Etiology of purulent-inflammatory infections in injuries caused by combat operations and sensitivity of pathogens to antimicrobial preparations

N.O. Latina, O. Surmasheva
{"title":"Etiology of purulent-inflammatory infections in injuries caused by combat operations and sensitivity of pathogens to antimicrobial preparations","authors":"N.O. Latina, O. Surmasheva","doi":"10.32402/dovkil2024.01.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to investigate the etiological structure of purulent-inflammatory infections in injuries that occurred because of hostilities in Ukraine and to assess the antibiotic resistance of isolated pathogens. Materials and methods: Collection and transportation of samples of biological material from patients with injuries was carried out in accordance with the general principles of selection and transportation. Sowing, selection and identification of isolates was carried out by routine methods using the EUCAST methodology for determining the sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs by the disk diffusion method. Research results and their discussion: During the conduct of 154 microbiological studies of the wound contents of the wounded, 110 isolates were isolated and identified - 97 strains of opportunistic microorganisms and 13 strains of yeast-like fungi. At the same time, 68.2% of cultures were found in monoculture, and 31.8% in associations. To a greater extent, representatives of the gram-positive cocca flora were isolated from the wounded patients - 72.2%: Staphylococci (77.1%), Enterococci (14.3%), Streptococci (8.6%). Among the Staphylococci the following stood out Staphylococcus aureus (72.8%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (5.9%). Among Enterococci the following stood out Enterococcus faecalis (12.8%), Enterococcus faecium (1.4%). Among Streptococci, Streptococcus pyogenes stood out - 11.8%. To a less extent, gram-negative bacteria were released from the wounded patients - 27.8%: Enterobacteria (70.4%), non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria (29.6%). Among the Enterobacteria the following stood outEsherichia coli (33.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.5%), Proteus mirabilis 11.1%, Citrobacter freundii (3.7%), Klebsiella oxytoca (3.7%). Among the NFHNB the following stood out Acinetobacter baumanni (14.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.1%), Pseudomonas putida (3.7%). Among the yeast-like fungi, Candida albicans was mainly isolated - 76.9%. Candida non-albicans was isolated to a less extent - 23.1%. Conclusions. According to the results of the conducted microbiological research, the etiological structure of purulent-inflammatory infections in victims of hostilities in Ukraine for 2022-2023 was studied. The spectrum of isolated pathogens consists of 72.2% gram-positive and 27.8% gram-negative bacteria. Yeast-like fungi of the genus Candida spp. Isolated from wounds in 11.8%. Conducted studies on the assessment of antimicrobial resistance of selected causative agents of wound infections. Installed high resistance of selected microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs of various chemical groups.","PeriodicalId":144023,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2024.01.050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate the etiological structure of purulent-inflammatory infections in injuries that occurred because of hostilities in Ukraine and to assess the antibiotic resistance of isolated pathogens. Materials and methods: Collection and transportation of samples of biological material from patients with injuries was carried out in accordance with the general principles of selection and transportation. Sowing, selection and identification of isolates was carried out by routine methods using the EUCAST methodology for determining the sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs