An Evaluation of Tropical Cyclone Genesis Forecast over the Western North Pacific and the South China Sea from the CMA-TRAMS

Mengjie Li, Zi-tong Chen, Guang-feng Dai, Qun Tian, Jeremy Cheuk-hin Leung, Qing Lin, Yan-xia Zhang
{"title":"An Evaluation of Tropical Cyclone Genesis Forecast over the Western North Pacific and the South China Sea from the CMA-TRAMS","authors":"Mengjie Li, Zi-tong Chen, Guang-feng Dai, Qun Tian, Jeremy Cheuk-hin Leung, Qing Lin, Yan-xia Zhang","doi":"10.3724/j.1006-8775.2024.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Tropical cyclone (TC) genesis forecasting is essential for daily operational practices during the typhoon season. The updated version of the Tropical Regional Atmosphere Model for the South China Sea (CMA-TRAMS) offers forecasters reliable numerical weather prediction (NWP) products with improved configurations and fine resolution. While traditional evaluation of typhoon forecasts has focused on track and intensity, the increasing accuracy of TC genesis forecasts calls for more comprehensive evaluation methods to assess the reliability of these predictions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the CMA-TRAMS for cyclogenesis forecasts over the western North Pacific and South China Sea. Based on previous research and typhoon observation data over five years, a set of localized, objective criteria has been proposed. The analysis results indicate that the CMA-TRAMS demonstrated superiority in cyclogenesis forecasts, predicting 6 out of 22 TCs with a forecast lead time of up to 144 h. Additionally, over 80% of the total could be predicted 72 h in advance. The model also showed an average TC genesis position error of 218.3 km, comparable to the track errors of operational models according to the annual evaluation. The study also briefly investigated the forecast of Noul (2011). The forecast field of the CMA-TRAMS depicted thermal and dynamical conditions that could trigger typhoon genesis, consistent with the analysis field. The 96-hour forecast field of the CMA-TRAMS displayed a relatively organized three-dimensional structure of the typhoon. These results can enhance understanding of the mechanism behind typhoon genesis, fine-tune model configurations and dynamical frameworks, and provide reliable forecasts for forecasters.","PeriodicalId":508291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Meteorology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/j.1006-8775.2024.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Tropical cyclone (TC) genesis forecasting is essential for daily operational practices during the typhoon season. The updated version of the Tropical Regional Atmosphere Model for the South China Sea (CMA-TRAMS) offers forecasters reliable numerical weather prediction (NWP) products with improved configurations and fine resolution. While traditional evaluation of typhoon forecasts has focused on track and intensity, the increasing accuracy of TC genesis forecasts calls for more comprehensive evaluation methods to assess the reliability of these predictions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the CMA-TRAMS for cyclogenesis forecasts over the western North Pacific and South China Sea. Based on previous research and typhoon observation data over five years, a set of localized, objective criteria has been proposed. The analysis results indicate that the CMA-TRAMS demonstrated superiority in cyclogenesis forecasts, predicting 6 out of 22 TCs with a forecast lead time of up to 144 h. Additionally, over 80% of the total could be predicted 72 h in advance. The model also showed an average TC genesis position error of 218.3 km, comparable to the track errors of operational models according to the annual evaluation. The study also briefly investigated the forecast of Noul (2011). The forecast field of the CMA-TRAMS depicted thermal and dynamical conditions that could trigger typhoon genesis, consistent with the analysis field. The 96-hour forecast field of the CMA-TRAMS displayed a relatively organized three-dimensional structure of the typhoon. These results can enhance understanding of the mechanism behind typhoon genesis, fine-tune model configurations and dynamical frameworks, and provide reliable forecasts for forecasters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 CMA-TRAMS 预测的北太平洋西部和南海热带气旋成因的评估
:热带气旋(TC)成因预报对于台风季节的日常业务实践至关重要。中国南海热带区域大气模式(CMA-TRAMS)的更新版本为预报员提供了可靠的数值天气预报(NWP)产品,其配置和分辨率均有所改进。传统的台风预报评估主要集中在路径和强度方面,而随着热带气旋成因预报精度的不断提高,需要采用更全面的评估方法来评估这些预报的可靠性。本研究旨在评估 CMA-TRAMS 对北太平洋西部和中国南海气旋生成预报的有效性。根据以往的研究和五年来的台风观测数据,提出了一套本地化的客观标准。分析结果表明,CMA-TRAMS 在气旋生成预报方面表现优异,在 22 个热带气旋中预测到了 6 个,预报准备时间长达 144 小时。根据年度评估,该模式还显示出平均 218.3 千米的热带气旋起源位置误差,与业务模式的路径误差相当。研究还对 Noul(2011 年)的预报进行了简要调查。CMA-TRAMS 的预报场描述了可能引发台风生成的热力和动力条件,与分析场一致。CMA-TRAMS 的 96 小时预报场显示了台风相对有序的三维结构。这些结果可加深对台风生成机制的理解,对模式配置和动力学框架进行微调,并为预报员提供可靠的预报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization and Application of S-Band Polarimetric Radar and X-Band Phased Array Radar for a Tornadic Storm Event on June 16, 2022 Effect of the Initial Vortex Structure on Intensity Change During Eyewall Replacement Cycle of Tropical Cyclones: A Numerical Study Comparative Analysis of Energy Characteristics of Two Southwest Vortices in Sichuan Under Similar Circulation Backgrounds Growth and Interactions of Multi-Source Perturbations in Convection-Allowing Ensemble Forecasts Analysis of Summer Cold Vortex Activity Anomalies in Northeastern China and Their Relationship with Regional Precipitation and Temperature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1