Bridging return to work after diagnosis of chronic disease with social dialogue: a conceptual and analytical framework

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Employee Relations Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1108/er-11-2022-0524
Adela Elena Popa, Marta Kahancová, Mehtap Akgüç
{"title":"Bridging return to work after diagnosis of chronic disease with social dialogue: a conceptual and analytical framework","authors":"Adela Elena Popa, Marta Kahancová, Mehtap Akgüç","doi":"10.1108/er-11-2022-0524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper makes a conceptual contribution by intersecting two strands of literature (return to work following health issues and industrial relations) to facilitate our understanding of the potential role of social dialogue in supporting return to work (RTW) following the diagnosis of a chronic illness. It conceptualises the levels and channels through which various actors and their interactions may play a role in RTW facilitation within the actor-centred institutional framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The paper uses an exploratory design based mainly on desk research but is also informed by roundtable discussions done in six countries as part of a larger project.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The conceptual and analytical framework (CAF) is developed to explain how various actors interact together in ways shaped by the RTW policy framework and the industrial relations systems, resulting in a continuum of RTW facilitation situations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>There is limited research on return-to-work policies following diagnosis of chronic illness from a comprehensive actor-oriented perspective. The existing literature usually focusses on just one stakeholder, overlooking the role of social dialogue actors. By bridging the two streams of literature and incorporating all potential actors and their interactions in a unitary model, the proposed framework provides a valuable tool to further discuss how successful RTW after a diagnosis of chronic illness can be facilitated.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":"273 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-11-2022-0524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper makes a conceptual contribution by intersecting two strands of literature (return to work following health issues and industrial relations) to facilitate our understanding of the potential role of social dialogue in supporting return to work (RTW) following the diagnosis of a chronic illness. It conceptualises the levels and channels through which various actors and their interactions may play a role in RTW facilitation within the actor-centred institutional framework.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper uses an exploratory design based mainly on desk research but is also informed by roundtable discussions done in six countries as part of a larger project.

Findings

The conceptual and analytical framework (CAF) is developed to explain how various actors interact together in ways shaped by the RTW policy framework and the industrial relations systems, resulting in a continuum of RTW facilitation situations.

Originality/value

There is limited research on return-to-work policies following diagnosis of chronic illness from a comprehensive actor-oriented perspective. The existing literature usually focusses on just one stakeholder, overlooking the role of social dialogue actors. By bridging the two streams of literature and incorporating all potential actors and their interactions in a unitary model, the proposed framework provides a valuable tool to further discuss how successful RTW after a diagnosis of chronic illness can be facilitated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断慢性病后重返工作岗位与社会对话的桥梁:概念和分析框架
目的 本文通过交叉两方面的文献(健康问题后重返工作和劳资关系),促进我们对社会对话在支持慢性疾病诊断后重返工作(RTW)中的潜在作用的理解,从而在概念上做出贡献。本文在以行为者为中心的制度框架内,对各种行为者及其互动可能在促进复工中发挥作用的层次和渠道进行了概念化。研究结果本文制定了概念和分析框架(CAF),以解释各种行为者如何在复工政策框架和劳资关系体系的影响下相互作用,从而形成连续的复工促进状况。原创性/价值从全面的行为者导向视角出发,对慢性病诊断后的复工政策进行的研究十分有限。现有文献通常只关注一个利益相关者,忽视了社会对话参与者的作用。通过弥合这两种文献流,并将所有潜在的参与者及其互动纳入一个统一的模型,所提出的框架为进一步讨论如何促进慢性病诊断后的成功复工提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
期刊最新文献
Exploring ambidextrous human resource management and employee performance through the lens of managers’ ambidextrous orientation and individual ambidexterity Talent management practices and the influence of their use on employee outcomes via perceived career growth Beyond liberalization: employers’ organizations’ varied responses to employment law Pay information and employees’ perception of organizational support: the mediating role of pay satisfaction E-work self-efficacy and innovative behaviour: a moderated mediation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1