Influences of Different Torques on the Size of the Microgap and Bacterial Leakage in Different Implant Systems: An In-vitro Study.

Hasna Alshubrmi, Mohammed A Mousa, Ibrahim A Taher, Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen, Kiran Kumar Ganji, Rakhi Issrani, Bader K Alzarea
{"title":"Influences of Different Torques on the Size of the Microgap and Bacterial Leakage in Different Implant Systems: An In-vitro Study.","authors":"Hasna Alshubrmi, Mohammed A Mousa, Ibrahim A Taher, Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen, Kiran Kumar Ganji, Rakhi Issrani, Bader K Alzarea","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the adherence of three types of bacteria [Staphylococcus (S) aureus, Escherichia (E) coli, Pseudomonas (Ps) aeruginosa] and the size of the microgap of three different implant systems (JD, ORA, and Ankylos) under four different screw torque values.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten samples for each tested implant system were used under different torques to determine the width of the gaps. The abutments were connected to the fixtures using a universal digital wrench. A torque value of 10 N/cm was applied for all samples. After the assessment of the microgap, the fixture was repositioned into the Bench Vice, and the torque was increased to 20, 30, and, finally, 40 N/cm. The microgap assessment was done using a Scanning Electron Microscope. Before the torque increased to 40, eleven samples for each tested implant system were used under 30 N/cm torque to determine the leakage in the tested implants for S. aureus, E. coli, and Ps. aeruginosa. Data were analyzed with multiple one-way ANOVA, Post Hoc, and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Ankylos system showed the widest gap under all torques (p < 0.005), whereas the JD system demonstrated the lowest (p < 0.005). Regarding the bacteria leakage, JD showed the highest adherence to the bacteria, and the adherence was mainly to the Ps. Aeruginosa, while the Ankylos system showed the lowest (p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within limits, the higher torque provides a higher fit to the IAI, offering more stability. Ankylos implant showed the widest gap, while JD showed the narrowest. Regarding the bacteria leakage, JD showed the highest adherence to Ps. Aeruginosa, while the ORA system showed the highest adherence to E. coli.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the adherence of three types of bacteria [Staphylococcus (S) aureus, Escherichia (E) coli, Pseudomonas (Ps) aeruginosa] and the size of the microgap of three different implant systems (JD, ORA, and Ankylos) under four different screw torque values.

Materials and methods: Ten samples for each tested implant system were used under different torques to determine the width of the gaps. The abutments were connected to the fixtures using a universal digital wrench. A torque value of 10 N/cm was applied for all samples. After the assessment of the microgap, the fixture was repositioned into the Bench Vice, and the torque was increased to 20, 30, and, finally, 40 N/cm. The microgap assessment was done using a Scanning Electron Microscope. Before the torque increased to 40, eleven samples for each tested implant system were used under 30 N/cm torque to determine the leakage in the tested implants for S. aureus, E. coli, and Ps. aeruginosa. Data were analyzed with multiple one-way ANOVA, Post Hoc, and chi-square tests.

Results: The Ankylos system showed the widest gap under all torques (p < 0.005), whereas the JD system demonstrated the lowest (p < 0.005). Regarding the bacteria leakage, JD showed the highest adherence to the bacteria, and the adherence was mainly to the Ps. Aeruginosa, while the Ankylos system showed the lowest (p < 0.005).

Conclusion: Within limits, the higher torque provides a higher fit to the IAI, offering more stability. Ankylos implant showed the widest gap, while JD showed the narrowest. Regarding the bacteria leakage, JD showed the highest adherence to Ps. Aeruginosa, while the ORA system showed the highest adherence to E. coli.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同扭矩对不同种植体系统微间隙大小和细菌渗漏的影响:体外研究
目的:评估三种不同种植体系统(JD、ORA 和 Ankylos)在四种不同螺钉扭矩值下的三种细菌[金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和绿脓杆菌]的附着情况和微间隙的大小:每种测试的种植体系统都有十个样本,在不同的扭矩下确定间隙的宽度。使用万能数字扳手将基台连接到夹具上。对所有样品都施加了 10 N/cm 的扭矩值。评估微间隙后,将夹具重新定位到工作台副中,并将扭矩增加到 20、30,最后增加到 40 N/cm。使用扫描电子显微镜进行微间隙评估。在扭矩增加到 40 牛顿/厘米之前,在 30 牛顿/厘米的扭矩下使用每个测试种植体系统的 11 个样本来确定金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌在测试种植体中的渗漏情况。数据采用多重单因素方差分析、Post Hoc 和卡方检验进行分析:结果:在所有扭矩下,Ankylos 系统的间隙最大(p < 0.005),而 JD 系统的间隙最小(p < 0.005)。在细菌渗漏方面,JD 系统对细菌的附着力最高,而且主要附着在绿脓杆菌上,而 Ankylos 系统对细菌的附着力最低(p < 0.005)。结论:结论:在一定范围内,较高的扭力可提供更高的IAI贴合度,从而提供更高的稳定性。Ankylos 种植体的间隙最大,而 JD 种植体的间隙最小。在细菌渗漏方面,JD 对绿脓杆菌的附着力最高,而 ORA 系统对大肠杆菌的附着力最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IN VITRO SURVIVAL AND FRACTURE FORCE OF LITHIUM DISILICATE HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions. A Cross-Sectional Study of Temporomandibular Disorders Among Postgraduate Students. Translucency Parameters and Masking Abilities of Monolithic CAD/CAM Ceramics. A Comparison of Occlusal Schemes with Condylar Inclination and Anterior Guidance in Dentate Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1