Eugenics and genetic screening in television medical dramas.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2023-012882
Ayden Eilmus, Jay Clayton
{"title":"Eugenics and genetic screening in television medical dramas.","authors":"Ayden Eilmus, Jay Clayton","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2023-012882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical dramas offer unique insights into the way popular media makes sense of genetic technology and the ethics of its applications. In this paper we evaluate the contrasting depictions in television medical dramas of reproductive genetic screening and eugenics-two medical themes that some commentators see as closely related. By conducting a content analysis of 32 episodes of doctor shows featuring eugenic and/or genetic screening themes, we put the medical drama landscape in conversation with bioethics scholarship and mark a significant divergence between the two. While the academic literature has been parsing the possible relationship between genetic screening and eugenics for over 50 years, doctor shows tend to champion genetic screening as a powerful tool for promoting individual reproductive choice and criticise eugenics as a socially unjust infringement of reproductive freedom. In doing so, medical dramas mark a subtle but important moral distinction between the population-level implications of eugenics and the highly personal, emotional impact of genetic screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":"408-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical dramas offer unique insights into the way popular media makes sense of genetic technology and the ethics of its applications. In this paper we evaluate the contrasting depictions in television medical dramas of reproductive genetic screening and eugenics-two medical themes that some commentators see as closely related. By conducting a content analysis of 32 episodes of doctor shows featuring eugenic and/or genetic screening themes, we put the medical drama landscape in conversation with bioethics scholarship and mark a significant divergence between the two. While the academic literature has been parsing the possible relationship between genetic screening and eugenics for over 50 years, doctor shows tend to champion genetic screening as a powerful tool for promoting individual reproductive choice and criticise eugenics as a socially unjust infringement of reproductive freedom. In doing so, medical dramas mark a subtle but important moral distinction between the population-level implications of eugenics and the highly personal, emotional impact of genetic screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电视医疗剧中的优生学和基因筛查。
对于大众媒体如何理解基因技术及其应用的伦理问题,医疗剧提供了独特的见解。在本文中,我们评估了电视医疗剧中对生殖基因筛查和优生学的截然不同的描述--在一些评论家看来,这两个医学主题密切相关。通过对 32 集以优生学和/或基因筛查为主题的医生剧集进行内容分析,我们将医疗剧与生命伦理学学术研究结合起来,发现两者之间存在着明显的分歧。50 多年来,学术文献一直在解析基因筛查与优生学之间可能存在的关系,而医生剧则倾向于将基因筛查作为促进个人生育选择的有力工具,并批评优生学是对生育自由的社会不公正侵犯。通过这种方式,医疗剧在优生学的人口层面影响与基因筛查的高度个人化情感影响之间做出了微妙而重要的道德区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
期刊最新文献
Better together: a critical survey of conceptions of religious literacy and analysis of the implications for application to healthcare in the USA. "Maybe I'm immune": the twofold precarity of the asymptomatic HIV carrier in Will Self's Dorian, an Imitation. Teaching public health humanities: innovations from the field. Creativity as a core competency in medical education: the art of medicine. Zhuangzian philosophy as a guiding principle in medical AI: a path to overcoming bias and paternalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1