by the disk diffusion method. Research results and their discussion: During the conduct of 154 microbiological studies of the wound contents of the wounded, 110 isolates were isolated and identified - 97 strains of opportunistic microorganisms and 13 strains of yeast-like fungi. At the same time, 68.2% of cultures were found in monoculture, and 31.8% in associations. To a greater extent, representatives of the gram-positive cocca flora were isolated from the wounded patients - 72.2%: Staphylococci (77.1%), Enterococci (14.3%), Streptococci (8.6%). Among the Staphylococci the following stood out Staphylococcus aureus (72.8%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (5.9%). Among Enterococci the following stood out Enterococcus faecalis (12.8%), Enterococcus faecium (1.4%). Among Streptococci, Streptococcus pyogenes stood out - 11.8%. To a less extent, gram-negative bacteria were released from the wounded patients - 27.8%: Enterobacteria (70.4%), non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria (29.6%). Among the Enterobacteria the following stood outEsherichia coli (33.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.5%), Proteus mirabilis 11.1%, Citrobacter freundii (3.7%), Klebsiella oxytoca (3.7%). Among the NFHNB the following stood out Acinetobacter baumanni (14.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.1%), Pseudomonas putida (3.7%). Among the yeast-like fungi, Candida albicans was mainly isolated - 76.9%. Candida non-albicans was isolated to a less extent - 23.1%. Conclusions. According to the results of the conducted microbiological research, the etiological structure of purulent-inflammatory infections in victims of hostilities in Ukraine for 2022-2023 was studied. The spectrum of isolated pathogens consists of 72.2% gram-positive and 27.8% gram-negative bacteria. Yeast-like fungi of the genus Candida spp. Isolated from wounds in 11.8%. Conducted studies on the assessment of antimicrobial resistance of selected causative agents of wound infections. Installed high resistance of selected microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs of various chemical groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作战受伤后化脓性炎症感染的病因以及病原体对抗菌制剂的敏感性
本研究的目的是调查乌克兰敌对行动造成的受伤人员化脓性炎症感染的病因结构,并评估分离出的病原体的抗生素耐药性。材料和方法受伤病人生物材料样本的采集和运输按照选择和运输的一般原则进行。分离物的播种、筛选和鉴定采用常规方法,使用欧盟CAST方法,通过磁盘扩散法测定微生物对抗菌药物的敏感性。研究结果及其讨论:在对伤员伤口内容物进行的 154 项微生物研究中,分离并鉴定出 110 株分离物--97 株机会性微生物和 13 株酵母样真菌。同时,68.2%的培养物为单培养物,31.8%为联合培养物。从伤病员体内分离出的革兰氏阳性球菌群占 72.2%:葡萄球菌(77.1%)、肠球菌(14.3%)、链球菌(8.6%)。在葡萄球菌中,金黄色葡萄球菌(72.8%)和溶血性葡萄球菌(5.9%)最为突出。在肠球菌中,主要有粪肠球菌(12.8%)、粪肠球菌(1.4%)。在链球菌中,化脓性链球菌占 11.8%。从伤员体内释放出的革兰氏阴性菌较少,占 27.8%:肠杆菌(70.4%)、非发酵革兰氏阴性菌(29.6%)。在肠杆菌中,以下细菌最为突出:大肠埃希菌(33.3%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(18.5%)、奇异变形杆菌(11.1%)、自由柠檬酸杆菌(3.7%)、氧乐菌(3.7%)。在 NFHNB 中,鲍曼不动杆菌(Acinetobacter baumanni)(14.8%)、铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)(11.1%)、腐生假单胞菌(Pseudomonas putida)(3.7%)最为突出。在酵母类真菌中,主要分离出白念珠菌(76.9%)。分离到的非白色念珠菌较少,仅占 23.1%。结论根据微生物学研究结果,对 2022-2023 年乌克兰敌对行动受害者化脓性炎症感染的病原体结构进行了研究。分离出的病原体包括 72.2%的革兰氏阳性菌和 27.8%的革兰氏阴性菌。从伤口中分离出的念珠菌属酵母样真菌占 11.8%。对选定的伤口感染致病菌的抗菌药耐药性进行评估研究。发现某些微生物对不同化学组的抗菌药物具有很强的抗药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Exposure to Metals during Pregnancy, Childhood Gut Microbiome, and Risk of Intestinal Inflammation in Late Childhood Balancing the Functionality and Biocompatibility of Materials with a Deep-Learning-Based Inverse Design Framework Moving beyond Wastewater: Perspectives on Environmental Surveillance of Infectious Diseases for Public Health Action in Low-Resource Settings Establishing a Multifaceted Comprehensive Maternity Cohort Facilitates Understanding of How Environmental Exposures Impact Perinatal Health Indoor Environment and Health Effects: Protocol of an Exploratory Panel Study among Young Adults in China (China IEHE Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1