Socioeconomic disparity in stage at cancer diagnosis among patients with type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional study

Jing de Haan-Du, K. Groenier, N. Kleefstra, Bert van der Vegt, Sabine Siesling, G. Landman, G. H. de Bock
{"title":"Socioeconomic disparity in stage at cancer diagnosis among patients with type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Jing de Haan-Du, K. Groenier, N. Kleefstra, Bert van der Vegt, Sabine Siesling, G. Landman, G. H. de Bock","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disparities in cancer stage appear to exist by socioeconomic status (SES) in the Netherlands. We evaluated the association of SES and cancer stage among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated in primary care.This cross-sectional study linked data from the primary care Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes Project Integrating Available Care database for T2DM (n=71 648, 1998–2019) to a cancer registry and personal records database in the Netherlands. Only cancers (excluding all skin cancers) diagnosed after the onset of diabetes were included and grouped by stages (III–IV or 0–II). SES was estimated as low, intermediate or high based on postal codes and Dutch social research status scores. Logistic regression was performed, with stratification by sex and correction for age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes duration, glycaemic control and metformin use. ORs and 95% CI are reported.Of the 5087 males and 4021 females with any cancer, 50.1% and 53.7% had low SES, respectively. Compared with patients with high SES, the ORs for diagnosing cancer at stages III–IV in patients with low SES were 1.00 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.19) for males and 1.32 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.67) for females. However, the ORs varied by cancer type: breast, 1.46 (95% CI 0.90 to 2.39); male colorectal, 1.00 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.43); female colorectal, 1.72 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.77); prostate, 0.81 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.15); male lung, 1.06 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.80) and female lung, 2.56 (95% CI 1.32 to 4.95).Among patients treated for T2DM in Dutch primary care, our data suggest the need to target females with low SES to decrease inequalities in the early detection of colorectal and lung cancer.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disparities in cancer stage appear to exist by socioeconomic status (SES) in the Netherlands. We evaluated the association of SES and cancer stage among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated in primary care.This cross-sectional study linked data from the primary care Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes Project Integrating Available Care database for T2DM (n=71 648, 1998–2019) to a cancer registry and personal records database in the Netherlands. Only cancers (excluding all skin cancers) diagnosed after the onset of diabetes were included and grouped by stages (III–IV or 0–II). SES was estimated as low, intermediate or high based on postal codes and Dutch social research status scores. Logistic regression was performed, with stratification by sex and correction for age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes duration, glycaemic control and metformin use. ORs and 95% CI are reported.Of the 5087 males and 4021 females with any cancer, 50.1% and 53.7% had low SES, respectively. Compared with patients with high SES, the ORs for diagnosing cancer at stages III–IV in patients with low SES were 1.00 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.19) for males and 1.32 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.67) for females. However, the ORs varied by cancer type: breast, 1.46 (95% CI 0.90 to 2.39); male colorectal, 1.00 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.43); female colorectal, 1.72 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.77); prostate, 0.81 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.15); male lung, 1.06 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.80) and female lung, 2.56 (95% CI 1.32 to 4.95).Among patients treated for T2DM in Dutch primary care, our data suggest the need to target females with low SES to decrease inequalities in the early detection of colorectal and lung cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰基层医疗机构 2 型糖尿病患者癌症诊断阶段的社会经济差异:一项横断面研究
在荷兰,不同社会经济地位(SES)的人患癌症的阶段似乎存在差异。我们评估了在基层医疗机构接受治疗的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的社会经济地位与癌症分期之间的关系。这项横断面研究将来自基层医疗机构兹沃勒糖尿病门诊项目T2DM整合可用医疗数据库(n=71648,1998-2019年)的数据与荷兰的癌症登记和个人记录数据库联系起来。只有在糖尿病发病后确诊的癌症(不包括所有皮肤癌)才被纳入,并按分期(III-IV 期或 0-II 期)分组。根据邮政编码和荷兰社会研究状况评分,SES 被估计为低、中或高。根据性别进行分层,并对年龄、体重指数、吸烟、糖尿病病程、血糖控制和二甲双胍使用情况进行校正后,进行了逻辑回归。在 5087 名男性癌症患者和 4021 名女性癌症患者中,分别有 50.1% 和 53.7% 的患者社会经济地位较低。与高社会经济地位患者相比,低社会经济地位患者诊断出癌症处于 III-IV 期的男性 OR 值为 1.00(95% CI 0.84 至 1.19),女性为 1.32(95% CI 1.06 至 1.67)。然而,不同癌症类型的 ORs 有所不同:乳腺癌,1.46(95% CI 0.90 至 2.39);男性结直肠癌,1.00(95% CI 0.70 至 1.43);女性结直肠癌,1.72(95% CI 1.06 至 2.77);前列腺癌,0.81(95% CI 0.57 至 1.15);男性肺癌,1.06(95% CI 0.62 至 1.在荷兰初级医疗机构接受 T2DM 治疗的患者中,我们的数据表明有必要针对社会经济地位较低的女性,以减少结直肠癌和肺癌早期检测中的不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial health stigma related to COVID-19 disease among COVID-19 patients in Jordan: a comparative study Evaluating and mapping the evidence that screening for diabetic foot disease meets the criteria for population-wide screening: a scoping review Effectiveness of direct patient outreach with a narrative naloxone and overdose prevention video to patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy in the USA: the Naloxone Navigator randomised clinical trial Social media use and anxiety levels among school adolescents: a cross-sectional study in Kathmandu, Nepal Community childhood obesity assessment in elementary school, anthropometric indices as screening tools: a community cross-sectional study in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1