Natalia Shcherbakova , Shane Desselle , Carole Bandiera , Joanne Canedo , Anandi V. Law , Parisa Aslani
{"title":"Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles","authors":"Natalia Shcherbakova , Shane Desselle , Carole Bandiera , Joanne Canedo , Anandi V. Law , Parisa Aslani","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy has been expanding in the last decade. The recently published Granada Statements offer key recommendations to improve the quality of research in this field.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To identify the factors associated with the citations of articles in the field of social, administrative, clinical pharmacy and practice research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective, observational analysis of articles published in three leading journals. Per article Google Scholar citations was the dependent variable. Predictor variables were extracted from all articles published from 2013 to 2015. The dependent variable was dichotomized using sample's median Google Scholar citations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of citations ≥ median.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median number of citations per article was 17 (range 0–341), with a mean of 24.2 (SD 27.6). The number of references included in the articles (OR 1.03, CI 1.02–1.04), the year of publication (OR 0.31 CI 0.21–0.46 for articles published 2015), article social media mentions (OR = 1.01, CI 1.01–1.03 and OR 1.10 CI 1.04–1.18 for Facebook and X, respectively), the topic area of research namely pharmacy services (OR 1.65, CI 1.06–2.57) and medication adherence (OR 2.22 CI 1.13–4.33) were independently associated with article having citations ≥ median.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The number of references, the year of publication, social media mentions and the topic area of research, namely pharmacy services and medication adherence, were associated with citations above median in the leading journals of social and administrative pharmacy research. Authors may consider providing a thorough literature review in their articles, while researchers, editors, and publishers are advised to use social media to promote newly published work. This article complements the Granada Statements and may contribute to fostering wider dissemination of the discipline's outputs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124000901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy has been expanding in the last decade. The recently published Granada Statements offer key recommendations to improve the quality of research in this field.
Objectives
To identify the factors associated with the citations of articles in the field of social, administrative, clinical pharmacy and practice research.
Methods
This study was a retrospective, observational analysis of articles published in three leading journals. Per article Google Scholar citations was the dependent variable. Predictor variables were extracted from all articles published from 2013 to 2015. The dependent variable was dichotomized using sample's median Google Scholar citations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of citations ≥ median.
Results
The median number of citations per article was 17 (range 0–341), with a mean of 24.2 (SD 27.6). The number of references included in the articles (OR 1.03, CI 1.02–1.04), the year of publication (OR 0.31 CI 0.21–0.46 for articles published 2015), article social media mentions (OR = 1.01, CI 1.01–1.03 and OR 1.10 CI 1.04–1.18 for Facebook and X, respectively), the topic area of research namely pharmacy services (OR 1.65, CI 1.06–2.57) and medication adherence (OR 2.22 CI 1.13–4.33) were independently associated with article having citations ≥ median.
Conclusions
The number of references, the year of publication, social media mentions and the topic area of research, namely pharmacy services and medication adherence, were associated with citations above median in the leading journals of social and administrative pharmacy research. Authors may consider providing a thorough literature review in their articles, while researchers, editors, and publishers are advised to use social media to promote newly published work. This article complements the Granada Statements and may contribute to fostering wider dissemination of the discipline's outputs.
期刊介绍：
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
