Empathy from dissimilarity: Multivariate pattern analysis of neural activity during observation of somatosensory experience

Roshni Lulla, Leonardo Christov-Moore, A. Vaccaro, N. Reggente, Marco Iacoboni, Jonas T. Kaplan
{"title":"Empathy from dissimilarity: Multivariate pattern analysis of neural activity during observation of somatosensory experience","authors":"Roshni Lulla, Leonardo Christov-Moore, A. Vaccaro, N. Reggente, Marco Iacoboni, Jonas T. Kaplan","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Empathy seems to rely on our ability to faithfully simulate multiple aspects of others’ inferred experiences, often using brain structures we would use during a similar experience. Much neuroimaging work in this vein has related empathic tendencies to univariate correlates of simulation strength or salience. However, novel evidence suggests that empathy may rely on the multivariate distinctiveness of these simulations. Someone whose representations of painful and non-painful stimulation are more distinct from each other may more accurately simulate that experience upon seeing somebody else experience it. We sought to predict empathic tendencies from the dissimilarity between neural activity patterns evoked by observing other people experience pain and touch and compared those findings to traditional univariate analyses. In support of a simulationist perspective, diverse observed somatosensory experiences were best classified by activation patterns in contralateral somatosensory and insular cortices, the same areas that would be active were the subject experiencing the stimuli themselves. In support of our specific hypothesis, the degree of dissimilarity between patterns for pain and touch in distinct areas was each associated with different aspects of trait empathy. Furthermore, the pattern dissimilarity analysis proved more informative regarding individual differences than analogous univariate analyses. These results suggest that multiple facets of empathy are associated with an ability to robustly distinguish between the simulated states of others at corresponding levels of the processing hierarchy, observable via the distinguishability of neural patterns arising with those states. Activation pattern dissimilarity may be a useful tool for parsing the neuroimaging correlates of complex cognitive functions like empathy.","PeriodicalId":507939,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Neuroscience","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Empathy seems to rely on our ability to faithfully simulate multiple aspects of others’ inferred experiences, often using brain structures we would use during a similar experience. Much neuroimaging work in this vein has related empathic tendencies to univariate correlates of simulation strength or salience. However, novel evidence suggests that empathy may rely on the multivariate distinctiveness of these simulations. Someone whose representations of painful and non-painful stimulation are more distinct from each other may more accurately simulate that experience upon seeing somebody else experience it. We sought to predict empathic tendencies from the dissimilarity between neural activity patterns evoked by observing other people experience pain and touch and compared those findings to traditional univariate analyses. In support of a simulationist perspective, diverse observed somatosensory experiences were best classified by activation patterns in contralateral somatosensory and insular cortices, the same areas that would be active were the subject experiencing the stimuli themselves. In support of our specific hypothesis, the degree of dissimilarity between patterns for pain and touch in distinct areas was each associated with different aspects of trait empathy. Furthermore, the pattern dissimilarity analysis proved more informative regarding individual differences than analogous univariate analyses. These results suggest that multiple facets of empathy are associated with an ability to robustly distinguish between the simulated states of others at corresponding levels of the processing hierarchy, observable via the distinguishability of neural patterns arising with those states. Activation pattern dissimilarity may be a useful tool for parsing the neuroimaging correlates of complex cognitive functions like empathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从差异中产生共鸣:观察体感体验时神经活动的多元模式分析
摘要 共情似乎依赖于我们忠实地模拟他人推断经验的多个方面的能力,通常会使用我们在类似经验中会使用的大脑结构。这方面的许多神经影像学研究都将移情倾向与模拟强度或显著性的单变量相关联。然而,新的证据表明,移情可能依赖于这些模拟的多变量独特性。如果一个人对痛苦刺激和非痛苦刺激的表征相互区别较大,那么当他看到别人经历这种体验时,他可能会更准确地模拟这种体验。我们试图通过观察他人体验疼痛和触觉所引起的神经活动模式之间的差异来预测移情倾向,并将这些结果与传统的单变量分析进行比较。为了支持模拟主义观点,我们通过对侧躯体感觉皮层和岛叶皮层的激活模式对观察到的不同躯体感觉体验进行了最佳分类,而这些区域正是受试者自己体验刺激时会活跃的区域。为了支持我们的特定假设,不同区域的疼痛和触觉模式之间的差异程度分别与特质移情的不同方面相关。此外,与类似的单变量分析相比,模式相似性分析更能反映个体差异。这些结果表明,移情的多个方面与在处理层次结构的相应水平上有力地区分他人模拟状态的能力有关,可通过这些状态所产生的神经模式的可区分性来观察。激活模式差异可能是解析移情等复杂认知功能神经影像相关性的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization and validation of multi-echo, multi-contrast SAGE acquisition in fMRI BOLD fMRI responses to amplitude-modulated sounds across age in adult listeners Developmental trajectories of the default mode, frontoparietal, and salience networks from the third trimester through the newborn period GABA levels decline with age: A longitudinal study Unveiling hidden sources of dynamic functional connectome through a novel regularized blind source separation approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1