Sarah A. Mathena , Vanessa F. Eller , Scott E. Klewer , Jennifer G. Andrews
{"title":"Executive function and maladaptive coping in a young adult cohort of individuals with congenital heart disease","authors":"Sarah A. Mathena , Vanessa F. Eller , Scott E. Klewer , Jennifer G. Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.ppedcard.2024.101723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are more likely to exhibit executive dysfunction and maladaptive coping yet are less likely to get diagnosed than the general population for psychiatric disorders. The etiology of psychiatric diagnosis is inconclusive amongst CHD populations, and more research is needed to evaluate risk factors contributing to psychiatric disorders, including executive function, coping mechanisms, anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disorders, parental style/involvement, and sense of coherence.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study proposed to demonstrate the presence of risk for psychiatric diagnoses amongst young adults with CHD and evaluate factors contributing to mental health and executive dysfunction comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a mixed methods study of quantitative scales and a guided interview on a cohort of 11 young adults (18–24) with CHD who are considered in the American Heart Association high-risk group for developmental disorders or disabilities. We assessed for risk of anxiety and depression, maladaptive and disengagement coping, executive dysfunction, and other factors associated with mental health using the Reponses to Stress (RSQ), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory (AEFI) scales. Qualitative interviews focused on experiences living with CHD, social and family support, and executive functioning skills.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our mean participant age was 20 years, and 36 % had some college education. PROMIS scoring showed increased risk for poor physical function (mean <em>r</em> = 31.8), anxiety (mean <em>r</em> = 64.9), depression (mean <em>r</em> = 66.8), and pain interference (mean <em>r</em> = 66.6). AEFI results also showed poor executive functioning skills, particularly in Self-Control/Self-Monitoring (mean 18.1) and Planning and Initiative (mean 5.3). 27 % of participants had medical record documentation of depression. Interviews showed participants overinflated sense of coherence and poor executive functioning, leading to two main themes: 1) perceptions of their disability, including denial of their CHD diagnosis and disengagement with mental health needs, and 2) challenges in transition care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study indicates a need for larger scale interventions for psychological young adults with CHD as part of the transition process to adult care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46028,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058981324000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are more likely to exhibit executive dysfunction and maladaptive coping yet are less likely to get diagnosed than the general population for psychiatric disorders. The etiology of psychiatric diagnosis is inconclusive amongst CHD populations, and more research is needed to evaluate risk factors contributing to psychiatric disorders, including executive function, coping mechanisms, anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disorders, parental style/involvement, and sense of coherence.
Objectives
The study proposed to demonstrate the presence of risk for psychiatric diagnoses amongst young adults with CHD and evaluate factors contributing to mental health and executive dysfunction comorbidities.
Methods
We used a mixed methods study of quantitative scales and a guided interview on a cohort of 11 young adults (18–24) with CHD who are considered in the American Heart Association high-risk group for developmental disorders or disabilities. We assessed for risk of anxiety and depression, maladaptive and disengagement coping, executive dysfunction, and other factors associated with mental health using the Reponses to Stress (RSQ), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory (AEFI) scales. Qualitative interviews focused on experiences living with CHD, social and family support, and executive functioning skills.
Results
Our mean participant age was 20 years, and 36 % had some college education. PROMIS scoring showed increased risk for poor physical function (mean r = 31.8), anxiety (mean r = 64.9), depression (mean r = 66.8), and pain interference (mean r = 66.6). AEFI results also showed poor executive functioning skills, particularly in Self-Control/Self-Monitoring (mean 18.1) and Planning and Initiative (mean 5.3). 27 % of participants had medical record documentation of depression. Interviews showed participants overinflated sense of coherence and poor executive functioning, leading to two main themes: 1) perceptions of their disability, including denial of their CHD diagnosis and disengagement with mental health needs, and 2) challenges in transition care.
Conclusions
Our study indicates a need for larger scale interventions for psychological young adults with CHD as part of the transition process to adult care.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Pediatric Cardiology is an international journal of review presenting information and experienced opinion of importance in the understanding and management of cardiovascular diseases in children. Each issue is prepared by one or more Guest Editors and reviews a single subject, allowing for comprehensive presentations of complex, multifaceted or rapidly changing topics of clinical and investigative interest.