Non-operating room anesthesia workflow (NORA) implementation to improve start times in interventional radiology

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.03.009
Justin S. Routman , Benjamin K. Tran , Brooke R. Vining , Aliaksei Salei , Andrew J. Gunn , Junaid Raja , Junjian Huang
{"title":"Non-operating room anesthesia workflow (NORA) implementation to improve start times in interventional radiology","authors":"Justin S. Routman ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Tran ,&nbsp;Brooke R. Vining ,&nbsp;Aliaksei Salei ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Gunn ,&nbsp;Junaid Raja ,&nbsp;Junjian Huang","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) is rapidly becoming standard in many high-volume institutions and efficiency in these spaces has yet to be optimized. On-time first start percentage has been suggested to correlate with more efficient flow, and this correlation is established within the surgical space.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the effects of timetable targets on first case on-time first start percentage within a NORA setting.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study of anesthesia-supported first start cases from October 2022 to April 2023 was performed to analyze the effect of timetable targets on on-time first-case starts for planned cases. Statistical analysis was calculated using Student's t-tests with statistical significance defined as p &lt; 0.05. Additionally, analysis of variance was used to compare three or more groups, and Tukey Kramer was used to evaluate groups pairwise.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred twenty-four first start cases were included in the evaluation. After intervention with timetable targets, average patient arrival to the room time improved from 7:49 AM to 7:40 AM (p &lt; 0.05) and procedure start time improved from 8:31 AM to 8:20 AM (p &lt; 0.01). The percentage of procedure start times occurring prior to the goal time increased from 35 % to 58 % after the implementation (p &lt; 0.05). With exception of Tuesdays (Anesthesia Late Start Day), on-time starts improved from 17 % to 48 % (p &lt; 0.01) and sustained this improvement throughout the post-implementation period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Implementation of novel timetable targets yielded statistically significant improvement in first case start times. This improvement in efficiency and throughput results in increased room utilization, improved case throughput, and decreased block overrun times, all of which contribute toward increased revenues, decreased costs, and thus improved return on investment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 477-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) is rapidly becoming standard in many high-volume institutions and efficiency in these spaces has yet to be optimized. On-time first start percentage has been suggested to correlate with more efficient flow, and this correlation is established within the surgical space.

Purpose

To investigate the effects of timetable targets on first case on-time first start percentage within a NORA setting.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study of anesthesia-supported first start cases from October 2022 to April 2023 was performed to analyze the effect of timetable targets on on-time first-case starts for planned cases. Statistical analysis was calculated using Student's t-tests with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Additionally, analysis of variance was used to compare three or more groups, and Tukey Kramer was used to evaluate groups pairwise.

Results

One hundred twenty-four first start cases were included in the evaluation. After intervention with timetable targets, average patient arrival to the room time improved from 7:49 AM to 7:40 AM (p < 0.05) and procedure start time improved from 8:31 AM to 8:20 AM (p < 0.01). The percentage of procedure start times occurring prior to the goal time increased from 35 % to 58 % after the implementation (p < 0.05). With exception of Tuesdays (Anesthesia Late Start Day), on-time starts improved from 17 % to 48 % (p < 0.01) and sustained this improvement throughout the post-implementation period.

Conclusion

Implementation of novel timetable targets yielded statistically significant improvement in first case start times. This improvement in efficiency and throughput results in increased room utilization, improved case throughput, and decreased block overrun times, all of which contribute toward increased revenues, decreased costs, and thus improved return on investment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施非手术室麻醉工作流程 (NORA),改善介入放射学的开始时间
背景非手术麻醉(NORA)正在迅速成为许多高流量机构的标准,但这些机构的效率仍有待优化。材料和方法对 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 4 月麻醉支持的首次启动病例进行了回顾性研究,以分析时间表目标对计划病例首次按时启动的影响。统计分析采用学生 t 检验,统计学显著性定义为 p < 0.05。此外,方差分析用于比较三个或三个以上的组别,Tukey Kramer 用于对组别进行配对评价。使用时间表目标进行干预后,患者到达病房的平均时间从早上 7:49 改善到 7:40(p <0.05),手术开始时间从早上 8:31 改善到 8:20(p <0.01)。实施后,手术开始时间早于目标时间的比例从 35% 增加到 58%(p <0.05)。除周二(麻醉延迟开始日)外,手术准时开始的比例从 17% 提高到 48%(p <0.01),并在实施后的整个期间保持了这一提高。效率和吞吐量的改善提高了病房利用率,提高了病例吞吐量,减少了区块超时时间,所有这些都有助于增加收入、降低成本,从而提高投资回报率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Corrigendum to “Original Article: The history of Women in Radiology (WIR) programs at two academic institutions: How we did it and how we merged best practices” [Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 54 (2025) 35-39] A stroke imaging protocol in patients with a history of contrast-induced anaphylaxis Arachnoid granulations: Dynamic nature and review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1