Yield and Utility of Routine Epilepsy Panel Genetic Testing Among Young Patients With Seizures.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1177/08830738241240516
Emily Grew, Mayuri Reddy, Hayley Reichner, Jinsoo Kim, Misbah Salam, Anjum Hashim
{"title":"Yield and Utility of Routine Epilepsy Panel Genetic Testing Among Young Patients With Seizures.","authors":"Emily Grew, Mayuri Reddy, Hayley Reichner, Jinsoo Kim, Misbah Salam, Anjum Hashim","doi":"10.1177/08830738241240516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We examined the yield of routine epilepsy panel genetic testing in pediatric patients. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed epilepsy genetic panel results routinely performed in the hospital or clinic on patients <8 years old from July 2021 to July 2023. We evaluated demographics, family history, seizure type, severity, and frequency, development, tone and movement abnormalities, dysmorphism, and electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results as predictors of results. <b>Results:</b> 65 patients were included with mean age 4.5 years. Sixty percent of patients were male; 11 patients had pathogenic variants (16.9%), 7 were carriers for autosomal recessive conditions (10.8%), 36 had variants of uncertain significance (55.4%), and 11 tested negative (16.9%). Pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance were unassociated with demographics, clinical features, imaging, or family history. <b>Conclusion:</b> Variants identified have potential implications for treatment (<i>SCN1</i>), comorbidity screening (<i>TSC1</i>), reproduction (<i>ATAD1</i>, <i>PSAT1</i>, and <i>CLN8</i>), and prognostication (<i>FOXG1</i>). Patients not routinely screened for a genetic cause of epilepsy by our standard practices had clinically relevant results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738241240516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We examined the yield of routine epilepsy panel genetic testing in pediatric patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed epilepsy genetic panel results routinely performed in the hospital or clinic on patients <8 years old from July 2021 to July 2023. We evaluated demographics, family history, seizure type, severity, and frequency, development, tone and movement abnormalities, dysmorphism, and electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results as predictors of results. Results: 65 patients were included with mean age 4.5 years. Sixty percent of patients were male; 11 patients had pathogenic variants (16.9%), 7 were carriers for autosomal recessive conditions (10.8%), 36 had variants of uncertain significance (55.4%), and 11 tested negative (16.9%). Pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance were unassociated with demographics, clinical features, imaging, or family history. Conclusion: Variants identified have potential implications for treatment (SCN1), comorbidity screening (TSC1), reproduction (ATAD1, PSAT1, and CLN8), and prognostication (FOXG1). Patients not routinely screened for a genetic cause of epilepsy by our standard practices had clinically relevant results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对年轻癫痫发作患者进行常规癫痫面板基因检测的收益和效用。
目的:我们研究了儿科患者常规癫痫小组基因检测的结果。方法: 我们回顾性地检查了医院或诊所对患者常规进行的癫痫基因检测结果:我们回顾性地检查了医院或诊所对患者常规进行的癫痫基因检测结果 结果:65 例患者,平均年龄 4.5 岁:共纳入 65 名患者,平均年龄为 4.5 岁。60%的患者为男性;11 名患者存在致病变异(16.9%),7 名患者为常染色体隐性遗传病携带者(10.8%),36 名患者存在意义不明的变异(55.4%),11 名患者检测结果为阴性(16.9%)。致病变异和意义不明的变异与人口统计学、临床特征、影像学或家族史无关。结论发现的变异对治疗(SCN1)、合并症筛查(TSC1)、生殖(ATAD1、PSAT1 和 CLN8)和预后(FOXG1)有潜在影响。按照我们的标准做法,未进行常规癫痫遗传病因筛查的患者也得到了与临床相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Neurology
Journal of Child Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Neurology (JCN) embraces peer-reviewed clinical and investigative studies from a wide-variety of neuroscience disciplines. Focusing on the needs of neurologic patients from birth to age 18 years, JCN covers topics ranging from assessment of new and changing therapies and procedures; diagnosis, evaluation, and management of neurologic, neuropsychiatric, and neurodevelopmental disorders; and pathophysiology of central nervous system diseases.
期刊最新文献
Anti-CD20 Therapy in Children With Severe Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Meningoencephalitis. First-Drug Efficacy and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Rates in Children With New-Onset Epilepsies: A Multicenter Large Cohort Study. Hammersmith Neonatal and Infant Neurological Examinations Scores in Typically Developing Infants Aged 1-6 Months. Determination of Health Concepts in β-Propeller Protein-Associated Neurodegeneration. The Initial Experience of Eslicarbazepine in Children at Three Canadian Tertiary Pediatric Care Centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1