Jin Lin Tan MBBS , Kingjin Heng MBBS , Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha PhD , Norma B. Bulamu PhD , Billingsley Kaambwa PhD , Rajvinder Singh MPhil
{"title":"Incidence rates of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jin Lin Tan MBBS , Kingjin Heng MBBS , Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha PhD , Norma B. Bulamu PhD , Billingsley Kaambwa PhD , Rajvinder Singh MPhil","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Barrett’s esophagus (BE) surveillance is commonly performed to detect early dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, high-quality incidence rates for the development of dysplasia and EAC in patients with BE are limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide updated incidence rates for the development of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC in a population of patients with BE undergoing endoscopic surveillance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic search of Embase and MEDLINE from inception to September 2022. The goal was to identify studies reporting the incidence rates of LGD, EAC, or HGD/EAC as an outcome in patients with nondysplastic BE (NDBE), LGD, or HGD. Respective pooled incidence rates were estimated by using a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis comprising 2587 patients with a combined follow-up of 218,351 person-years. For patients with NDBE, pooled incidence rates for progression to LGD, HGD, EAC, and HGD/EAC were 4.29, .52, .21, and .57 per 100 person-years, respectively. For patients with LGD, pooled incidence rates were 3.18 (HGD), 1.16 (EAC), and 5.05 (HGD/EAC) per 100 person-years. For those with HGD, the pooled incidence rate for EAC was 14.16 per 100 person-years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Progression to EAC and HGD/EAC remained low for patients with NDBE. Patients with confirmed (by ≥2 pathologists) LGD may be more likely to develop EAC, prompting a need to assess current BE surveillance strategies in this group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 92-103.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000013/pdfft?md5=c13600bdc215cfcef5672eec9f140c6c&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
Barrett’s esophagus (BE) surveillance is commonly performed to detect early dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, high-quality incidence rates for the development of dysplasia and EAC in patients with BE are limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide updated incidence rates for the development of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC in a population of patients with BE undergoing endoscopic surveillance.
Methods
We performed a systematic search of Embase and MEDLINE from inception to September 2022. The goal was to identify studies reporting the incidence rates of LGD, EAC, or HGD/EAC as an outcome in patients with nondysplastic BE (NDBE), LGD, or HGD. Respective pooled incidence rates were estimated by using a meta-analysis.
Results
Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis comprising 2587 patients with a combined follow-up of 218,351 person-years. For patients with NDBE, pooled incidence rates for progression to LGD, HGD, EAC, and HGD/EAC were 4.29, .52, .21, and .57 per 100 person-years, respectively. For patients with LGD, pooled incidence rates were 3.18 (HGD), 1.16 (EAC), and 5.05 (HGD/EAC) per 100 person-years. For those with HGD, the pooled incidence rate for EAC was 14.16 per 100 person-years.
Conclusions
Progression to EAC and HGD/EAC remained low for patients with NDBE. Patients with confirmed (by ≥2 pathologists) LGD may be more likely to develop EAC, prompting a need to assess current BE surveillance strategies in this group.