Syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy results in good safety and short-term outcomes in the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1177/17085381241242164
Wanglong Li, Yichen Lin, Kunfeng Su, Fanggang Cai, Jinchi Zhang, Xiaoling Lai, Xiaoqi Zheng, Pingfan Guo, Xinhuang Hou, Yiquan Dai
{"title":"Syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy results in good safety and short-term outcomes in the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis.","authors":"Wanglong Li, Yichen Lin, Kunfeng Su, Fanggang Cai, Jinchi Zhang, Xiaoling Lai, Xiaoqi Zheng, Pingfan Guo, Xinhuang Hou, Yiquan Dai","doi":"10.1177/17085381241242164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term outcomes and safety of syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study of hospitalized patients with iliofemoral and/or inferior vena caval deep venous thrombosis, excluding those with pulmonary embolism. We collected the following patient data from the electronic medical records: age, sex, provoked/unprovoked deep venous thrombosis, symptom duration, thrombosed segments, and the presence of a tumor, thrombophilia, diabetes, and/or iliac vein compression syndrome. Venography and computed tomographic venography were performed in all patients before the procedure. All patients underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy under local anesthesia and sedation, and all received low-molecular-weight heparin peri-operatively. All patients underwent implantation of an inferior vena caval filter. Rivaroxaban was administered post-procedure, instead of heparin, for 3-6 months, with lower extremity compression.ResultsOverall, 29 patients with deep venous thrombosis underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy from January 2022 to October 2022 in our institution. Technical success (>70% thrombus resolution) was achieved in all patients, and using a single procedure in 25/29 patients (86%). Concomitant stenting was performed in 18/29 (62%) of the patients, and 21/29 (69%) underwent angioplasty. The median (interquartile range) procedure time was 110 min (100-122), the median intra-operative bleeding volume was 150 mL (120-180), and the median decrease in the hemoglobin concentration from pre- to post-operative was 7 g/L (4-14). The median follow-up duration was 7 months (5-9). All patients obtained symptomatic relief, and 27/29 achieved near-remission or full remission (combined total). No patients experienced peri-operative bleeding complications, or symptom recurrence or post-thrombectomy syndrome during follow-up.ConclusionThe short-term outcomes following syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis were excellent, and the procedure was safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"376-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241242164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term outcomes and safety of syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study of hospitalized patients with iliofemoral and/or inferior vena caval deep venous thrombosis, excluding those with pulmonary embolism. We collected the following patient data from the electronic medical records: age, sex, provoked/unprovoked deep venous thrombosis, symptom duration, thrombosed segments, and the presence of a tumor, thrombophilia, diabetes, and/or iliac vein compression syndrome. Venography and computed tomographic venography were performed in all patients before the procedure. All patients underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy under local anesthesia and sedation, and all received low-molecular-weight heparin peri-operatively. All patients underwent implantation of an inferior vena caval filter. Rivaroxaban was administered post-procedure, instead of heparin, for 3-6 months, with lower extremity compression.ResultsOverall, 29 patients with deep venous thrombosis underwent syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy from January 2022 to October 2022 in our institution. Technical success (>70% thrombus resolution) was achieved in all patients, and using a single procedure in 25/29 patients (86%). Concomitant stenting was performed in 18/29 (62%) of the patients, and 21/29 (69%) underwent angioplasty. The median (interquartile range) procedure time was 110 min (100-122), the median intra-operative bleeding volume was 150 mL (120-180), and the median decrease in the hemoglobin concentration from pre- to post-operative was 7 g/L (4-14). The median follow-up duration was 7 months (5-9). All patients obtained symptomatic relief, and 27/29 achieved near-remission or full remission (combined total). No patients experienced peri-operative bleeding complications, or symptom recurrence or post-thrombectomy syndrome during follow-up.ConclusionThe short-term outcomes following syringe-assisted test-aspiration with mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis were excellent, and the procedure was safe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注射器辅助测试抽吸和机械抽吸血栓切除术在治疗深静脉血栓患者方面具有良好的安全性和短期疗效。
目的评估注射器辅助测试抽吸和机械抽吸血栓切除术治疗深静脉血栓的短期疗效和安全性:这是一项针对髂股静脉和/或下腔静脉深静脉血栓住院患者(不包括肺栓塞患者)的单中心回顾性研究。我们从电子病历中收集了患者的以下数据:年龄、性别、诱发/非诱发深静脉血栓形成、症状持续时间、血栓形成部位,以及是否患有肿瘤、血栓性疾病、糖尿病和/或髂静脉压迫综合征。手术前对所有患者进行静脉造影和计算机断层扫描静脉造影。所有患者都在局部麻醉和镇静状态下接受了注射器辅助测试抽吸和机械抽吸血栓切除术,所有患者都在围手术期接受了低分子量肝素治疗。所有患者都植入了下腔静脉过滤器。术后使用利伐沙班替代肝素3-6个月,并对下肢进行压迫:自2022年1月至2022年10月,共有29名深静脉血栓患者在我院接受了注射器辅助测试抽吸和机械抽吸血栓切除术。所有患者都取得了技术成功(血栓清除率大于 70%),其中 25/29 例患者(86%)采用了单次手术。18/29(62%)名患者同时进行了支架植入术,21/29(69%)名患者进行了血管成形术。手术时间中位数(四分位数间距)为110分钟(100-122),术中出血量中位数为150毫升(120-180),血红蛋白浓度从术前到术后的中位数降幅为7克/升(4-14)。中位随访时间为 7 个月(5-9 个月)。所有患者的症状均得到缓解,27/29 例患者的症状接近缓解或完全缓解(合计总数)。随访期间,没有患者出现围手术期出血并发症、症状复发或血栓切除术后综合征:结论:注射器辅助测试抽吸和机械抽吸血栓切除术治疗深静脉血栓的短期疗效非常好,而且手术非常安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Basilic vein access as an effective alternative for endovascular embolization of pelvic varicose veins: A retrospective-cohort based population study. A seven-year single-center experience with large-bore percutaneous closure in endovascular aneurysm repair. Comparative efficacy of open endarterectomy versus endovascular treatments in common femoral artery stenocclusive disease: A Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis. Predicting treatment outcome in sclerotherapy of reticular veins and telangiectasia using machine learning: A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation. Conservative management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to type II endoleak.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1