with the need of surgical intervention. On multivariate analysis, only hypotension on admission (p: 0,029), hematoma diameter greater than 3,5 cm (p:0,021) and AAST-OIS grade (p: 0,010) remained independently associated with surgical intervention. Conclusions: Perinephric hematoma size remains among prognostic factors for surgical intervention that allow better stratification of renal lesions and its study allows a better management of high-grade renal trauma.","PeriodicalId":193141,"journal":{"name":"SAS Journal of Medicine","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sasjm.2024.v10i03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For the majority of renal injuries, non-operative management is the standard of care with nephrectomy reserved for those with severe trauma. The aim of our study is to assess the characteristics of perinephric hematoma and other prognostic factors of surgical intervention for high grade renal trauma independent of AAST OIS. Materials and Methods: A total of 119 patients with high grade renal trauma from January 2005 to September 2021 were identified for analysis. Hospital records and diagnostic imaging were reviewed to identify the need for surgical intervention, including total and partial nephrectomy. Factors examined include patient age, gender, ISS (Injury severity score), AAST-OIS, laceration location, length and number, perinephric hematoma characteristics, intravascular contrast extravasation and devitalised segment status. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were performed as appropriate. Results: Mean patient age was 31, 39 and mean ISS was 22, 80. A total of 24 surgical intervention were required (20%) including partial and total nephrectomy. On univariate analysis, hypotension on admission, hematoma diameter, degree of devitalised fragment superior of 25% and AAST OIS grade were associated with the need of surgical intervention. On multivariate analysis, only hypotension on admission (p: 0,029), hematoma diameter greater than 3,5 cm (p:0,021) and AAST-OIS grade (p: 0,010) remained independently associated with surgical intervention. Conclusions: Perinephric hematoma size remains among prognostic factors for surgical intervention that allow better stratification of renal lesions and its study allows a better management of high-grade renal trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾周围血肿大小是高度肾创伤是否需要手术干预的有力预后因素
背景:对于大多数肾损伤而言,非手术治疗是标准的治疗方法,肾切除术仅用于严重创伤的患者。我们的研究旨在评估肾周血肿的特征以及独立于 AAST OIS 的高级别肾创伤手术干预的其他预后因素。材料和方法:对 2005 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间的 119 例高度肾创伤患者进行分析。对医院记录和诊断成像进行审查,以确定是否需要手术干预,包括全肾和部分肾切除术。研究的因素包括患者年龄、性别、ISS(损伤严重程度评分)、AAST-OIS、裂伤位置、长度和数量、肾周血肿特征、血管内造影剂外渗和坏死节段状态。根据情况进行了描述性统计和二元逻辑回归。结果患者平均年龄为 31.39 岁,平均 ISS 为 22.80。共需要 24 次手术干预(20%),包括部分和全肾切除术。单变量分析显示,入院时低血压、血肿直径、超过25%的脱落碎片程度和AAST OIS分级与手术干预需求相关。在多变量分析中,只有入院时低血压(p: 0,029)、血肿直径大于 3.5 厘米(p:0,021)和 AAST-OIS 分级(p: 0,010)仍与手术干预相关。结论肾周血肿大小仍是手术干预的预后因素之一,可更好地对肾脏病变进行分层,对其进行研究可更好地处理高级别的肾脏创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unanticipated Gangrenous Cholecystitis in a Healthy Young Adult: A Case Report Highlighting the Role of Advanced Imaging Management of Strictures in Crohn's Disease: Surgery Versus Medical Treatment When Religion Gets Involved in the Treatment of Scabies: About A Case in the University Clinic of Dermatology and Venerology of ‘Centre National Hospitalier Universitaire Hubert Koutoukou Maga’ of Cotonou Imaging Characteristics of the Spheno-Orbital Meningioma: Literature Review Study of Microalbuminuria in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in the Reference Health Center of Commune VI of the Bamako District
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1