Testing the Reliability of Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Epidermal Thickness and Distinguish Volar and Nonvolar Skin

Molly E. Baumann , Nina Rossa Haddad , Alyssa Salazar , W. Lee Childers , Shawn Farrokhi , Neil B. Goldstein , Brad D. Hendershot , Lisa Reider , Richard E. Thompson , Michael S. Valerio , Christopher L. Dearth , Luis A. Garza , Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC)
{"title":"Testing the Reliability of Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Epidermal Thickness and Distinguish Volar and Nonvolar Skin","authors":"Molly E. Baumann ,&nbsp;Nina Rossa Haddad ,&nbsp;Alyssa Salazar ,&nbsp;W. Lee Childers ,&nbsp;Shawn Farrokhi ,&nbsp;Neil B. Goldstein ,&nbsp;Brad D. Hendershot ,&nbsp;Lisa Reider ,&nbsp;Richard E. Thompson ,&nbsp;Michael S. Valerio ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Dearth ,&nbsp;Luis A. Garza ,&nbsp;Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC)","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In persons with limb loss, prosthetic devices cause skin breakdown, largely because residual limb skin (nonvolar) is not intended to bear weight such as palmoplantar (volar) skin. Before evaluation of treatment efficacy to improve skin resiliency, efforts are needed to establish normative data and assess outcome metric reliability. The purpose of this study was to use optical coherence tomography to (i) characterize volar and nonvolar skin epidermal thickness and (ii) examine the reliability of optical coherence tomography. Four orientations of optical coherence tomography images were collected on 33 volunteers (6 with limb loss) at 2 time points, and the epidermis was traced to quantify thickness by 3 evaluators. Epidermal thickness was greater (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) for volar skin (palm) (265.1 ± 50.9 μm, n = 33) than for both nonvolar locations: posterior thigh (89.8 ± 18.1 μm, n = 27) or residual limb (93.4 ± 27.4 μm, n = 6). The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was high for volar skin (0.887–0.956) but low for nonvolar skin (thigh: 0.292–0.391, residual limb: 0.211–0.580). Correlation improved when comparing only 2 evaluators who used the same display technique (palm: 0.827–0.940, thigh: 0.633–0.877, residual limb: 0.213–0.952). Despite poor inter-rater agreement for nonvolar skin, perhaps due to challenges in identifying the dermal–epidermal junction, this study helps to support the utility of optical coherence tomography to distinguish volar from nonvolar skin.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000237/pdfft?md5=ca164c01d75d7275d0fa882b22a3633a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000237-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In persons with limb loss, prosthetic devices cause skin breakdown, largely because residual limb skin (nonvolar) is not intended to bear weight such as palmoplantar (volar) skin. Before evaluation of treatment efficacy to improve skin resiliency, efforts are needed to establish normative data and assess outcome metric reliability. The purpose of this study was to use optical coherence tomography to (i) characterize volar and nonvolar skin epidermal thickness and (ii) examine the reliability of optical coherence tomography. Four orientations of optical coherence tomography images were collected on 33 volunteers (6 with limb loss) at 2 time points, and the epidermis was traced to quantify thickness by 3 evaluators. Epidermal thickness was greater (P < .01) for volar skin (palm) (265.1 ± 50.9 μm, n = 33) than for both nonvolar locations: posterior thigh (89.8 ± 18.1 μm, n = 27) or residual limb (93.4 ± 27.4 μm, n = 6). The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was high for volar skin (0.887–0.956) but low for nonvolar skin (thigh: 0.292–0.391, residual limb: 0.211–0.580). Correlation improved when comparing only 2 evaluators who used the same display technique (palm: 0.827–0.940, thigh: 0.633–0.877, residual limb: 0.213–0.952). Despite poor inter-rater agreement for nonvolar skin, perhaps due to challenges in identifying the dermal–epidermal junction, this study helps to support the utility of optical coherence tomography to distinguish volar from nonvolar skin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试光学相干断层扫描测量表皮厚度和区分外侧与非外侧皮肤的可靠性
对于肢体缺失者来说,假肢装置会导致皮肤破损,这主要是因为残肢皮肤(非瓣膜)不像掌跖(外侧)皮肤那样需要承受重量。在评估改善皮肤弹性的治疗效果之前,需要努力建立标准数据并评估结果指标的可靠性。本研究的目的是使用光学相干断层扫描来(i)描述外侧和非外侧皮肤表皮厚度的特征,(ii)检查光学相干断层扫描的可靠性。研究人员在 2 个时间点采集了 33 名志愿者(其中 6 人肢体缺失)的四个方向的光学相干断层扫描图像,并由 3 名评估人员对表皮进行描记以量化厚度。与大腿后侧(89.8 ± 18.1 μm,n = 27)或残肢(93.4 ± 27.4 μm,n = 6)这两个非肢体部位相比,掌侧皮肤(265.1 ± 50.9 μm,n = 33)的表皮厚度更大(P < .01)。评分者之间的类内相关系数在伏侧皮肤上较高(0.887-0.956),但在非伏侧皮肤上较低(大腿:0.292-0.391,残肢:0.211-0.580)。如果仅对使用相同显示技术的两名评估者进行比较,相关性会有所提高(手掌:0.827-0.940;大腿:0.633-0.877;残肢:0.213-0.952)。尽管也许是由于在识别真皮-表皮交界处时存在困难,非伏皮肤的评分者间一致性较差,但这项研究有助于支持光学相干断层扫描在区分伏皮肤和非伏皮肤方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cover 1 Corrigendum to ‘Proteomic Profiling of CCCA Reveals Role of Humoral Immune Response Pathway and Metabolic Dysregulation’ JID Innovations, Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2024, 100263 Identification of Associations with Dermatologic Diseases through a Focused GWAS of the UK Biobank From Plant to Patient: A Historical Perspective and Review of Selected Medicinal Plants in Dermatology Spatial Transcriptomics in Inflammatory Skin Diseases Using GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling: A Practical Guide for Applications in Dermatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1