Optimising the sensitivity of optically-pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography to gamma band electrophysiological activity

Ryan M. Hill, Holly Schofield, E. Boto, Lukas Rier, James Osborne, Cody Doyle, Frank Worcester, Tyler Hayward, N. Holmes, Richard Bowtell, V. Shah, Matthew J. Brookes
{"title":"Optimising the sensitivity of optically-pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography to gamma band electrophysiological activity","authors":"Ryan M. Hill, Holly Schofield, E. Boto, Lukas Rier, James Osborne, Cody Doyle, Frank Worcester, Tyler Hayward, N. Holmes, Richard Bowtell, V. Shah, Matthew J. Brookes","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The measurement of electrophysiology is of critical importance to our understanding of brain function. However, current non-invasive measurements—electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG)—have limited sensitivity, particularly compared to invasive recordings. Optically-Pumped Magnetometers (OPMs) are a new type of magnetic field sensor which ostensibly promise MEG systems with higher sensitivity; however, the noise floor of current OPMs remains high compared to cryogenic instrumentation and this limits the achievable signal-to-noise ratio of OPM-MEG recordings. Here, we investigate how sensor array design affects sensitivity, and whether judicious sensor placement could compensate for the higher noise floor. Through theoretical analyses, simulations, and experiments, we use a beamformer framework to show that increasing the total signal measured by an OPM array—either by increasing the number of sensors and channels, or by optimising the placement of those sensors—affords a linearly proportional increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) following beamformer reconstruction. Our experimental measurements confirm this finding, showing that by changing sensor locations in a 90-channel array, we could increase the SNR of visual gamma oscillations from 4.8 to 10.5. Using a 180-channel optimised OPM-array, we capture broadband gamma oscillations induced by a naturalistic visual paradigm, with an SNR of 3; a value that compares favourably to similar measures made using conventional MEG. Our findings show how an OPM-MEG array can be optimised to measure brain electrophysiology with the highest possible sensitivity. This is important for the design of future OPM-based instrumentation.","PeriodicalId":507939,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Neuroscience","volume":"48 4","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The measurement of electrophysiology is of critical importance to our understanding of brain function. However, current non-invasive measurements—electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG)—have limited sensitivity, particularly compared to invasive recordings. Optically-Pumped Magnetometers (OPMs) are a new type of magnetic field sensor which ostensibly promise MEG systems with higher sensitivity; however, the noise floor of current OPMs remains high compared to cryogenic instrumentation and this limits the achievable signal-to-noise ratio of OPM-MEG recordings. Here, we investigate how sensor array design affects sensitivity, and whether judicious sensor placement could compensate for the higher noise floor. Through theoretical analyses, simulations, and experiments, we use a beamformer framework to show that increasing the total signal measured by an OPM array—either by increasing the number of sensors and channels, or by optimising the placement of those sensors—affords a linearly proportional increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) following beamformer reconstruction. Our experimental measurements confirm this finding, showing that by changing sensor locations in a 90-channel array, we could increase the SNR of visual gamma oscillations from 4.8 to 10.5. Using a 180-channel optimised OPM-array, we capture broadband gamma oscillations induced by a naturalistic visual paradigm, with an SNR of 3; a value that compares favourably to similar measures made using conventional MEG. Our findings show how an OPM-MEG array can be optimised to measure brain electrophysiology with the highest possible sensitivity. This is important for the design of future OPM-based instrumentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化光泵磁强计脑磁图对伽马带电生理活动的灵敏度
摘要 电生理学测量对我们了解大脑功能至关重要。然而,目前的非侵入式测量--脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)--灵敏度有限,尤其是与侵入式记录相比。光学泵浦磁力计(OPM)是一种新型磁场传感器,表面上看有望使 MEG 系统具有更高的灵敏度;然而,与低温仪器相比,目前 OPM 的本底噪声仍然很高,这限制了 OPM-MEG 记录的信噪比。在此,我们研究了传感器阵列设计如何影响灵敏度,以及明智的传感器布置是否能补偿较高的本底噪声。通过理论分析、模拟和实验,我们使用波束成形器框架来证明,增加 OPM 阵列测量的总信号--无论是通过增加传感器和通道的数量,还是通过优化这些传感器的位置--都能在波束成形器重建后使信噪比(SNR)成线性比例地增加。我们的实验测量证实了这一结论,结果表明,通过改变 90 通道阵列中传感器的位置,我们可以将视觉伽马振荡的信噪比从 4.8 提高到 10.5。通过使用 180 通道优化 OPM 阵列,我们捕捉到了由自然视觉范式诱发的宽带伽马振荡,信噪比为 3;这一数值优于使用传统 MEG 进行的类似测量。我们的研究结果表明了如何优化 OPM-MEG 阵列,以尽可能高的灵敏度测量大脑电生理学。这对于设计未来基于 OPM 的仪器非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization and validation of multi-echo, multi-contrast SAGE acquisition in fMRI BOLD fMRI responses to amplitude-modulated sounds across age in adult listeners Developmental trajectories of the default mode, frontoparietal, and salience networks from the third trimester through the newborn period GABA levels decline with age: A longitudinal study Unveiling hidden sources of dynamic functional connectome through a novel regularized blind source separation approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1