Longitudinal stability of cortical grey matter measures varies across brain regions, imaging metrics, and testing sites in the ABCD study

Sam Parsons, A. Brandmaier, U. Lindenberger, R. Kievit
{"title":"Longitudinal stability of cortical grey matter measures varies across brain regions, imaging metrics, and testing sites in the ABCD study","authors":"Sam Parsons, A. Brandmaier, U. Lindenberger, R. Kievit","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a vital tool for the study of brain structure and function. It is increasingly being used in individual differences research to examine brain-behaviour associations. Prior work has demonstrated low test-retest stability of functional MRI measures, highlighting the need to examine the longitudinal stability (test-retest reliability across long timespans) of MRI measures across brain regions and imaging metrics, particularly in adolescence. In this study, we examined the longitudinal stability of grey matter measures (cortical thickness, surface area, and volume) across brain regions, and testing sites in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study release v4.0. Longitudinal stability ICC estimates ranged from 0 to .98, depending on the measure, parcellation, and brain region. We used Intra-Class Effect Decomposition (ICED) to estimate between-subjects variance and error variance, and assess the relative contribution of each across brain regions and testing sites on longitudinal stability. In further exploratory analyses, we examined the influence of parcellation used (Desikan-Killiany-Tourville and Destrieux) on longitudinal stability. Our results highlight meaningful heterogeneity in longitudinal stability across brain regions, structural measures (cortical thickness in particular), parcellations, and ABCD testing sites. Differences in longitudinal stability across brain regions were largely driven by between-subjects variance, whereas differences in longitudinal stability across testing sites were largely driven by differences in error variance. We argue that investigations such as this are essential to capture patterns of longitudinal stability heterogeneity that would otherwise go undiagnosed. Such improved understanding allows the field to more accurately interpret results, compare effect sizes, and plan more powerful studies.","PeriodicalId":507939,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Neuroscience","volume":"186 ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a vital tool for the study of brain structure and function. It is increasingly being used in individual differences research to examine brain-behaviour associations. Prior work has demonstrated low test-retest stability of functional MRI measures, highlighting the need to examine the longitudinal stability (test-retest reliability across long timespans) of MRI measures across brain regions and imaging metrics, particularly in adolescence. In this study, we examined the longitudinal stability of grey matter measures (cortical thickness, surface area, and volume) across brain regions, and testing sites in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study release v4.0. Longitudinal stability ICC estimates ranged from 0 to .98, depending on the measure, parcellation, and brain region. We used Intra-Class Effect Decomposition (ICED) to estimate between-subjects variance and error variance, and assess the relative contribution of each across brain regions and testing sites on longitudinal stability. In further exploratory analyses, we examined the influence of parcellation used (Desikan-Killiany-Tourville and Destrieux) on longitudinal stability. Our results highlight meaningful heterogeneity in longitudinal stability across brain regions, structural measures (cortical thickness in particular), parcellations, and ABCD testing sites. Differences in longitudinal stability across brain regions were largely driven by between-subjects variance, whereas differences in longitudinal stability across testing sites were largely driven by differences in error variance. We argue that investigations such as this are essential to capture patterns of longitudinal stability heterogeneity that would otherwise go undiagnosed. Such improved understanding allows the field to more accurately interpret results, compare effect sizes, and plan more powerful studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 ABCD 研究中,大脑皮层灰质测量值的纵向稳定性因大脑区域、成像指标和测试地点而异
摘要 磁共振成像(MRI)是研究大脑结构和功能的重要工具。它越来越多地被用于个体差异研究,以检查大脑与行为之间的关联。先前的研究表明,功能性核磁共振成像测量的重测稳定性较低,这突出表明有必要研究核磁共振成像测量在不同脑区和成像指标之间的纵向稳定性(长时间跨度的重测可靠性),尤其是在青少年时期。在本研究中,我们考察了青少年脑认知发展(ABCD)研究 v4.0 版中灰质测量(皮质厚度、表面积和体积)在不同脑区和测试点的纵向稳定性。纵向稳定性 ICC 估计值从 0 到 0.98 不等,具体取决于测量指标、划分和脑区。我们使用类内效应分解(ICED)来估计受试者之间的方差和误差方差,并评估各脑区和测试点对纵向稳定性的相对贡献。在进一步的探索性分析中,我们考察了所使用的解析法(Desikan-Killiany-Tourville 和 Destrieux)对纵向稳定性的影响。我们的结果凸显了不同脑区、结构测量(尤其是皮层厚度)、分割和ABCD测试点之间纵向稳定性的显著异质性。不同脑区的纵向稳定性差异主要由受试者之间的方差驱动,而不同测试点的纵向稳定性差异主要由误差方差驱动。我们认为,这样的研究对于捕捉纵向稳定性异质性的模式至关重要,否则这些异质性将无法被诊断出来。加深对纵向稳定性异质性的理解,可以让相关领域更准确地解释结果、比较效应大小并规划更有力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization and validation of multi-echo, multi-contrast SAGE acquisition in fMRI BOLD fMRI responses to amplitude-modulated sounds across age in adult listeners Developmental trajectories of the default mode, frontoparietal, and salience networks from the third trimester through the newborn period GABA levels decline with age: A longitudinal study Unveiling hidden sources of dynamic functional connectome through a novel regularized blind source separation approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1