Towards global elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a systematic review of the application of spatial epidemiological methods to enhance surveillance and support elimination programmes

B. M. Martin, A. C. Cadavid Restrepo, H. Mayfield, Colleen L. Lau
{"title":"Towards global elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a systematic review of the application of spatial epidemiological methods to enhance surveillance and support elimination programmes","authors":"B. M. Martin, A. C. Cadavid Restrepo, H. Mayfield, Colleen L. Lau","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, spatial epidemiology has increasingly been used to study neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Spatial methods are particularly relevant when transmission is strongly driven by sociodemographic and environmental factors, resulting in heterogeneous disease distribution. We use lymphatic filariasis (LF)—an NTD targeted for global elimination—as a case study to examine how spatial epidemiology has been used to enhance NTD surveillance.We conducted a systematic literature review of spatial analytical studies of LF published in English across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases, before 15 November 2022. Additional papers were identified from experts’ suggestions. Studies that employed spatial analytical methods were included, but those that applied only visualisation tools were excluded.Sixty-one eligible studies published between 1997 and 2023 were identified. The studies used a wide range of spatial methods. Thirty-one (50.8%) studies used spatial statistical modelling, with model-based geostatistics being the most common method. Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis were applied in 30 studies (49.2%). The most frequent model outputs were prevalence maps (17 studies, 27.9%), followed by risk maps based on environmental suitability (7 studies, 11.5%) and maps of the odds of seroprevalence being above a predetermined threshold (7 studies, 11.5%).By demonstrating the applicability of spatial methods for investigating transmission drivers, identifying clusters and predicting hotspots, we highlight innovative ways in which spatial epidemiology has provided valuable evidence to support LF elimination. Spatial analysis is particularly useful in low-prevalence settings for improving hotspot detection and enhancing postelimination surveillance.CRD42022333804.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, spatial epidemiology has increasingly been used to study neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Spatial methods are particularly relevant when transmission is strongly driven by sociodemographic and environmental factors, resulting in heterogeneous disease distribution. We use lymphatic filariasis (LF)—an NTD targeted for global elimination—as a case study to examine how spatial epidemiology has been used to enhance NTD surveillance.We conducted a systematic literature review of spatial analytical studies of LF published in English across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases, before 15 November 2022. Additional papers were identified from experts’ suggestions. Studies that employed spatial analytical methods were included, but those that applied only visualisation tools were excluded.Sixty-one eligible studies published between 1997 and 2023 were identified. The studies used a wide range of spatial methods. Thirty-one (50.8%) studies used spatial statistical modelling, with model-based geostatistics being the most common method. Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis were applied in 30 studies (49.2%). The most frequent model outputs were prevalence maps (17 studies, 27.9%), followed by risk maps based on environmental suitability (7 studies, 11.5%) and maps of the odds of seroprevalence being above a predetermined threshold (7 studies, 11.5%).By demonstrating the applicability of spatial methods for investigating transmission drivers, identifying clusters and predicting hotspots, we highlight innovative ways in which spatial epidemiology has provided valuable evidence to support LF elimination. Spatial analysis is particularly useful in low-prevalence settings for improving hotspot detection and enhancing postelimination surveillance.CRD42022333804.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
努力在全球消除淋巴丝虫病:对应用空间流行病学方法加强监测和支持消除计划的系统审查
近几十年来,空间流行病学越来越多地被用于研究被忽视的热带疾病(NTDs)。当传播受社会人口和环境因素的强烈影响,导致疾病分布不均时,空间方法就显得尤为重要。我们以淋巴丝虫病(LF)--一种目标是在全球范围内消灭的 NTD--为案例,研究了空间流行病学如何被用于加强 NTD 监测。此外,还根据专家建议确定了其他论文。采用空间分析方法的研究被纳入其中,但仅采用可视化工具的研究被排除在外。这些研究使用了多种空间方法。有 31 项(50.8%)研究使用了空间统计建模,其中基于模型的地理统计是最常用的方法。有 30 项研究(49.2%)采用了空间自相关和热点分析。最常见的模型输出是流行率地图(17 项研究,占 27.9%),其次是基于环境适宜性的风险地图(7 项研究,占 11.5%)和血清流行率超过预定阈值的几率地图(7 项研究,占 11.5%)。通过展示空间方法在调查传播驱动因素、识别群集和预测热点方面的适用性,我们强调了空间流行病学为支持消除地方淋巴瘤提供宝贵证据的创新方法。在低流行率环境中,空间分析对改善热点检测和加强消除后监测尤为有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial health stigma related to COVID-19 disease among COVID-19 patients in Jordan: a comparative study Evaluating and mapping the evidence that screening for diabetic foot disease meets the criteria for population-wide screening: a scoping review Effectiveness of direct patient outreach with a narrative naloxone and overdose prevention video to patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy in the USA: the Naloxone Navigator randomised clinical trial Social media use and anxiety levels among school adolescents: a cross-sectional study in Kathmandu, Nepal Community childhood obesity assessment in elementary school, anthropometric indices as screening tools: a community cross-sectional study in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1