How a 5-Day Stay in the Tobacco-Free Environment of the Stoptober House Supports Individuals to Quit Smoking: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY European Addiction Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1159/000537929
Floor A Van den Brand, Thomas Martinelli, Charlotte I de Haan-Bouma, Gert-Jan Meerkerk, Bjorn Winkens, Gera E Nagelhout
{"title":"How a 5-Day Stay in the Tobacco-Free Environment of the Stoptober House Supports Individuals to Quit Smoking: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Floor A Van den Brand, Thomas Martinelli, Charlotte I de Haan-Bouma, Gert-Jan Meerkerk, Bjorn Winkens, Gera E Nagelhout","doi":"10.1159/000537929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Stoptober House is part of the annual national Stoptober smoking cessation campaign in the Netherlands. During the first week of October, 48 volunteers resided in the tobacco-free Stoptober House for 5 days and received smoking cessation counseling. This pilot study explored how the Stoptober House may have facilitated smoking cessation among participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 48 individuals who were selected for the Stoptober House (intervention group) and 67 individuals who were not selected (control group). Surveys were conducted at baseline, immediately after 2 and 8 weeks of post-intervention. We compared self-reported abstinence, psychosocial mediators related to smoking cessation, and perceived active elements of the Stoptober House between the intervention and control groups using t/χ2 tests and linear mixed model (LMM) analysis. Sixteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to explore participants' perspectives on the elements contributing to their success in quitting smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 8 weeks of follow-up, a higher proportion of participants in the intervention group (24/48 [50%]) reported being abstinent compared to the control group (5/67 [7%]; p &lt; 0.001). Among participants who reported making a quit attempt, 22/38 (57.9%) in the intervention group remained abstinent compared to 4/17 (23.5%) in the control group (p = 0.022). The intervention group also exhibited higher self-efficacy to quit smoking throughout the follow-up period and higher social support immediately after the Stoptober House. No significant differences were observed in other psychosocial factors. The interviews highlighted several perceived elements of the Stoptober House that contributed to smoking cessation success, including restricted smoking opportunities, access to smoking cessation counselors, and peer support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests that the Stoptober House provides support that can help people quit smoking. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the cost-effectiveness of this intervention in promoting long-term abstinence among specific groups of smokers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":" ","pages":"103-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537929","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Stoptober House is part of the annual national Stoptober smoking cessation campaign in the Netherlands. During the first week of October, 48 volunteers resided in the tobacco-free Stoptober House for 5 days and received smoking cessation counseling. This pilot study explored how the Stoptober House may have facilitated smoking cessation among participants.

Methods: We included 48 individuals who were selected for the Stoptober House (intervention group) and 67 individuals who were not selected (control group). Surveys were conducted at baseline, immediately after 2 and 8 weeks of post-intervention. We compared self-reported abstinence, psychosocial mediators related to smoking cessation, and perceived active elements of the Stoptober House between the intervention and control groups using t/χ2 tests and linear mixed model (LMM) analysis. Sixteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to explore participants' perspectives on the elements contributing to their success in quitting smoking.

Results: At 8 weeks of follow-up, a higher proportion of participants in the intervention group (24/48 [50%]) reported being abstinent compared to the control group (5/67 [7%]; p < 0.001). Among participants who reported making a quit attempt, 22/38 (57.9%) in the intervention group remained abstinent compared to 4/17 (23.5%) in the control group (p = 0.022). The intervention group also exhibited higher self-efficacy to quit smoking throughout the follow-up period and higher social support immediately after the Stoptober House. No significant differences were observed in other psychosocial factors. The interviews highlighted several perceived elements of the Stoptober House that contributed to smoking cessation success, including restricted smoking opportunities, access to smoking cessation counselors, and peer support.

Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that the Stoptober House provides support that can help people quit smoking. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the cost-effectiveness of this intervention in promoting long-term abstinence among specific groups of smokers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 "停止吸烟之家 "的无烟环境中停留 5 天如何帮助个人戒烟:混合方法试点研究。
简介戒烟之家 "是荷兰一年一度的全国 "停止吸烟 "活动的一部分。在 10 月份的第一周,48 名志愿者在无烟的 "停止吸烟之家 "居住了 5 天,并接受了戒烟咨询。这项试点研究探讨了 "停止吸烟之家 "如何促进参与者戒烟:我们纳入了 48 名被选中参加 "停止吸烟之家 "的人员(干预组)和 67 名未被选中的人员(对照组)。在基线、干预后 2 周和 8 周后立即进行了调查。我们使用 t/χ2 检验和线性混合模型(LMM)分析,比较了干预组和对照组的自我戒烟报告、与戒烟相关的社会心理中介因素以及对 "停止吸烟之家 "积极因素的感知。此外,还进行了16次半结构化定性访谈,以探讨参与者对戒烟成功要素的看法:在8周的随访中,与对照组(5/67 [7%];p <0.001)相比,干预组有更高比例的参与者(24/48 [50%])表示戒烟。在报告尝试戒烟的参与者中,干预组有 22/38 人(57.9%)保持戒烟,而对照组只有 4/17 人(23.5%)保持戒烟(p = 0.022)。干预组在整个随访期间也表现出更高的戒烟自我效能感,并在 "停止吸烟之家 "结束后立即获得了更高的社会支持。在其他社会心理因素方面没有观察到明显差异。访谈强调了 "停止吸烟之家 "中有助于戒烟成功的几个可感知因素,包括限制吸烟机会、接触戒烟顾问和同伴支持:这项试点研究表明,"停止吸烟之家 "提供的支持可以帮助人们戒烟。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并确定这一干预措施在促进特定吸烟者群体长期戒烟方面的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Machine Learning Based Adjustments to an eHealth Intervention Targeting Mild Alcohol Use. Impact of working conditions and other determinants on the risk of substance misuse among healthcare residents: results of a cross-sectional study. ESCAPE study: Cannabidiol use in patients treated for substance use disorders, prevalence of use and characteristics of users. Exploring Recovery Priorities in Inpatient Addiction Treatment: A Q-Methodological Study. Global Assessment of Training Needs in Addiction Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1