Gendered repartnering in later life: structural and processual dimensions of the transition into new relationships

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Ageing & Society Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1017/s0144686x24000072
Luisa Bischoff
{"title":"Gendered repartnering in later life: structural and processual dimensions of the transition into new relationships","authors":"Luisa Bischoff","doi":"10.1017/s0144686x24000072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Against the backdrop of demographic change and the pluralisation of living arrangements, the article focuses on repartnering after widowhood, divorce and separation in older age in Germany. While theoretically framing repartnering as a lifecourse transition, the question arises of how later-life relationships form in relation to gender- and ageing-specific as well as structural and processual dimensions. Since previous research indicates that there are gender-specific patterns when repartnering in older age which differ from repartnering in middle age, the article explicitly accounts for gendered ageing and attitudes towards ageing. Using data from the German Ageing Survey (1996–2017), longitudinal hybrid panel regressions are modelled for 3,653 respondents, 11,628 observations and 179 new relationships. I propose to understand within-effects as <span>processual</span> and between-effects as <span>structural</span> dimensions of repartnering. The results for the <span>structural</span> dimensions show that the likelihood of repartnering is higher for men and for individuals with more negative attitudes towards ageing. The results for the <span>processual</span> dimensions show how repartnering becomes less likely the older one gets and the more positive one's attitudes towards ageing become. The interaction term for gender and ageing shows that ageing has a stronger influence on the likelihood to repartner for women than for men. Additionally, the findings reveal a difference between forms of singlehood: in the short term, repartnering is less likely for divorced or separated individuals than for widowed individuals, whereas the opposite effect shows in the long term. In sensitising the lifecourse perspective with gender- and ageing-specific concepts and analytically separating <span>processual</span> and <span>structural</span> dimensions, this article demonstrates the importance of gendered ageing and of the linkage between relationship transitions. Applying hybrid panel models to lifecourse transitions in older age reveals the processual dynamic and structural embeddedness of repartnering in older age.</p>","PeriodicalId":51364,"journal":{"name":"Ageing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x24000072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of demographic change and the pluralisation of living arrangements, the article focuses on repartnering after widowhood, divorce and separation in older age in Germany. While theoretically framing repartnering as a lifecourse transition, the question arises of how later-life relationships form in relation to gender- and ageing-specific as well as structural and processual dimensions. Since previous research indicates that there are gender-specific patterns when repartnering in older age which differ from repartnering in middle age, the article explicitly accounts for gendered ageing and attitudes towards ageing. Using data from the German Ageing Survey (1996–2017), longitudinal hybrid panel regressions are modelled for 3,653 respondents, 11,628 observations and 179 new relationships. I propose to understand within-effects as processual and between-effects as structural dimensions of repartnering. The results for the structural dimensions show that the likelihood of repartnering is higher for men and for individuals with more negative attitudes towards ageing. The results for the processual dimensions show how repartnering becomes less likely the older one gets and the more positive one's attitudes towards ageing become. The interaction term for gender and ageing shows that ageing has a stronger influence on the likelihood to repartner for women than for men. Additionally, the findings reveal a difference between forms of singlehood: in the short term, repartnering is less likely for divorced or separated individuals than for widowed individuals, whereas the opposite effect shows in the long term. In sensitising the lifecourse perspective with gender- and ageing-specific concepts and analytically separating processual and structural dimensions, this article demonstrates the importance of gendered ageing and of the linkage between relationship transitions. Applying hybrid panel models to lifecourse transitions in older age reveals the processual dynamic and structural embeddedness of repartnering in older age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚年的性别再婚:向新关系过渡的结构和过程问题
在人口结构变化和生活安排多元化的背景下,文章重点关注德国老年丧偶、离婚和分居后的重新伴侣关系。虽然从理论上讲,重新结为伴侣是一种生命历程的过渡,但同时也提出了一个问题,即晚年关系是如何形成的,这与性别、年龄、结构和过程等方面都有关系。以往的研究表明,老年再婚与中年再婚有不同的性别模式,因此本文明确阐述了性别老龄化和对老龄化的态度。利用德国老龄化调查(1996-2017 年)的数据,对 3653 名受访者、11628 个观测值和 179 个新关系建立了纵向混合面板回归模型。我建议将内部效应理解为再婚的过程性因素,将之间效应理解为再婚的结构性因素。结构维度的结果显示,男性和对老龄化持消极态度的人重新结为伴侣的可能性更高。过程维度的结果表明,年龄越大,对老龄化的态度越积极,再婚的可能性就越小。性别与老龄化的交互项表明,老龄化对女性重新缔结伴侣的可能性的影响要大于男性。此外,研究结果还揭示了不同单身形式之间的差异:从短期来看,离婚或分居者重新结为伴侣的可能性要低于丧偶者,而从长期来看,则出现了相反的效果。这篇文章用性别和老龄化的特定概念对生命历程视角进行了宣传,并在分析中将过程和结构维度分开,从而证明了性别老龄化和关系转变之间联系的重要性。将混合面板模型应用于老年期的生命历程转换,揭示了老年期再婚的过程动态性和结构嵌入性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing & Society
Ageing & Society GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Ageing & Society is an interdisciplinary and international journal devoted to the understanding of human ageing and the circumstances of older people in their social and cultural contexts. It draws contributions and has readers from many disciplines including gerontology, sociology, demography, psychology, economics, medicine, social policy and the humanities. Ageing & Society promotes high-quality original research which is relevant to an international audience to encourage the exchange of ideas across the broad audience of multidisciplinary academics and practitioners working in the field of ageing.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness and social isolation of ethnic minority/immigrant older adults: a scoping review Labour market exit routes in high- and low-educated older workers before and after social insurance and retirement policy reforms in Sweden Social engagement and wellbeing in late life: a systematic review Understanding older adults' travel behaviour and mobility needs during the COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of the hierarchy of travel needs: a systematic review Tragedy and value of life of older persons in long-term care homes during COVID-19: a critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1