Incidence rates of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.01.001
Jin Lin Tan MBBS , Kingjin Heng MBBS , Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha PhD , Norma B. Bulamu PhD , Billingsley Kaambwa PhD , Rajvinder Singh MPhil
{"title":"Incidence rates of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jin Lin Tan MBBS ,&nbsp;Kingjin Heng MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha PhD ,&nbsp;Norma B. Bulamu PhD ,&nbsp;Billingsley Kaambwa PhD ,&nbsp;Rajvinder Singh MPhil","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Barrett’s esophagus (BE) surveillance is commonly performed to detect early dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, high-quality incidence rates for the development of dysplasia and EAC in patients with BE are limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide updated incidence rates for the development of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC in a population of patients with BE undergoing endoscopic surveillance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic search of Embase and MEDLINE from inception to September 2022. The goal was to identify studies reporting the incidence rates of LGD, EAC, or HGD/EAC as an outcome in patients with nondysplastic BE (NDBE), LGD, or HGD. Respective pooled incidence rates were estimated by using a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis comprising 2587 patients with a combined follow-up of 218,351 person-years. For patients with NDBE, pooled incidence rates for progression to LGD, HGD, EAC, and HGD/EAC were 4.29, .52, .21, and .57 per 100 person-years, respectively. For patients with LGD, pooled incidence rates were 3.18 (HGD), 1.16 (EAC), and 5.05 (HGD/EAC) per 100 person-years. For those with HGD, the pooled incidence rate for EAC was 14.16 per 100 person-years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Progression to EAC and HGD/EAC remained low for patients with NDBE. Patients with confirmed (by ≥2 pathologists) LGD may be more likely to develop EAC, prompting a need to assess current BE surveillance strategies in this group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 92-103.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000013/pdfft?md5=c13600bdc215cfcef5672eec9f140c6c&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) surveillance is commonly performed to detect early dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, high-quality incidence rates for the development of dysplasia and EAC in patients with BE are limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide updated incidence rates for the development of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC in a population of patients with BE undergoing endoscopic surveillance.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of Embase and MEDLINE from inception to September 2022. The goal was to identify studies reporting the incidence rates of LGD, EAC, or HGD/EAC as an outcome in patients with nondysplastic BE (NDBE), LGD, or HGD. Respective pooled incidence rates were estimated by using a meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis comprising 2587 patients with a combined follow-up of 218,351 person-years. For patients with NDBE, pooled incidence rates for progression to LGD, HGD, EAC, and HGD/EAC were 4.29, .52, .21, and .57 per 100 person-years, respectively. For patients with LGD, pooled incidence rates were 3.18 (HGD), 1.16 (EAC), and 5.05 (HGD/EAC) per 100 person-years. For those with HGD, the pooled incidence rate for EAC was 14.16 per 100 person-years.

Conclusions

Progression to EAC and HGD/EAC remained low for patients with NDBE. Patients with confirmed (by ≥2 pathologists) LGD may be more likely to develop EAC, prompting a need to assess current BE surveillance strategies in this group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴雷特食管和食管腺癌的发病率:系统回顾与荟萃分析
背景和目的对巴雷特食管(BE)进行监测通常是为了检测早期发育不良和食管腺癌(EAC)。然而,BE 患者中发育不良和 EAC 的高质量发病率却很有限。本研究旨在对接受内镜监测的 BE 患者进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以提供低级别发育不良 (LGD)、高级别发育不良 (HGD) 和 EAC 的最新发病率。我们对Embase和MEDLINE进行了系统检索,检索时间为2022年9月,目的是找出报告非增生性BE(NDBE)、LGD或HGD患者中LGD、EAC或HGD/EAC发病率的研究。结果这项荟萃分析共纳入了 2587 例患者的 255 项研究,总随访时间为 218,351 人年。对于 NDBE 患者,进展为 LGD、HGD、EAC 和 HGD/EAC 的汇总发病率分别为每 100 人年 4.29、0.52、0.21 和 0.57。对于 LGD 患者,汇总发病率分别为每 100 人年 3.18 例(HGD)、1.16 例(EAC)和 5.05 例(HGD/EAC)。结论NDBE患者进展为EAC和HGD/EAC的比例仍然很低。经确诊(由≥2名病理学家确诊)为LGD的患者可能更容易发展为EAC,因此有必要对这一群体目前的BE监测策略进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preliminary validation of the virtual bariatric endoscopic simulator Unexpected clipping failure of a full-thickness resection device during endoscopic full-thickness resection Transgastric biliary drainage through a biliodigestive efferent loop using a lumen-apposing metal stent Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience Novel hemostatic adhesive powder to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the GI tract: first U.S. multicenter experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1