Corin M Kinkhabwala, Ryan Puccia, Melissa Montiel, Emily Duckworth, Charles Henry, Judith M Skoner, Laura Hetzler, Samuel Oyer, Krishna G Patel
{"title":"Speech Intelligibility in Patients with Facial Paralysis.","authors":"Corin M Kinkhabwala, Ryan Puccia, Melissa Montiel, Emily Duckworth, Charles Henry, Judith M Skoner, Laura Hetzler, Samuel Oyer, Krishna G Patel","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2023.0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with facial paralysis often report frustration with communication; however, there are limited data regarding intelligibility deficiencies. <b>Objective:</b> To compare speech intelligibility in patients with severe and non-severe facial paralysis, and in patients with or without synkinesis. <b>Methods:</b> Video and audio data were reviewed retrospectively. Groups were stratified as follows: Group A - severe paralysis (Sunnybrook 0-20) without synkinesis; Group B - non-severe (Sunnybrook >20) paralysis without synkinesis; and Group C - non-severe paralysis with synkinesis. Intelligibility was assessed by lay-people and a speech and language pathologist (SLP) using the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment Version 2 (FDA-2). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a Sunnybrook cutoff for intelligibility. <b>Results:</b> Eighty cases were reviewed with mean age 55.6, 53.8% female. 25.0% were in Group A, 30.0% Group B, and 45.0% in Group C. Lay-people rated 15.0% and the SLP rated 28.7% as having intelligibility deficiency. An ROC curve demonstrated that patients with Sunnybrook ≤18.5 were more likely to have intelligibility abnormality. <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients with Sunnybrook ≤18.5 are more likely to demonstrate intelligibility deficiency. Clinicians with a more trained ear are more likely to identify intelligibility abnormality compared with lay-people. Those with synkinesis are more intelligible compared with those without it.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"558-563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with facial paralysis often report frustration with communication; however, there are limited data regarding intelligibility deficiencies. Objective: To compare speech intelligibility in patients with severe and non-severe facial paralysis, and in patients with or without synkinesis. Methods: Video and audio data were reviewed retrospectively. Groups were stratified as follows: Group A - severe paralysis (Sunnybrook 0-20) without synkinesis; Group B - non-severe (Sunnybrook >20) paralysis without synkinesis; and Group C - non-severe paralysis with synkinesis. Intelligibility was assessed by lay-people and a speech and language pathologist (SLP) using the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment Version 2 (FDA-2). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a Sunnybrook cutoff for intelligibility. Results: Eighty cases were reviewed with mean age 55.6, 53.8% female. 25.0% were in Group A, 30.0% Group B, and 45.0% in Group C. Lay-people rated 15.0% and the SLP rated 28.7% as having intelligibility deficiency. An ROC curve demonstrated that patients with Sunnybrook ≤18.5 were more likely to have intelligibility abnormality. Conclusion: Patients with Sunnybrook ≤18.5 are more likely to demonstrate intelligibility deficiency. Clinicians with a more trained ear are more likely to identify intelligibility abnormality compared with lay-people. Those with synkinesis are more intelligible compared with those without it.