Using stink bug migration behavior for physical exclusion.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Environmental Entomology Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1093/ee/nvae025
Adrian T Marshall, Elizabeth H Beers
{"title":"Using stink bug migration behavior for physical exclusion.","authors":"Adrian T Marshall, Elizabeth H Beers","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvae025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stink bugs have become an increasing concern for tree fruit growers due to changing management strategies and the introduction of an invasive species. The use of broad-spectrum insecticides for stink bug control disrupts biological control and leads to secondary pest outbreaks. To seek alternative tactics, we investigated the physical exclusion of native stink bugs with single-wall net barriers at orchard borders. First, stink bug capture on clear sticky panels along orchard edges showed that movement between the native shrub-steppe vegetation and the orchard occurs for much of the growing season instead of the presumed single migration event in August. Most stink bugs were captured between 1 m and 3 m heights, signifying a 4 m exclusion barrier would intercept migrating bugs. We tested large net barriers (4 m × 23 m) constructed of plain netting with or without deltamethrin-infused netting in flaps compared to a no-net control. The capture of target and nontarget arthropods was determined with plastic tarps below the nets or on the open ground of the control. Net barriers did not directly affect stink bug densities in the orchards, although orchard populations were low overall. Barriers did intercept stink bugs, and the addition of deltamethrin flaps enhanced stink bug mortality but at the price of nontarget arthropod mortality. Our results indicate that stink bug management efforts should focus earlier in the growing season and given the long period of migration, barriers are a more sustainable way of slowing movement into the orchard than the current sole reliance on chemical control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":" ","pages":"338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stink bugs have become an increasing concern for tree fruit growers due to changing management strategies and the introduction of an invasive species. The use of broad-spectrum insecticides for stink bug control disrupts biological control and leads to secondary pest outbreaks. To seek alternative tactics, we investigated the physical exclusion of native stink bugs with single-wall net barriers at orchard borders. First, stink bug capture on clear sticky panels along orchard edges showed that movement between the native shrub-steppe vegetation and the orchard occurs for much of the growing season instead of the presumed single migration event in August. Most stink bugs were captured between 1 m and 3 m heights, signifying a 4 m exclusion barrier would intercept migrating bugs. We tested large net barriers (4 m × 23 m) constructed of plain netting with or without deltamethrin-infused netting in flaps compared to a no-net control. The capture of target and nontarget arthropods was determined with plastic tarps below the nets or on the open ground of the control. Net barriers did not directly affect stink bug densities in the orchards, although orchard populations were low overall. Barriers did intercept stink bugs, and the addition of deltamethrin flaps enhanced stink bug mortality but at the price of nontarget arthropod mortality. Our results indicate that stink bug management efforts should focus earlier in the growing season and given the long period of migration, barriers are a more sustainable way of slowing movement into the orchard than the current sole reliance on chemical control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用蝽的迁移行为进行物理排斥。
由于管理策略的改变和入侵物种的引入,臭虫已成为果树种植者日益关注的问题。使用广谱杀虫剂控制蝽扰乱了生物防治,导致害虫二次爆发。为了寻求替代策略,我们研究了在果园边界使用单层网屏障物理驱除本地蝽象的方法。首先,在果园边缘的透明粘板上捕捉蝽象表明,原生灌木草原植被和果园之间的迁移发生在生长季节的大部分时间,而不是假定的八月份的单一迁移事件。大多数臭虫在 1 米至 3 米高处被捕获,这表明 4 米高的隔离网可以拦截迁徙的臭虫。我们测试了大型网障(4 m × 23 m)与无网障对照组的比较,前者是由普通网构成的,后者在挡板中加入或未加入溴氰菊酯。目标节肢动物和非目标节肢动物的捕获量是在网的下方或对照组的空地上用塑料油布测定的。尽管果园中的蝽类数量总体较低,但网障并没有直接影响果园中蝽类的密度。障碍物确实能拦截蝽象,而添加溴氰菊酯挡板能提高蝽象的死亡率,但代价是非目标节肢动物的死亡。我们的研究结果表明,蝽象管理工作的重点应放在生长季节的早期,考虑到蝽象的迁徙时间较长,与目前单纯依靠化学防治相比,障碍物是减缓蝽象向果园迁徙的一种更可持续的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Influence of different diet categories on gut bacterial diversity in Frankliniella occidentalis. A review of non-microbial biological control strategies against the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Addition of ammonium acetate to torula yeast borax and its effect on captures of three species of economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Testing the efficacy of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) as a inundative biological control agent in Western Nebraska. Sex-ratio distortion in a weed biological control agent, Ceratapion basicorne (Coleoptera: Brentidae), associated with a species of Rickettsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1