Biomarker Analysis Provides Evidence for Host Response Homogeneity in Patients With COVID-19

Rombout B.E. van Amstel MD , Erik H.A. Michels MD , Brent Appelman MD , Justin de Brabander MD , Patrick J. Smeele MD , Tom van der Poll MD, PhD , Alexander P.J. Vlaar MD, PhD , Lonneke A. van Vught MD, PhD , Lieuwe D.J. Bos MD, PhD , the Amsterdam UMC COVID-19 Biobank Study Group
{"title":"Biomarker Analysis Provides Evidence for Host Response Homogeneity in Patients With COVID-19","authors":"Rombout B.E. van Amstel MD ,&nbsp;Erik H.A. Michels MD ,&nbsp;Brent Appelman MD ,&nbsp;Justin de Brabander MD ,&nbsp;Patrick J. Smeele MD ,&nbsp;Tom van der Poll MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander P.J. Vlaar MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lonneke A. van Vught MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lieuwe D.J. Bos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;the Amsterdam UMC COVID-19 Biobank Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The exploration of subphenotypes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 has garnered substantial attention. Most existing studies operate under the assumption of heterogeneity in COVID-19 patient populations, and this assumption can lead to erroneous conclusions.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Do plasma biomarker profiles reflective of various pathophysiologic pathways provide evidence for heterogeneity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This is a secondary analysis of two prospective observational studies of adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19-related respiratory failure in the general ward and ICU of two medical centers and with 44 host response biomarkers available. Parsimonious models were used to allocate and validate ARDS inflammatory subphenotypes. Novel biological subphenotypes were identified using latent profile analysis (LPA) and hierarchical clustering. Heterogeneity of treatment effect for corticosteroids was assessed using an interaction term in a logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cohort consisted of 162 patients admitted to the ICU and 464 patients admitted to the ward. Using the parsimonious models in ICU patients, only 3.1% to 13% of patients were classified as hyperinflammatory subphenotype. Using de novo subphenotyping techniques, neither clustering nor LPA revealed significant evidence for heterogeneity in the ward (<em>P</em> = .11-.13), ICU (<em>P</em> = .23-.88), or combined cohort (<em>P</em> = .05-.88). Adding clinical variables did not alter results in the ICU or combined cohort. Using the combined approach in the ward cohort, indices provided borderline significance for two subphenotypes, and there was good agreement between clustering and LPA (87.9%), but no heterogeneity of treatment effect for corticosteroids was observed between these two classes (<em>P</em> = .198).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Systemic inflammatory subphenotypes derived from patients with ARDS did not reflect the variation in severity of COVID-19 in this study. Empirical evidence, derived from cluster analysis or LPA, offers limited support for biological heterogeneity in COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000169/pdfft?md5=23f368aa8ea0fa264b1390baa2d98c1c&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788424000169-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The exploration of subphenotypes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 has garnered substantial attention. Most existing studies operate under the assumption of heterogeneity in COVID-19 patient populations, and this assumption can lead to erroneous conclusions.

Research Question

Do plasma biomarker profiles reflective of various pathophysiologic pathways provide evidence for heterogeneity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19?

Study Design and Methods

This is a secondary analysis of two prospective observational studies of adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19-related respiratory failure in the general ward and ICU of two medical centers and with 44 host response biomarkers available. Parsimonious models were used to allocate and validate ARDS inflammatory subphenotypes. Novel biological subphenotypes were identified using latent profile analysis (LPA) and hierarchical clustering. Heterogeneity of treatment effect for corticosteroids was assessed using an interaction term in a logistic regression model.

Results

The cohort consisted of 162 patients admitted to the ICU and 464 patients admitted to the ward. Using the parsimonious models in ICU patients, only 3.1% to 13% of patients were classified as hyperinflammatory subphenotype. Using de novo subphenotyping techniques, neither clustering nor LPA revealed significant evidence for heterogeneity in the ward (P = .11-.13), ICU (P = .23-.88), or combined cohort (P = .05-.88). Adding clinical variables did not alter results in the ICU or combined cohort. Using the combined approach in the ward cohort, indices provided borderline significance for two subphenotypes, and there was good agreement between clustering and LPA (87.9%), but no heterogeneity of treatment effect for corticosteroids was observed between these two classes (P = .198).

Interpretation

Systemic inflammatory subphenotypes derived from patients with ARDS did not reflect the variation in severity of COVID-19 in this study. Empirical evidence, derived from cluster analysis or LPA, offers limited support for biological heterogeneity in COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物分析为 COVID-19 患者的宿主反应同质性提供了证据
研究背景对 COVID-19 住院患者亚表型的探索引起了广泛关注。研究设计与方法这是对两项前瞻性观察性研究的二次分析,研究对象是在两家医疗中心的普通病房和重症监护室中因 COVID-19 相关呼吸衰竭住院的成人患者,有 44 种宿主反应生物标记物可用。研究采用了拟真模型来分配和验证 ARDS 炎症亚型。利用潜在特征分析(LPA)和分层聚类确定了新的生物亚型。利用逻辑回归模型中的交互项评估了皮质类固醇治疗效果的异质性。在重症监护室患者中使用拟态模型,只有3.1%至13%的患者被归类为高炎症亚表型。在病房(P = .11-.13)、重症监护室(P = .23-.88)或联合队列(P = .05-.88)中,使用从头分型技术,聚类或 LPA 均未显示出显著的异质性证据。增加临床变量并不会改变重症监护室或合并队列的结果。在病房队列中使用合并方法,指数为两个亚型提供了边缘显著性,聚类与 LPA(87.9%)之间有很好的一致性,但在这两类患者中未观察到皮质类固醇治疗效果的异质性(P = .198)。聚类分析或 LPA 得出的经验证据为 COVID-19 的生物异质性提供了有限的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Initial Opioid Exposure in the ICU and 1-Year Opioid-Related Outcomes in Patients Who Are Mechanically Ventilated The New Global Definition of ARDS Anti-CD14 Treatment in Patients With Severe COVID-19 Clinical and Biological Effects in a Phase 2 Randomized Open-Label Adaptive Platform Clinical Trial Developing Core Outcome (Measurement) Sets for Critical Care Research Using the Modified Delphi Method Managing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in the ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1