Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Shirin Hosseini, Saeid Hosseini, Zahra Vahdat Shariatpanahi, Majid Maleki, Fereydoon Noohi, Ziya Totonchi
{"title":"Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Shirin Hosseini, Saeid Hosseini, Zahra Vahdat Shariatpanahi, Majid Maleki, Fereydoon Noohi, Ziya Totonchi","doi":"10.59958/hsf.6885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Improving patients' outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) during the surgical period has significant economic savings and increases organizational productivity. We evaluated the effects of ERAS protocol on outcomes including high sensitive-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, feeding tolerance and pain score of cardiac surgical patients. Methods: A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to the ERAS and control groups according to stratified block randomization. Fasting time in the ERAS group reduced from the conventional 12 h to 6 h with light meals. Also, on the day of the operation, 2 hours before the surgery, they received 250 mL of oral carbohydrate solution containing 25 g glucose. The control group received conventional standard care. Serum hs-CRP was measured before and after the operation. Results: Out of 260 participants, 107 patients received protocolized care (ERAS group), and 103 patients received conventional standard care. Recommendations to follow the ERAS resulted in a significant reduction in hs-CRP relative to the control group (p = 0.001). Complaints about thirst, hunger, anxiety, and pain were significantly less in the intervention group than the control group (All p-values = 0.001). In addition, the length of hospitalization, ICU stay, ventilation time, and first mobility were significantly shorter in the ERAS group (All p-values = 0.001). Besides, the first postoperative meal started earlier in the intervention group than the control group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: ERAS approach can lead to improvement in postoperative inflammation, thirst, hunger, anxiety, pain, duration of hospitalization, duration of ICU stay, first mobility, and ventilation time.","PeriodicalId":503802,"journal":{"name":"The Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"83 9‐10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.6885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving patients' outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) during the surgical period has significant economic savings and increases organizational productivity. We evaluated the effects of ERAS protocol on outcomes including high sensitive-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, feeding tolerance and pain score of cardiac surgical patients. Methods: A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to the ERAS and control groups according to stratified block randomization. Fasting time in the ERAS group reduced from the conventional 12 h to 6 h with light meals. Also, on the day of the operation, 2 hours before the surgery, they received 250 mL of oral carbohydrate solution containing 25 g glucose. The control group received conventional standard care. Serum hs-CRP was measured before and after the operation. Results: Out of 260 participants, 107 patients received protocolized care (ERAS group), and 103 patients received conventional standard care. Recommendations to follow the ERAS resulted in a significant reduction in hs-CRP relative to the control group (p = 0.001). Complaints about thirst, hunger, anxiety, and pain were significantly less in the intervention group than the control group (All p-values = 0.001). In addition, the length of hospitalization, ICU stay, ventilation time, and first mobility were significantly shorter in the ERAS group (All p-values = 0.001). Besides, the first postoperative meal started earlier in the intervention group than the control group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: ERAS approach can lead to improvement in postoperative inflammation, thirst, hunger, anxiety, pain, duration of hospitalization, duration of ICU stay, first mobility, and ventilation time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏外科患者术后坚持强化恢复:随机临床试验
背景:在手术期间使用术后恢复强化方案(ERAS)改善患者的预后可显著节约经济成本并提高组织生产力。我们评估了ERAS方案对心脏手术患者高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、住院时间、重症监护室(ICU)停留时间、进食耐受性和疼痛评分等结果的影响。方法按照分层随机分组法,将260名患者随机分配到ERAS组和对照组。ERAS组的禁食时间从传统的12小时缩短至6小时,进食清淡。此外,在手术当天,即手术前 2 小时,他们还接受了 250 毫升含 25 克葡萄糖的碳水化合物口服溶液。对照组接受常规标准护理。手术前后测量血清 hs-CRP。结果显示在260名参与者中,107名患者接受了方案护理(ERAS组),103名患者接受了常规标准护理。与对照组相比,按照 ERAS 方案治疗的建议使 hs-CRP 显著降低(p = 0.001)。干预组患者对口渴、饥饿、焦虑和疼痛的抱怨明显少于对照组(所有 p 值均 = 0.001)。此外,ERAS 组的住院时间、重症监护室住院时间、通气时间和首次活动时间均明显短于对照组(所有 p 值均 = 0.001)。此外,与对照组相比,干预组的术后首次进餐时间更早(P = 0.001)。结论ERAS方法可改善术后炎症、口渴、饥饿、焦虑、疼痛、住院时间、重症监护室停留时间、首次活动时间和通气时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Serum Apelin and CD40L Expression Levels on Adverse Cardiovascular Events after PCI Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Quality of Life in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Transplantation Anomalous Origin of the Right Pulmonary Artery from the Ascending Aorta in a 10-Day-Old Boy: A Case Report Surgical Repair of Giant Dissecting Pulmonary Artery Aneurysm Associated with Atrial Septal Defect and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Case Report Rhythm or Blues: Managing the Electrical State of the Heart with Temporary Pacing Wires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1