Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Pilot Study on Comparable Efficacy in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Cough.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.4168/aair.2024.16.2.191
Shuxin Zhong, Mingyu Zhong, Liman Fang, Haopeng Zhi, Xiaolong Ji, Kailun Tang, Chen Zhan, Xu Shi, Mo Xian, Wanjun Wang, Jing Li, Wei Luo, Kefang Lai, Ruchong Chen
{"title":"Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Pilot Study on Comparable Efficacy in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Cough.","authors":"Shuxin Zhong, Mingyu Zhong, Liman Fang, Haopeng Zhi, Xiaolong Ji, Kailun Tang, Chen Zhan, Xu Shi, Mo Xian, Wanjun Wang, Jing Li, Wei Luo, Kefang Lai, Ruchong Chen","doi":"10.4168/aair.2024.16.2.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acid inhibitors have been considered in treating gastroesophageal reflux-related cough (GERC). Compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have more potent and durable effects on anti-acid secretion. However, whether vonoprazan and esomeprazole have different therapeutic effects on GERC remains unknown. Patients diagnosed with GERC were enrolled in our study and randomly treated with vonoprazan (20 mg, once daily, P-CAB) or esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily, PPI) for two months. A prokinetic agent was also administered. Patients were followed up once a month. Cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as the primary outcome, while cough symptom score (CSS) and scores for cough-related quality-of-life or reflux-related symptoms were the secondary endpoints. A total of 50 patients completed the study, with 25 patients in each group. P-CAB and PPI groups showed similar decreases in cough severity VAS and CSS scores after the 2-month treatment (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). For quality-of-life, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score increased significantly from baseline in both groups, but the P-CAB group had greater improvement and a higher LCQ score in month 2 (all <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). For reflux-related symptoms, the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) score declined substantially over time in the P-CAB group, while the reflux symptom index (RSI) score decreased in both groups. The P-CAB group tended to have a lower HARQ (<i>P</i> = 0.051) and RSI (<i>P</i> = 0.069) scores in month 2. In conclusion, vonoprazan may be comparable to esomeprazole in cough symptom relief in GERC during the 2-month treatment period, but possibly provides better gains on classic reflux symptoms and quality-of-life. The long-term efficacy of P-CABs on GERC may be worth further exploration. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200067089.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"16 2","pages":"191-201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.2.191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acid inhibitors have been considered in treating gastroesophageal reflux-related cough (GERC). Compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have more potent and durable effects on anti-acid secretion. However, whether vonoprazan and esomeprazole have different therapeutic effects on GERC remains unknown. Patients diagnosed with GERC were enrolled in our study and randomly treated with vonoprazan (20 mg, once daily, P-CAB) or esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily, PPI) for two months. A prokinetic agent was also administered. Patients were followed up once a month. Cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as the primary outcome, while cough symptom score (CSS) and scores for cough-related quality-of-life or reflux-related symptoms were the secondary endpoints. A total of 50 patients completed the study, with 25 patients in each group. P-CAB and PPI groups showed similar decreases in cough severity VAS and CSS scores after the 2-month treatment (all P < 0.001). For quality-of-life, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score increased significantly from baseline in both groups, but the P-CAB group had greater improvement and a higher LCQ score in month 2 (all P ≤ 0.05). For reflux-related symptoms, the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) score declined substantially over time in the P-CAB group, while the reflux symptom index (RSI) score decreased in both groups. The P-CAB group tended to have a lower HARQ (P = 0.051) and RSI (P = 0.069) scores in month 2. In conclusion, vonoprazan may be comparable to esomeprazole in cough symptom relief in GERC during the 2-month treatment period, but possibly provides better gains on classic reflux symptoms and quality-of-life. The long-term efficacy of P-CABs on GERC may be worth further exploration. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200067089.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钾竞争性酸阻滞剂与质子泵抑制剂:治疗胃食管反流性咳嗽疗效相当的试点研究
在治疗胃食管反流相关性咳嗽(GERC)时,一直考虑使用酸抑制剂。与质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)相比,钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CABs)具有更强、更持久的抗酸分泌作用。然而,vonoprazan和埃索美拉唑对GERC是否具有不同的治疗效果仍是未知数。被诊断为 GERC 的患者被纳入了我们的研究,并随机接受了两个月的冯诺普拉赞(20 毫克,每天一次,P-CAB)或埃索美拉唑(20 毫克,每天两次,PPI)治疗。同时还使用了促激剂。患者每月接受一次随访。咳嗽严重程度视觉模拟量表(VAS)是主要结果,咳嗽症状评分(CSS)和咳嗽相关生活质量或反流相关症状评分是次要终点。共有 50 名患者完成了研究,每组 25 人。经过 2 个月的治疗后,P-CAB 组和 PPI 组的咳嗽严重程度 VAS 和 CSS 评分下降幅度相似(P 均小于 0.001)。在生活质量方面,两组患者的莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)得分均较基线有显著提高,但 P-CAB 组的改善幅度更大,第 2 个月的 LCQ 得分更高(所有 P 均小于 0.05)。在反流相关症状方面,随着时间的推移,P-CAB 组的赫尔气道反流问卷 (HARQ) 得分大幅下降,而两组的反流症状指数 (RSI) 得分均有所下降。总之,在 2 个月的治疗期间,在缓解 GERC 咳嗽症状方面,vonoprazan 的疗效可能与埃索美拉唑相当,但在典型反流症状和生活质量方面可能有更好的改善。P-CABs对GERC的长期疗效值得进一步探讨。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心识别码:ChiCTR2200067089ChiCTR2200067089。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
期刊最新文献
Involvement of the Constitutive Photomorphogenesis 9 Signalosome Subunit 5 With Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Ligand in Asthma. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Biomarker in Refractory Non-Type 2 CRSwNP. Oral Administration of Lactococcus lactis Expressing Mite and Cockroach Major Allergens Alleviates Progression of Atopic March in a Mouse Model. Skin Lipid Barrier: Structure, Function and Metabolism. Treatment With Upadacitinib in Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1