Zora Honzlova, Imogen Stagg, L. Miller, Christine Norton, R. Moss‐Morris, L. Sweeney, V. Wileman
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 on trial participants' engagement with IBD-BOOST: a digital cognitive behavioural intervention","authors":"Zora Honzlova, Imogen Stagg, L. Miller, Christine Norton, R. Moss‐Morris, L. Sweeney, V. Wileman","doi":"10.12968/gasn.2024.22.2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with a randomised-controlled trial of an online-supported self-management intervention for fatigue, pain and urgency in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of the present study was to investigate how the pandemic affected engagement with the IBD-BOOST programme. Intervention participants were invited to complete an online survey at 6-month follow-up, including both pre-defined and open-ended questions. A mixed methods quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted. People who had participated in the online intervention (n= 354) were invited to answer questions about the impact of COVID-19 on their ability to engage with the online intervention A total of 171 (48.31%) responded to the survey, with their experiences of the pandemic encompassing both negative and positive impacts on their engagement, as well as those who felt that the pandemic had no impact. For those who reported negative impact (19.30%): the pandemic created additional work and home-life responsibilities, the pandemic-induced emotional and psychological burden contributed to decreased participation, and engagement was reduced due to direct COVID-19 infection. For those who reported a positive impact (9.94%): the pandemic allowed for increased time availability due to pandemic-induced lifestyle changes. For those who felt the pandemic had no impact (50.29%): adaptability helped to maintain their engagement. The remaining 20.47% of participants reported that they were uncertain, or that their involvement varied. For some participants, the pandemic negatively impacted their engagement. However, 60% reported that the pandemic had either no or a positive impact on their engagement with IBD-BOOST, indicating the resilience of online delivery of behavioural interventions.","PeriodicalId":52494,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Nursing","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2024.22.2.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with a randomised-controlled trial of an online-supported self-management intervention for fatigue, pain and urgency in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of the present study was to investigate how the pandemic affected engagement with the IBD-BOOST programme. Intervention participants were invited to complete an online survey at 6-month follow-up, including both pre-defined and open-ended questions. A mixed methods quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted. People who had participated in the online intervention (n= 354) were invited to answer questions about the impact of COVID-19 on their ability to engage with the online intervention A total of 171 (48.31%) responded to the survey, with their experiences of the pandemic encompassing both negative and positive impacts on their engagement, as well as those who felt that the pandemic had no impact. For those who reported negative impact (19.30%): the pandemic created additional work and home-life responsibilities, the pandemic-induced emotional and psychological burden contributed to decreased participation, and engagement was reduced due to direct COVID-19 infection. For those who reported a positive impact (9.94%): the pandemic allowed for increased time availability due to pandemic-induced lifestyle changes. For those who felt the pandemic had no impact (50.29%): adaptability helped to maintain their engagement. The remaining 20.47% of participants reported that they were uncertain, or that their involvement varied. For some participants, the pandemic negatively impacted their engagement. However, 60% reported that the pandemic had either no or a positive impact on their engagement with IBD-BOOST, indicating the resilience of online delivery of behavioural interventions.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Nursing is the leading journal for nurses working in gastroenterology, hepatology and stoma care. The journal publishes original research, clinical reviews and case studies that have been peer-reviewed by leading experts in the field, as well as news and expert analysis on best practice, professional development and healthcare policy. Each of the ten issues a year touches on a range of topics, from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), viral hepatitis and colorectal cancer to upper GI endoscopy, parenteral nutrition and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Gastrointestinal Nursing aims to help specialist nurses improve the quality of life of patients by delivering care that is evidence-based, cost-effective and patient-centred.