Where the small things are: Modelling edge effects on mouse lemur population density and distribution in northwestern Madagascar.

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY American Journal of Primatology Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1002/ajp.23621
Fernando Mercado Malabet, Malcolm Ramsay, Coral Chell, Bertrand Andriatsitohaina, Ute Radespiel, Shawn Lehman
{"title":"Where the small things are: Modelling edge effects on mouse lemur population density and distribution in northwestern Madagascar.","authors":"Fernando Mercado Malabet, Malcolm Ramsay, Coral Chell, Bertrand Andriatsitohaina, Ute Radespiel, Shawn Lehman","doi":"10.1002/ajp.23621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Edge effects result from the penetration to varying depths and intensities, of abiotic and biotic conditions from the surrounding non-forest matrix into the forest interior. Although 70% of the world's forests are within 1 km of a forest edge, making edge effects a dominant feature of most forest habitats, there are few empirical data on inter-site differences in edge responses in primates. We used spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) models to determine spatial patterns of density for two species of mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus and Microcebus ravelobensis) in two forest landscapes in northwestern Madagascar. The goal of our study was to determine if mouse lemurs displayed spatially variable responses to edge effects. We trapped animals using Sherman live traps in the Mariarano Classified Forest (MCF) and in the Ambanjabe Forest Fragment Site (AFFS) site within Ankarafantsika National Park. We trapped 126 M. murinus and 79 M. ravelobensis at MCF and 78 M. murinus and 308 M. ravelobensis at AFFS. For M. murinus, our top model predicted a positive edge response, where density increased towards edge habitats. In M. ravelobensis, our top model predicted a negative edge response, where density was lower near the forest edges and increased towards the forest interior. At regional and landscape-specific scales, SECR models estimated different density patterns between M. murinus and M. ravelobensis as a result of variation in edge distance. The spatial variability of our results using SECR models indicate the importance of studying the population ecology of primates at varying scales that are appropriate to the processes of interest. Our results lend further support to the theory that some lemurs exhibit a form of ecological flexibility in their responses to forest loss, forest fragmentation, and associated edge effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":" ","pages":"e23621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Edge effects result from the penetration to varying depths and intensities, of abiotic and biotic conditions from the surrounding non-forest matrix into the forest interior. Although 70% of the world's forests are within 1 km of a forest edge, making edge effects a dominant feature of most forest habitats, there are few empirical data on inter-site differences in edge responses in primates. We used spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) models to determine spatial patterns of density for two species of mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus and Microcebus ravelobensis) in two forest landscapes in northwestern Madagascar. The goal of our study was to determine if mouse lemurs displayed spatially variable responses to edge effects. We trapped animals using Sherman live traps in the Mariarano Classified Forest (MCF) and in the Ambanjabe Forest Fragment Site (AFFS) site within Ankarafantsika National Park. We trapped 126 M. murinus and 79 M. ravelobensis at MCF and 78 M. murinus and 308 M. ravelobensis at AFFS. For M. murinus, our top model predicted a positive edge response, where density increased towards edge habitats. In M. ravelobensis, our top model predicted a negative edge response, where density was lower near the forest edges and increased towards the forest interior. At regional and landscape-specific scales, SECR models estimated different density patterns between M. murinus and M. ravelobensis as a result of variation in edge distance. The spatial variability of our results using SECR models indicate the importance of studying the population ecology of primates at varying scales that are appropriate to the processes of interest. Our results lend further support to the theory that some lemurs exhibit a form of ecological flexibility in their responses to forest loss, forest fragmentation, and associated edge effects.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小东西在哪里?模拟马达加斯加西北部鼠狐猴种群密度和分布的边缘效应。
边缘效应是由于周围非森林基质的非生物和生物条件以不同的深度和强度渗透到森林内部而产生的。虽然世界上 70% 的森林都在森林边缘 1 公里范围内,这使得边缘效应成为大多数森林栖息地的主要特征,但有关灵长类动物边缘反应的地点间差异的经验数据却很少。我们使用空间显式捕获-再捕获(SECR)模型来确定马达加斯加西北部两个森林景观中两种鼠狐猴(Microcebus murinus 和 Microcebus ravelobensis)的密度空间模式。我们的研究目标是确定鼠狐猴是否对边缘效应表现出不同的空间反应。我们使用谢尔曼活体诱捕器在马里亚拉诺分类森林(MCF)和安卡拉凡茨卡国家公园内的安班贾贝森林片区(AFFS)进行了诱捕。我们在MCF诱捕了126头M. murinus和79头M. ravelobensis,在AFFS诱捕了78头M. murinus和308头M. ravelobensis。对于M. murinus,我们的顶级模型预测其边缘反应为正,即密度向边缘栖息地增加。对于 M. ravelobensis,我们的顶级模型预测其边缘反应为负,即森林边缘附近密度较低,而森林内部密度增加。在区域和特定景观尺度上,SECR模型估计了M. murinus和M. ravelobensis之间不同的密度模式,这是边缘距离变化的结果。使用 SECR 模型得出的结果在空间上的差异性表明,在不同尺度上研究灵长类种群生态学的重要性,这些尺度应与感兴趣的过程相适应。我们的研究结果进一步支持了这样一种理论,即某些狐猴在对森林消失、森林破碎化及相关边缘效应的反应中表现出一种生态灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Analysis of the Carpal Tunnel and Its Inner Structures in Primates. Detecting a Stalker: The Effect of Body Posture, Gaze Direction, and Camouflage Pattern on Predator Detection. Teeth Baring as a Model to Understand Complex Facial Signals in a Tolerant Macaque Species. Issue Information Stable Isotopes Analysis of Black Lion Tamarins Reveals Increasing Arthropod Consumption When Fruit Productivity Decreases in Forest Fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1