Comparison of Refractive Prediction Error by Axial Length in Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.2147/opth.s455178
Yoshiaki Kabata, Tetsutaro Oki, Tadashi Nakano
{"title":"Comparison of Refractive Prediction Error by Axial Length in Flanged Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation","authors":"Yoshiaki Kabata, Tetsutaro Oki, Tadashi Nakano","doi":"10.2147/opth.s455178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the refractive prediction error in flanged intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation using the SRK/T formula and compare the axial length using a single IOL. Methods: Seventy-six eyes from 70 patients (45 males and 25 females) were included in this study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 73.4 ±12.3 years. The patients underwent flanged IOL fixation using a PN6A (Kowa). All surgeries were performed by two surgeons (Y. K. and T. O.) between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022 at Jikei University Daisan Hospital. IOL power was calculated using the SRK/T formula with IOL Master 700 (Carl Zeiss) as the bag power. The recommended value of 119.0 was used for the A-constant. The actual refractive spherical equivalent was calculated and compared with preoperative predictions. Refractive prediction errors were defined as the deviation of the actual postoperative spherical equivalent refraction in diopters from the predicted preoperative spherical equivalent refraction. The patients were divided into three groups according to axial length: <22.0 mm (short eyes), 22.0– 24.5 mm (medium eyes), and >24.5 mm (long eyes), and the refractive prediction errors and mean absolute errors were compared. Results: The mean refractive prediction error was −0.20 ± 0.52D. The mean absolute error was 0.44 ± 0.33D. The mean refractive prediction errors were not significantly different between the 22.0–24.5 mm (medium eyes) and >24.5 mm (long eyes) groups. (P=0.06) The mean absolute errors were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.10). Conclusion: The SRK/T formula worked well regardless of whether the eyes were medium or long according to the axial length in the flanged intrascleral IOL fixation.","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s455178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive prediction error in flanged intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation using the SRK/T formula and compare the axial length using a single IOL. Methods: Seventy-six eyes from 70 patients (45 males and 25 females) were included in this study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 73.4 ±12.3 years. The patients underwent flanged IOL fixation using a PN6A (Kowa). All surgeries were performed by two surgeons (Y. K. and T. O.) between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022 at Jikei University Daisan Hospital. IOL power was calculated using the SRK/T formula with IOL Master 700 (Carl Zeiss) as the bag power. The recommended value of 119.0 was used for the A-constant. The actual refractive spherical equivalent was calculated and compared with preoperative predictions. Refractive prediction errors were defined as the deviation of the actual postoperative spherical equivalent refraction in diopters from the predicted preoperative spherical equivalent refraction. The patients were divided into three groups according to axial length: <22.0 mm (short eyes), 22.0– 24.5 mm (medium eyes), and >24.5 mm (long eyes), and the refractive prediction errors and mean absolute errors were compared. Results: The mean refractive prediction error was −0.20 ± 0.52D. The mean absolute error was 0.44 ± 0.33D. The mean refractive prediction errors were not significantly different between the 22.0–24.5 mm (medium eyes) and >24.5 mm (long eyes) groups. (P=0.06) The mean absolute errors were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.10). Conclusion: The SRK/T formula worked well regardless of whether the eyes were medium or long according to the axial length in the flanged intrascleral IOL fixation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法兰式巩膜内人工晶体固定中不同轴向长度的屈光预测误差比较
目的:使用 SRK/T 公式评估带瓣巩膜内人工晶体(IOL)固定的屈光预测误差,并比较使用单个人工晶体的轴向长度。方法本研究纳入了 70 名患者(45 名男性和 25 名女性)的 76 只眼睛。手术时的平均年龄为 73.4 ± 12.3 岁。患者使用 PN6A(Kowa)进行了法兰式人工晶体固定术。所有手术均由两名外科医生(Y. K. 和 T. O. )于 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在慈惠大学大山医院完成。IOL 功率使用 SRK/T 公式计算,IOL Master 700(卡尔蔡司)作为囊袋功率。A 常量采用建议值 119.0。计算实际屈光球面等值,并与术前预测进行比较。屈光预测误差被定义为术后实际球面等效屈光度与术前预测球面等效屈光度的偏差(以二度数为单位)。根据轴长(24.5 毫米,长眼)将患者分为三组,比较屈光预测误差和平均绝对误差。结果屈光预测误差的平均值为 -0.20 ± 0.52D。平均绝对误差为 0.44 ± 0.33D。平均屈光预测误差在 22.0-24.5 mm(中眼)组和 >24.5 mm(长眼)组之间无明显差异。(P=0.06)两组之间的平均绝对误差无明显差异(P=0.10)。结论:根据法兰式巩膜内人工晶体固定的轴向长度,无论中眼还是长眼,SRK/T公式的效果都很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension: The Randomized Phase III PEONY Trial Effectiveness of Suprachoroidal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy Using a Modified Custom Microneedle Automated Optic Nerve Head Hemoglobin Measurements versus General Ophthalmologists Evaluation to Differentiate Glaucomatous from Large Physiological Cupping: A Diagnostic Performance Comparative Study Management of Glaucoma-Related Dry Eye Disease with Intense Pulsed Light: A Randomized Control Study Evaluating a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Insert as Adjunctive Therapy for Inflammation and Pain Post-Corneal Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1