Executive function and maladaptive coping in a young adult cohort of individuals with congenital heart disease

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ppedcard.2024.101723
Sarah A. Mathena , Vanessa F. Eller , Scott E. Klewer , Jennifer G. Andrews
{"title":"Executive function and maladaptive coping in a young adult cohort of individuals with congenital heart disease","authors":"Sarah A. Mathena ,&nbsp;Vanessa F. Eller ,&nbsp;Scott E. Klewer ,&nbsp;Jennifer G. Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.ppedcard.2024.101723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are more likely to exhibit executive dysfunction and maladaptive coping yet are less likely to get diagnosed than the general population for psychiatric disorders. The etiology of psychiatric diagnosis is inconclusive amongst CHD populations, and more research is needed to evaluate risk factors contributing to psychiatric disorders, including executive function, coping mechanisms, anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disorders, parental style/involvement, and sense of coherence.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study proposed to demonstrate the presence of risk for psychiatric diagnoses amongst young adults with CHD and evaluate factors contributing to mental health and executive dysfunction comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a mixed methods study of quantitative scales and a guided interview on a cohort of 11 young adults (18–24) with CHD who are considered in the American Heart Association high-risk group for developmental disorders or disabilities. We assessed for risk of anxiety and depression, maladaptive and disengagement coping, executive dysfunction, and other factors associated with mental health using the Reponses to Stress (RSQ), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory (AEFI) scales. Qualitative interviews focused on experiences living with CHD, social and family support, and executive functioning skills.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our mean participant age was 20 years, and 36 % had some college education. PROMIS scoring showed increased risk for poor physical function (mean <em>r</em> = 31.8), anxiety (mean <em>r</em> = 64.9), depression (mean <em>r</em> = 66.8), and pain interference (mean <em>r</em> = 66.6). AEFI results also showed poor executive functioning skills, particularly in Self-Control/Self-Monitoring (mean 18.1) and Planning and Initiative (mean 5.3). 27 % of participants had medical record documentation of depression. Interviews showed participants overinflated sense of coherence and poor executive functioning, leading to two main themes: 1) perceptions of their disability, including denial of their CHD diagnosis and disengagement with mental health needs, and 2) challenges in transition care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study indicates a need for larger scale interventions for psychological young adults with CHD as part of the transition process to adult care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46028,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058981324000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are more likely to exhibit executive dysfunction and maladaptive coping yet are less likely to get diagnosed than the general population for psychiatric disorders. The etiology of psychiatric diagnosis is inconclusive amongst CHD populations, and more research is needed to evaluate risk factors contributing to psychiatric disorders, including executive function, coping mechanisms, anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disorders, parental style/involvement, and sense of coherence.

Objectives

The study proposed to demonstrate the presence of risk for psychiatric diagnoses amongst young adults with CHD and evaluate factors contributing to mental health and executive dysfunction comorbidities.

Methods

We used a mixed methods study of quantitative scales and a guided interview on a cohort of 11 young adults (18–24) with CHD who are considered in the American Heart Association high-risk group for developmental disorders or disabilities. We assessed for risk of anxiety and depression, maladaptive and disengagement coping, executive dysfunction, and other factors associated with mental health using the Reponses to Stress (RSQ), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory (AEFI) scales. Qualitative interviews focused on experiences living with CHD, social and family support, and executive functioning skills.

Results

Our mean participant age was 20 years, and 36 % had some college education. PROMIS scoring showed increased risk for poor physical function (mean r = 31.8), anxiety (mean r = 64.9), depression (mean r = 66.8), and pain interference (mean r = 66.6). AEFI results also showed poor executive functioning skills, particularly in Self-Control/Self-Monitoring (mean 18.1) and Planning and Initiative (mean 5.3). 27 % of participants had medical record documentation of depression. Interviews showed participants overinflated sense of coherence and poor executive functioning, leading to two main themes: 1) perceptions of their disability, including denial of their CHD diagnosis and disengagement with mental health needs, and 2) challenges in transition care.

Conclusions

Our study indicates a need for larger scale interventions for psychological young adults with CHD as part of the transition process to adult care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有先天性心脏病的年轻成人群体的执行功能和适应不良的应对方式
背景患有先天性心脏病(CHD)的年轻成年人更有可能表现出执行功能障碍和不适应性应对,但与普通人群相比,他们被诊断出精神障碍的可能性较低。在先天性心脏病人群中,精神病诊断的病因尚无定论,需要进行更多的研究来评估导致精神障碍的风险因素,包括执行功能、应对机制、焦虑、抑郁、疲劳和睡眠障碍、父母的风格/参与以及连贯感。本研究旨在证明患有先天性心脏病的年轻成年人中存在精神疾病诊断的风险,并评估导致精神健康和执行功能障碍合并症的因素。方法我们采用了定量量表和引导式访谈的混合方法,研究对象是11名患有先天性心脏病的年轻成年人(18-24岁),他们被认为是美国心脏协会发育障碍或残疾高危人群。我们使用压力反应量表 (RSQ)、患者报告结果测量信息系统 (PROMIS) 和阿姆斯特丹执行功能量表 (AEFI) 对焦虑和抑郁风险、适应不良和脱离应对、执行功能障碍以及其他与心理健康相关的因素进行了评估。定性访谈的重点是慢性阻塞性肺病患者的生活经历、社会和家庭支持以及执行功能技能。PROMIS 评分显示,身体功能差(平均 r = 31.8)、焦虑(平均 r = 64.9)、抑郁(平均 r = 66.8)和疼痛干扰(平均 r = 66.6)的风险增加。AEFI 结果还显示执行功能技能较差,尤其是在自我控制/自我监控(平均值为 18.1)和计划与主动性(平均值为 5.3)方面。27% 的参与者有抑郁症的医疗记录。访谈显示,参与者过度膨胀的一致性意识和较差的执行功能导致了两大主题:1)对其残疾的看法,包括否认其患有先天性心脏病的诊断和脱离心理健康需求,以及 2)在过渡护理中面临的挑战。结论我们的研究表明,需要对患有先天性心脏病的年轻成人进行更大规模的心理干预,作为向成人护理过渡过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Pediatric Cardiology is an international journal of review presenting information and experienced opinion of importance in the understanding and management of cardiovascular diseases in children. Each issue is prepared by one or more Guest Editors and reviews a single subject, allowing for comprehensive presentations of complex, multifaceted or rapidly changing topics of clinical and investigative interest.
期刊最新文献
It is a fine line with flecainide: A case of flecainide toxicity in a pediatric patient Clinical insights: Resolving the specter of cardiac sequelae in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) – A 24-month follow-up case series Decreased ventricular repolarization variability in one-year-olds of gestational diabetes mothers Guideline-directed medical therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy in the era of pediatric ventricular assist devices: Improving transplant-free survival Health related quality of life in children following Fontan surgery: A Malaysian perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1