Evaluating population-level outcomes in Chronic Lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel therapies using the SEER registry

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia research Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107496
Chandrasekar Muthiah , Ravi Narra , Ehab Atallah , Wanlin Juan , Aniko Szabo , Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy
{"title":"Evaluating population-level outcomes in Chronic Lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel therapies using the SEER registry","authors":"Chandrasekar Muthiah ,&nbsp;Ravi Narra ,&nbsp;Ehab Atallah ,&nbsp;Wanlin Juan ,&nbsp;Aniko Szabo ,&nbsp;Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy","doi":"10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last decade, novel agents such as BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors have revolutionized treatment of CLL/SLL, with clinical trials showing improved overall survival compared to chemotherapeutic agents. However, studies examining whether they have improved overall survival at the population level are lacking. We evaluated this by conducting a retrospective analysis of CLL/SLL patients registered in the National Cancer Institute’s surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database, analyzing overall survival (OS) in periods pre- and post-availability of novel agents, along with demographic information. Our results showed that median OS significantly improved over time [7.8 years (2000–2005), 9.1 years (2006–2013), and not reached (2014–2018) (p &lt; 0.001)]. Compared to diagnosis in 2014–2018, diagnosis in earlier periods was associated with higher mortality risk (2000–2005-HR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.28–1.37, p &lt; 0.001: 2006–2013-HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.06–1.13, p &lt; 0.001). Lower mortality risk was seen in patients age &lt; 85 years whereas median household income of &lt;$75000 was associated with higher mortality. Our study provides real-world data suggesting a possible multifactorial contribution to improvement in survival, including availability of novel agents, better monitoring, and supportive care. They also show discrepancies in overall survival for CLL/SLL patients due to socioeconomic status and demographic factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18051,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145212624000626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decade, novel agents such as BTK and BCL-2 inhibitors have revolutionized treatment of CLL/SLL, with clinical trials showing improved overall survival compared to chemotherapeutic agents. However, studies examining whether they have improved overall survival at the population level are lacking. We evaluated this by conducting a retrospective analysis of CLL/SLL patients registered in the National Cancer Institute’s surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database, analyzing overall survival (OS) in periods pre- and post-availability of novel agents, along with demographic information. Our results showed that median OS significantly improved over time [7.8 years (2000–2005), 9.1 years (2006–2013), and not reached (2014–2018) (p < 0.001)]. Compared to diagnosis in 2014–2018, diagnosis in earlier periods was associated with higher mortality risk (2000–2005-HR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.28–1.37, p < 0.001: 2006–2013-HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.06–1.13, p < 0.001). Lower mortality risk was seen in patients age < 85 years whereas median household income of <$75000 was associated with higher mortality. Our study provides real-world data suggesting a possible multifactorial contribution to improvement in survival, including availability of novel agents, better monitoring, and supportive care. They also show discrepancies in overall survival for CLL/SLL patients due to socioeconomic status and demographic factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 SEER 登记册评估新型疗法时代慢性淋巴细胞白血病的人群水平结果
在过去十年中,BTK 和 BCL-2 抑制剂等新型药物彻底改变了 CLL/SLL 的治疗方法,临床试验显示,与化疗药物相比,这些药物可提高总生存率。然而,目前还缺乏对这些药物是否改善了人群总生存率的研究。我们对美国国家癌症研究所监测流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中登记的 CLL/SLL 患者进行了回顾性分析,分析了新型药物上市前后的总生存期(OS)以及人口统计学信息,从而对此进行了评估。我们的结果显示,中位OS随着时间的推移明显改善[7.8年(2000-2005年)、9.1年(2006-2013年)、未达到(2014-2018年)(p <0.001)]。与2014-2018年的诊断相比,早期诊断与较高的死亡风险相关(2000-2005年-HR 1.32,95 % CI 1.28-1.37,p <0.001:2006-2013年-HR 1.09,95 % CI 1.06-1.13,p <0.001)。85岁的患者死亡率较低,而家庭收入中位数为75000美元的患者死亡率较高。我们的研究提供了真实世界的数据,表明生存率的提高可能是多因素促成的,包括新型药物的可用性、更好的监测和支持性护理。这些数据还显示,由于社会经济状况和人口因素的影响,CLL/SLL 患者的总生存率存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia research
Leukemia research 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia Research an international journal which brings comprehensive and current information to all health care professionals involved in basic and applied clinical research in hematological malignancies. The editors encourage the submission of articles relevant to hematological malignancies. The Journal scope includes reporting studies of cellular and molecular biology, genetics, immunology, epidemiology, clinical evaluation, and therapy of these diseases.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of steroid-refractory acute/chronic graft versus host disease: A single-center real-world experience of ruxolitinib in combination with extracorporeal photopheresis in a high-risk population Epidemiological and genetic insights into the co-occurrence of cutaneous melanoma and hematologic malignancies: A meta-analytic review In vitro testing of drug response in primary multiple myeloma cells using a microwell-based technology Editorial Board The effect of body mass index on the safety of bosutinib in patients with chronic leukemia: A post hoc pooled data analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1