Preventable suicides involving medicines: A systematic case series of coroners’ reports in England and Wales

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100491
G. Anthony , J.K. Aronson , R. Brittain , C. Heneghan , G.C. Richards
{"title":"Preventable suicides involving medicines: A systematic case series of coroners’ reports in England and Wales","authors":"G. Anthony ,&nbsp;J.K. Aronson ,&nbsp;R. Brittain ,&nbsp;C. Heneghan ,&nbsp;G.C. Richards","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In England and Wales coroners have a duty to write a report, called a Prevention of Future Deaths report or PFD, when they believe that actions should be taken to prevent future deaths. Coroners send PFDs to individuals and organisations who are required to respond within 56 days. Despite the increase in mental health concerns and growing use of medicines, deaths reported by coroners that have involved medicine-related suicides had not yet been explored. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically assess coroners’ PFD reports involving suicides in which a medicine caused or contributed to the death to identify lessons for suicide prevention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the Preventable Deaths Tracker database (<span>https://preventabledeathstracker.net/</span><svg><path></path></svg>), 3037 coroners' PFD reports in England and Wales were screened for eligibility between July 2013 and December 2019. Reports were included if they involved suicide or intentional self-harm and prescribed or over-the-counter medication; illicit drugs were excluded. Following data extraction, descriptive statistics, document and content analysis were performed to assess coroners’ concerns and the recipients of reports.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 734 suicide-related coroner reports, with 100 (14%) reporting a medicine. Opioids (40%) were the most common class involved, followed by antidepressants (30%). There was wide geographical variation in the writing of reports; coroners in Manchester wrote the most (18%). Coroners expressed 237 concerns; the most common were procedural inadequacies (14%, n = 32), inadequate documentation and communication (10%, n = 22), and inappropriate prescription access (9%, n = 21). 203 recipients received the PFDs, with most sent to NHS trusts (31%), clinical commissioning groups (10%), and general practices (10%), of which only 58% responded to the coroner.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>One in four coroner reports in England and Wales involved suicides, with one in seven suicide-related deaths involving a medicine. Concerns raised by coroners highlighted gaps in care that require action from the Government, health services, and prescribers to aid suicide prevention. Coroner reports should be routinely used and monitored to inform public health policy, disseminated nationally, and responses to coroners should be transparently enforced so that actions are taken to prevent future suicides.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000284/pdfft?md5=bf5d87d6da9b889902b885733cc7ff04&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000284-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In England and Wales coroners have a duty to write a report, called a Prevention of Future Deaths report or PFD, when they believe that actions should be taken to prevent future deaths. Coroners send PFDs to individuals and organisations who are required to respond within 56 days. Despite the increase in mental health concerns and growing use of medicines, deaths reported by coroners that have involved medicine-related suicides had not yet been explored. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically assess coroners’ PFD reports involving suicides in which a medicine caused or contributed to the death to identify lessons for suicide prevention.

Methods

Using the Preventable Deaths Tracker database (https://preventabledeathstracker.net/), 3037 coroners' PFD reports in England and Wales were screened for eligibility between July 2013 and December 2019. Reports were included if they involved suicide or intentional self-harm and prescribed or over-the-counter medication; illicit drugs were excluded. Following data extraction, descriptive statistics, document and content analysis were performed to assess coroners’ concerns and the recipients of reports.

Results

There were 734 suicide-related coroner reports, with 100 (14%) reporting a medicine. Opioids (40%) were the most common class involved, followed by antidepressants (30%). There was wide geographical variation in the writing of reports; coroners in Manchester wrote the most (18%). Coroners expressed 237 concerns; the most common were procedural inadequacies (14%, n = 32), inadequate documentation and communication (10%, n = 22), and inappropriate prescription access (9%, n = 21). 203 recipients received the PFDs, with most sent to NHS trusts (31%), clinical commissioning groups (10%), and general practices (10%), of which only 58% responded to the coroner.

Conclusions

One in four coroner reports in England and Wales involved suicides, with one in seven suicide-related deaths involving a medicine. Concerns raised by coroners highlighted gaps in care that require action from the Government, health services, and prescribers to aid suicide prevention. Coroner reports should be routinely used and monitored to inform public health policy, disseminated nationally, and responses to coroners should be transparently enforced so that actions are taken to prevent future suicides.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可预防的药物自杀:英格兰和威尔士验尸官报告的系统性案例系列
背景在英格兰和威尔士,当验尸官认为应采取行动防止未来死亡事件发生时,他们有责任撰写一份报告,称为 "防止未来死亡报告 "或 "PFD"。死因裁判官会将预防未来死亡报告发送给个人和组织,并要求他们在 56 天内做出回应。尽管精神健康问题日益突出,药物的使用量也在不断增加,但死因裁判官报告的与药物相关的自杀死亡案例尚未得到探讨。因此,本研究旨在系统地评估死因裁判官报告的涉及药物导致或促成死亡的自杀事件,以找出预防自杀的经验教训。方法利用可预防死亡追踪数据库(https://preventabledeathstracker.net/),筛选出2013年7月至2019年12月期间英格兰和威尔士的3037份死因裁判官报告。如果报告涉及自杀或蓄意自残以及处方药或非处方药,则将其纳入其中;非法药物除外。在提取数据后,进行了描述性统计、文件和内容分析,以评估验尸官关注的问题和报告的接收者。结果共有734份与自杀相关的验尸官报告,其中100份(14%)报告了药物。阿片类药物(40%)是最常见的药物类别,其次是抗抑郁药(30%)。撰写报告的地域差异很大;曼彻斯特的验尸官撰写的报告最多(18%)。死因裁判官表达了 237 项关切;最常见的是程序不当(14%,n = 32)、文件记录和沟通不足(10%,n = 22)以及处方获取不当(9%,n = 21)。英格兰和威尔士每四份验尸官报告中就有一份涉及自杀,每七份自杀相关死亡中就有一份涉及药物。验尸官提出的问题凸显了护理方面的不足,需要政府、医疗服务机构和处方医生采取行动来帮助预防自杀。验尸官的报告应得到例行使用和监测,以便为公共卫生政策提供信息,并在全国范围内传播,对验尸官的回应应透明执行,以便采取行动预防未来的自杀事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1