Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

{"title":"Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intraoperative physiologic parameters could offer predictive utility in evaluating risk of adverse postoperative events yet are not included in current standard risk models. This study examined whether the inclusion of continuous intraoperative data improved machine learning model predictions for multiple outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, including 30-day mortality, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, and combined morbidity and mortality (MM).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database features and risk scores were combined with retrospectively gathered continuous intraoperative data from patients. Risk models were developed for each outcome by training a logistic regression classifier on intraoperative data using 5-fold cross-validation. STS risk scores were included as offset terms in the models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with the STS Risk Calculator, models developed using a combination of the intraoperative features and the STS preoperative risk score had improved mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prolonged ventilation (0.750 [95% CI, 0.690-0.809] vs 0.800 [95% CI, 0.750-0.851]) and MM (0.695 [95% CI, 0.644-0.746] vs 0.724 [95% CI, 0.673-0.775]). Additionally, models developed using intraoperative features had improved calibration, measured with Brier score, for prolonged ventilation (0.060 [95% CI, 0.050-0.070] vs 0.055 [95% CI, 0.045-0.065]) and MM (0.092 [95% CI, 0.081-0.103] vs 0.087 [95% CI, 0.075-0.098]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The inclusion of time series intraoperative data in risk models may improve early postoperative care by identifying patients who require closer monitoring postoperatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001086/pdfft?md5=158e2f3daf8625394c6982ec2038b914&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001086-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative physiologic parameters could offer predictive utility in evaluating risk of adverse postoperative events yet are not included in current standard risk models. This study examined whether the inclusion of continuous intraoperative data improved machine learning model predictions for multiple outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, including 30-day mortality, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, and combined morbidity and mortality (MM).

Methods

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database features and risk scores were combined with retrospectively gathered continuous intraoperative data from patients. Risk models were developed for each outcome by training a logistic regression classifier on intraoperative data using 5-fold cross-validation. STS risk scores were included as offset terms in the models.

Results

Compared with the STS Risk Calculator, models developed using a combination of the intraoperative features and the STS preoperative risk score had improved mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prolonged ventilation (0.750 [95% CI, 0.690-0.809] vs 0.800 [95% CI, 0.750-0.851]) and MM (0.695 [95% CI, 0.644-0.746] vs 0.724 [95% CI, 0.673-0.775]). Additionally, models developed using intraoperative features had improved calibration, measured with Brier score, for prolonged ventilation (0.060 [95% CI, 0.050-0.070] vs 0.055 [95% CI, 0.045-0.065]) and MM (0.092 [95% CI, 0.081-0.103] vs 0.087 [95% CI, 0.075-0.098]).

Conclusions

The inclusion of time series intraoperative data in risk models may improve early postoperative care by identifying patients who require closer monitoring postoperatively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中特征提高了冠状动脉旁路移植术后的模型风险预测能力
背景术中生理参数可为评估术后不良事件的风险提供预测作用,但目前的标准风险模型中并未包括这些参数。本研究考察了纳入术中连续数据是否能改善机器学习模型对冠状动脉旁路移植术后多种结果的预测,包括 30 天死亡率、肾衰竭、再次手术、通气时间延长以及发病率和死亡率(MM)的综合预测。方法将胸外科医师学会(STS)数据库特征和风险评分与回顾性收集的患者术中连续数据相结合。通过对术中数据进行 5 倍交叉验证,训练逻辑回归分类器,为每种结果建立风险模型。结果与 STS 风险计算器相比,结合术中特征和 STS 术前风险评分建立的模型在延长通气时间方面的接收者操作特征曲线下的平均面积有所改善(0.750 [95% CI, 0.690-0.809] vs 0.800 [95% CI, 0.750-0.851])和 MM(0.695 [95% CI, 0.644-0.746] vs 0.724 [95% CI, 0.673-0.775])的接收者操作特征曲线下的平均面积有所改善。此外,使用术中特征开发的模型在长时间通气(0.060 [95% CI, 0.050-0.070] vs 0.055 [95% CI, 0.045-0.065])和 MM(0.092 [95% CI, 0.结论将术中时间序列数据纳入风险模型可识别出术后需要更密切监测的患者,从而改善术后早期护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey Pulmonary Artery Vasa Vasorum Damage in Severe COVID-19–Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Single-Stage Surgical Approach to Aortoesophageal Fistula After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1